717
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A new Yahoo/YouGov survey finds that about twice as many U.S. adults say they would vote for a candidate with Mamdani's platform (50%) than say they would not (26%). Could it be a blueprint for Democrats elsewhere?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 39 points 6 days ago

It's kind of dumb, because politicians don't really matter aside from their policy.

I guess that means that most of the attack ads probably had some impact and that US voters are against this guy, but can't remember why?

I swear sometimes it feels were in an disinformation dark ages. Like dehydrating on a boat in the ocean.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

Lack of credible news sources. It's all entertainment now. Those in power are afraid of a well-informed electorate. However, as Americans, it's our duty to cut through the bs

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

yeah but fooooooooooooootbaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall!!!!!! woooooooooooooooooooooooo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Policies mesn nothing without trust

[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

What is the problem they have with Zo... nevermind...

he's not a white moron. That explains a lot.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

The poll says 46% of Republicans and 42% of Democrats outside of New York don't have an opinion on a guy running to be Mayor of New York.

Clickbaitey article headline implies not having an opinion on a politician running for mayor in another city means the same as being unfavorable towards that politician. Yes he has a low favorable number but a massive "no opinion" number because should people give a shit about a politician in another city?

New Yorkers may like to to think they're the center of the world, but shockingly over 40% of people outside of New York probably don't know who this guy is because why should they?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Really. I've read quite a bit about him, and I've never even been in North America.

But I also try to stay informed, and our news are infested with US culture war bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Well you're in a politics community on lemmy, so you're going to hear about all of the leftist populists constantly. But I don't think lemmy is an extremely popular web forum.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

Don’t need to be a certain color or gender to get the job done correctly to help the people.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This survey seems to suggest otherwise.

Many, including myself, see Trumps wins as backlash by legacy European settler descendants for to a part African man serving two terms as president.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Abstract policies are a notoriously poor way of polling for voting patterns.

But it seems most people don't have a strong opinion on our New York boy, which is honestly the best we could ask for at this junction. May ~~Zohran the DESTROYER'S enemies be DESTROYED~~ Mamdani succeed and, for our sakes if not necessarily his, go on to national politics after. Gods know we need him.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

The weird part is it shouldn't be, it shows how enthralled every is by the sports team 'us and them' dynamic that they'd rather vote for policies they hate than for someone not on their team.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I think it speaks more to how shallow policy questions tend to be.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

The ghouls, sewer-dwelling demons, and subterranean goblins are all assembling their forces to defeat Mamdani.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

I mean haven't the likes of Chomsky and Cenk been pointing this out for decades? When polling Americans on the issues, they tend to be progressive?

That's in spite of a helluva lot of propaganda that is nonstop, 24/7, in favor of corporations, by the way...

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Yes this has been a known fact for like 30 years. But somehow it feels like no one internalised it so I keep sharing examples.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Please do continue. The usual trope that "most people are cons" is common currency, nearly everywhere, even though it's false.

[-] sommerset 7 points 6 days ago

Yeah, thing is Democrats are on the same side of the class war as Republicans.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Just say that he wants the Epstein files released.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Could it be a blueprint for Democrats elsewhere?

Democrats elsewhere: "For messaging right? A blueprint for our messaging? Right?"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
717 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24821 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS