1015
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, ripped Donald Trump for his military attack against Iran on Saturday, saying the move is "absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment."

Ocasio-Cortez ripped the president's action on X, formerly Twitter, and wrote, "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment."

On the other hand, Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, came to Trump's side and wrote on X, "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 70 points 20 hours ago

Mussolini got dragged through the streets and him and his gf’s lifeless corpses were hung upside down for all of Rome to see.

Weird fact. Not sure why I’m thinking of it

[-] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

Now THAT’s a PRIME NUMBER

Thank you for your attention to this matter

[-] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Primed & ready, you mean? That part of my math education's a little hazy. 🙇🏼‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

There is an old quote -

"The plight of the oppressed ends with the oppressor. Mussolini found this to be true, as will others."

[-] [email protected] 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Now, I wonder if that weird fact you are thinking of can have you picturing Donald Trump being dragged through the streets with JD Vance and him and his vice president's lifeless corpses being hung upside down for all the United States to see, in response to him giving the order to bomb Iran without congressional approval. And who here would like to see that actually happening.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

It was Milan. Though I'm sure the people of Rome were more than welcome to go see his bespatted husk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Franco died peacefully in his sleep at the age of 83, a fabulously rich celebrity who was officially mourned by the state for a month.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Spain changed a lot since then thankfully

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 14 hours ago

What are they gonna do about it? Lawsuit? Lmao

[-] [email protected] 43 points 20 hours ago

Only a rag would quote Fetterman and credit him as a Democrat. He doesn't act or believe what he did when he was elected as a Democrat, his perspective is irrelevant.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago

I've watched Fetterman's 180 from across the pond. Don't really understand what happened and what made him flip.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 19 hours ago

He had a stroke that damaged his brain.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

So, I like this idea, and the recent expose indicates that the stroke has essentially rendered him non compis mentis, but do you really think the brain damage turned him conservative? Were there no red flags before? I genuinely don't know enough about the guy.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

There were definitely red flags before, it’s just that people ignored them because he was better than Dr. Oz. There’s a good Some More News video that goes into it.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 21 hours ago

Keep screaming impeachment when clearly that doesn't work.....he belongs in jail ya know for being a 34 count felon rapist seditionous traitor.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

This one might actually stick since the Republican party is split over this.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

You know that that also did not work, right?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Yes clearly.

America is a shit show. Americans have shown they are ok with this.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago

Assuming the election wasn't hacked, yeah...

I have my doubts about the election (and I'm a big data engineer with a cyber security cert)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Those with the authority to do their jobs and jail trump willfully abdicated their responsibility to do so. Yeah, there absolutely is a subset of this population aggressively driving us toward an oligarchy and authoritarian kleptocracy, but the majority of American citizens would prefer to see the law upheld. We don’t want a three-tiered legal system, the bottom jails first and throws away the key, the middle bleeds you dry with legal costs, and the top has no rules or consequences.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Don't bunch us all up with the government. The government is ok with it being a shit show. Many voted against it. Many of us don't agree.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Sadly very true.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 22 hours ago

I want him actually removed from office. He was already impeached. Twice! It didn't do anything.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

To get him removed from office, you have to first get the House to vote (50%) to Impeach him. That is actually doable. But then the Senate has to hold a trial and somehow get 67 senators to vote to convict him. That would take every Dem and Independent and something like 20 Republicans to vote to convict. I agree with you, but I don't see that happening.

The only other way is by using the 25th Amendment which says, in part:

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Vance and all of Trump's appointed toadies would have to send a letter to the House and Senate saying Trump in not capable of being president. And even if, by some miracle that happened, the next step is for Congress to hold votes in both the House and the Senate needing two-thirds of both houses to declare that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Even if they somehow pulled that off in the House, it would still take 18 or 20 Republican senators to cross over and vote him out.

I just don't see any legislative way out of this. The Republicans in the House and Senate are simply not going to let it happen. They have too much power and no morals.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

Doesn’t matter they should still introduce the bill

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago

If literally anyone thinks "it's okay that Trump bombed Iran, it was the right move"...

Then couldnt you just argue that "if it was such an obviously right move, wouldn't it have been easy to get congress to approve it?"

It's illogical to on one hand say it was the right thing to do, while ignoring the fact he did it without approval.

If it was so right, then approval would've been easy to get...?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago

clearly grounds for impeachment

...add it to the pile, I guess.

But considering that impeachment is a legal process and that the current administration has zero respect for or inclination to follow the law, it's not like it'll accomplish shit. Dude needs to be deposed by those who have sworn to defend the constitution from domestic threats (the military) not run through some formal process.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago

Impeachment is specifically NOT a legal process but a political one. Trump's second impeachment acquittal was based on impeachment being a political process, and that the criminal justice system was the correct venue for J6.

That's also why the Justice department policy on not charging a sitting president and the SCOTUS ruling that Presidents are immune from prosecution are bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 194 points 1 day ago

Fuck Fetterman that piece of shit.

[-] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago

Gotta be a some kind of link between brain damage and rabid conservatism.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

Considering that studies have shown that conservatives have smaller regions of the brain than normal in the areas that are attributed to things like empathy and compassion - yes, yes there is.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 23 hours ago

Every day the Criminal in Chief commits impeachable crimes. Every. Day.

This is just the latest. But Congress is currently packed with illegitimate, undemocratically placed criminal cronies who face no accountability while shielding their criminal collaborators from accountability. So here we are.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I like how they pretend if he is not the president it wouldn’t be the same. They lied about WMD in Iraq and went to war in behalf of israel. And the did regime change in Libya, bomb and missions in Somalia and Yemen and not a single word from almost all congress about war crimes in gaza.

Let’s be honest, AIPAC controls all level of governments.

The only issue now, white MAGA, who actually hate Jew, or Russian propagandist are calling him out.

As soon as AIPAC find dirt on them or manage to buy them, the progressive movement will find themselves alone again.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago

One of like 1000 things he's done in the last few months that was either illegal, unconstitutional, "grounds for impeachment", or corrupt. 🥱

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1015 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24289 readers
2731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS