It’s kind of wild that a dozen states keep suing asking, “can I be racist now?” to no avail.
And even trying it again after being told no.
"what about... Now?
They're not really being told "no", though; mainly the Supreme Court is simply not taking the cases and leaving lower rulings in place. They could take one of these cases and issue a ruling that firmly shuts everything else down but they haven't done that. One could surmise that they haven't done that because the Federalist Society "justices" are waiting for a case with facts they like more to issue the ruling they want in a narrow way that will hurt Democrats and minorities without impacting the GOP. They're looking for a way to tailor a ruling that prevents blue states from gerrymandering while allowing the GOP the legal right to pick their voters in red states.
And, as we've seen with the cases of the praying football coach and wedding website, they don't even care if the cases are real or not as long as they can use them to navigate to the ruling they wanted to issue all along.
The Supreme Court already took this case. And to everyone's surprise, Roberts and Kavanaugh sided with the liberals and shot down the practice of racial gerrymandering. So Alabama really is being told "no". Again.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday handed a defeat to Alabama Republicans for the second time in three months, rejecting their latest attempt to use a congressional map that includes only one majority-Black district.
The decision was in line with the Supreme Court ruling against the state in June that reaffirmed a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act.
This is interesting because my state eliminated its majority black districts and nothing happened beyond people complaining.
Next step should be tasking a special master to design the electoral maps & the US Marshall service enforcing Alabama's use of them.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.