Yes but
-brown people have rights
This is a deal breaker for ol Nance
that's exactly it, I don't care about your free speech if all you do is hate on others, then you deserve no fuckin rights. Death to the GOP Nazis
Also,
Queer folk are allowed to exist.
She's not tolerant of this.
I don't particularly like Gavin and he obviously isn't going to tout our housing prices or homeless problem, but yeah, he's right (and it's true for most blue states).
Brainwashing reds is spooky, and after seeing so many AI images of my hometown on fire, it's only going to get worse.
The worst part of this is that evangelical Christians in particular are just mentally primed to be manipulated by AI.
Mark my words. AI is going to make evangelicals/christian nationalist even weirder and scarier
A demented 'AI' chat bot is essentially the actual perfect vector to spread stochastic terrorism.
We already have multiple stories of people falling deeply in love with AI boyfriends and girlfriends, and then being emotionally distraught when they hit their max continuous msg limit and 'reset' akin to a lover suddenly developing amnesia.
We already have multiple stories of AI chatbots encouraging suicide, encouraging and exaggerating schizophrenic style delusions to the point that people go do something very ill advised.
... someone, or many someones, are going to use these things as a sort of human botnet, essentially as near literal of a 'mind virus' as you can yet actually achieve.
The models these things use are very much human unreadable, even by world leading experts.
IMO, its very likely someone will figure out a more clever or more clandestine way to get an AI chatbot to act like MechaHitler Grok, but only to people who are emotionally unstable / suggestible, and then they can obfuscate or delete all the logs via some kind of interpretation of privacy laws.
...
From 'brainrot' to 'cyberpsycho'.
We also already have multiple stories of people believing that God is literally speaking to them through chatGPT. I was raised young earth creationist and it is easy for me to slip back into that mindset and imagine that of course Adonai could choose to speak to me directly through chatGPT. He who has ears to hear, let him hear, and shit.
I was also raised fundamentalist... and yeah, yep.
I just class that as schizoid style delusions these days, because that basically is what that is.
And you can do it here. Or on any other anonymous social media. 4chan, Reddit, Facebook, whatever. It has been done and will continue to be done.
They're all levers controlling public opinion.
While I agree with both his points and yours, I have to wonder how productive it is to essentially be baited into saying "your state sucks! California number one!"
Doesn't really seem like the best way to deprogram a deeply brainwashed and prideful culture.
It isn't, and I've got friends in the Midwest who are more or less held hostage by people who vote R regardless of anything. We're not really sure how you deprogram people, but having the poster child for smug, San Fran elitist be our spokesperson ain't it.
That said, someone like Walz doesn't seem to change their views, either. It feels rather helpless, honestly.
At this point I don't even care. These idiots will destroy the world no matter what I do, so at least I can get some smug satisfaction dopamine in the process.
You can't deprogram people until they're removed from the programming that caused the issue in the first place. Sadly, that's the majority of media outlets and social media these days.
I am happy to see somebody be aggressive and direct towards republicans. And in public. This is what all democrats need to do.
Mace has no idea what half of that list even is.
I don't have an answer but the problem is that millions of Americans have become so stupid they got conned by some con men into handing over the keys to the farm, and even when they get kicked out of the farmhouse and have to live in the pigsty, they'll accuse the pigs of dragging them down.
I mean, Gavin Newsom is a feckless parasitic POS who has made "Becoming President" his singular goal behind which he will sell out any conceivable virtue or ounce of integrity. He's done far more to emiserate the state's homeless population and inhibit its ability to develop mass transit or cheap housing than oppose any Republican initiative. Meanwhile, he's shamelessly pandering to Silicon Valley, the Real Estate Lobby, and his best friends at Getty Mansion.
But I'm not going to listen to a guy who took time off planting a burning cross in front of a black church to tell me they don't like him either.
I looked it up because I was curious; If you adjust for cost of living (PCPI, adjusted by regional price parity. Thanks wikipedia); Then California ranks 13 and South Carolina is 47.
Apparently D.C. is #1, which I could have guessed, but Wyoming is #2, which I definitely wouldn't have.
i wish the colonies would STFU and dissolve already
Death to America
I cant tell which is replying to which tbh.
"Time for a bathroom break"? Where do you think she's tweeting from?
Huh, the state of South Carolina as a whole has about the same murder rate as the city of Oakland, CA. I wasn't expecting it to be that high.
Anyway, while this is a sick burn, I think that one could argue that the very real advantages that California has are not caused by the way that it's governed and in fact I have heard California residents claim that those advantages exist despite the way that California is governed, but I don't know how representative those California residents are. I can see how a person could reasonably prefer not to have her state governed the way that California is without being ignorant, but that sort of discussion won't be happening on Twitter.
(I personally love the way that New Hampshire is governed, and that's a state very unlike California. I hope to live there again someday, but I acknowledge that it's not for everyone.)
Can you briefly explain the difference between how California is governed vs New Hampshire?
I’m not a newsom fan for sure. But every time I’ve been to New Hampshire, I’m disappointed in a few things. Transportation is bad. Many businesses shut down and empty.
I liked the low taxes/few government services way of doing things in New Hampshire, as well as the emphasis that voters and politicians placed on the importance of being left alone. Taxes are way higher in California, and while I get that keeping big cities running is expensive, does it have to be that expensive? I suspect that it doesn't, especially since even with all that tax money the Bay Area (the part of California that I'm familiar with) is not very pleasant compared to some big cities in other states, including states with lower taxes. It's true that the Bay Area, rather than those other cities, is the biggest tech hub in the country, but I suspect that that's the case despite of rather than because of the taxes and what they do and don't pay for.
(I'm not 100% confident in my claims about the Bay Area. I've spent a lot of time there but I haven't ever lived there full-time.)
No, they don’t want that. They’re sadistic bullies.
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
