234
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 80 points 6 days ago

I think a more recent map is more interesting:

Remember, America was not built for the car, as ignorant people often claim. It was demolished for the car.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago

What's crazy to me is that many of the railroads still exist and are used... But for freight only.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

I looked at taking the train from Albuquerque to Denver, it goes east to Chicago before going back to Denver. It is a 7 hour drive, but a 32 hour train ride.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

To be fair, we're using really fucking old technology so it's not surprising that it's that much slower.

If we had proper high speed rail, like the Shinkansen, it would be much shorter.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

There is also the fact for a 450 mile trip you have to go 2300 miles.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

What people with epilepsy or other conditions do?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

suffer in silence
but also hopefully they have friends and family who will chaffeur them, and greyhound buses exist, airplanes too.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago

Look at what they took from us!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Look how they massacred my boy!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It has not gotten too much better since then, for passenger trains anyway.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

It got way better between the 1860s and 1940s. The issue is that starting in the '50s it declined again.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Not the stretch through Appalachia between Harrisburg and Pittsburgh. That stretch is eternal and unchanging.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Funny how the southern states literally only had Mobile, New Orleans, and Charleston. The war should've been a year long no diff ngl. Good generals make a difference, who could've guessed?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

'Good' is a strong word. A lot of '61 was two sets of incompetents flailing at each other, and the dice coming up lucky for the South, while '62 and '63 was largely a series of unforced errors on the part of incompetent Northern generals. The strategic acumen of Lee et co is much overstated.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

I wasn't saying that southern generals were good, just that most of the northern ones didn't seem to be. Sorry for being unclear.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Ah, yeah, completely correct then.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Tactical Acumen I think. That's the overall reputation of Lee, earned or not. He's never really been noted as a good strategist.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The northern elite also didn’t want to win at the start of the war: the union as it was, constitution as it is (with slavery that is). For the northern elite the south was a source of cheap cotton and an export market for finished goods, winning decisively would break that balance.

The end of slavery was truly a bottoms up movement, that forced the contradiction to be so great that it could not exist in one country.

John Dolan (aka the war nerd) has a great series on this subject on his podcast: Radio War Nerd.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

The north was also fighting in enemy territory. If you ignore that part, for example, then our recent wars in the Middle East don't make any sense.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

If labour is free, you don’t need industrialisation, and that attitude carries over to logistics.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Cincinnati has a huge train station turned into a museum, it was pretty cool from what i remember

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

There was a meme the other day about every American town having a train depot that was turned into a museum. I have never lived in a city that didn't have that exact thing.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

In my hometown, there was a train museum, and an old train you could take to a (very close) neighboring town... where there was also a train museum, lmao

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

And those lines that are in NYC? Yup the same ones we use today. They haven't been updated since I bet.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

oh sure they have! they tore down the overhead wire :))))))))))))))))))))))))))

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
234 points (97.6% liked)

Illustrations of history

1743 readers
42 users here now

This magazine is for sharing artwork of historical events, places, personages, etc. Scale models and the like also welcome!

Generally speaking, actual photos of a historical item should go to [email protected]

Photos of ruins should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS