this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22023 readers
69 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

CBS dude rode on it and did an interview with the owner.

So many red flags.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29co_Hksk6o&feature=youtu.be

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Built with shit from Home Depot, controlled with a literal Logitech game controller, construction pipes as ballast... holy fuck, why would anybody agree to go 3.7km below the surface of the ocean in that deathtrap?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imagine paying $250k and the pilot pulls out the player 2 controller

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those Logitech controllers are actually pretty decent. I've had one for ages and it's still going strong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Hope the pilot tried ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️⬅️➡️🅱️🅰️ start

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Wow, that is super sketchy. Now I am not at all surprised this happened. Hope that company has a shit ton of insurance.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, I’ve seen so many Scientific deepwater vehicles that are thethered to the ship in some form. Why isn’t this thing hooked up to a cran yhat can get it back up if someone fails? I’d think passenger vessels should pass more rigurous safety standards than that.

Are they liable btw or is the “international waters” situation doing them any favor?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I seem to recall a point in that CBS video where they had to sign a waiver stating among other things that they acknowledged it was an experimental vessel that is not certified by or approved any regulatory agency, so, yeah. I don't know that I'd count on there being rigorous safely standards in that case

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I find it strangely hard to care about the fate of a handful of multimillionaire tourists when hundreds of refugees died last week due to the indifference of the Greek authorities - and the media barely noticed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s sort of… poetic in a messed up way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Only if the sub remains undiscovered for ~70 years.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Why did they name it Titan??

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

...officials are working to get a remotely operated vehicle that can reach a depth of 6,000 meters (about 20,000 feet) to the site as soon as possible.

The 5-person submersible, named Titan, is capable of diving 4,000 meters or 13,120 ft. “with a comfortable safety margin,” OceanGate said in its filing with the court.

but...after looking up on Wikipedia

...a wreck that lies over 12,000 feet (3,700 m) below the surface...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they’re advertising the depth limit of the recovery vehicle, not claiming that the wreck is actually at 20,000 feet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

They probably need quite a bit of margin too if the craft accidentally got lost in a deeper area

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might be best practice to use a vessel rated for considerably deeper than you actually go, in case of some problem in the hull?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And/or it's just a description of a particular vehicle they're bringing that was most convenient to get there quickly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's not like they're going to say, "oh, don't bring THAT recovery vehicle, it can go TOO deep."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe they're concerned that it no-clipped through the sea bottom and wound up deeper than the Titanic's current location?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Very wealthy people wasting a huge amount of society's resources to have mild fun doing something very risky then having to get rescued on the back of society at a high cost. I say let the die.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

this is a very weird first comment to make and the subsequent comments neither look productive nor particularly on topic. let's save the thirsting for rich people blood for a topic where it's more warranted folks, please and thanks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

But rich blood being spilled is the topic. They took a huge risk only to get more resources deployed to find them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry but saying you'd enjoy watching someone die under any circumstances is disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Regardless of one's opinion the super rich, the thing also has crew that are just there because they're paid to operate the thing, I doubt they make enough to buy tickets for this kind of thing themselves.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

What I dont get is that one of the passengers was a billionaire. He could have built himself the fanciest and safest vessel for a few Million Dollars with a whole naval operation attached. Of course thats a lot more than 250K but still nothing for a billionaire. These people are so out of touch and cheap its insane.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It goes to prove that billionaires are just as gullible as the rest of the people, all they had was just money and assets, it doesn't grant them wisdom or intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That much money must give you incredible hubris: up until this point you’ve never had a problem that money couldn’t fix (or ease) for you.

Unfortunately, you can’t bribe physics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if I had a stupid amount of money, there's no way in hell I would pay someone to stuff me inside what seems to be an over-sized propane tank, then send me to depths where the water pressure is so extreme it will literally crush you.

Just...no.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I particularly like the part where this specific submersible can't ever be opened from the inside, because it gets bolted shut from outside.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

This shits going to keep happening as companies continue to rush commercialization of "Extreme" Travel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

According to the article there is a metal eating bacteria that’s eating the titanic? And it the wreckage might be gone in a few decades?

That’s incredible

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now they probably have a new submersible to munch on...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who even has the vessels that can go deep enough to rescue them? This is the stuff of nightmares

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gabe Newell, yes the owner of Valve/Steam, has an ocean research organization that owns a submarine designed to dive down to 10km, to some of the deepest parts of the ocean.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

To be fair, even if no vehicle that could rescue it from the bottom is available, that doesn't mean that there is no use in a rescue mission if they don't know where the sub is. For instance, it could have surfaced but had it's communications lost, in which case they'd still need rescue, because based on a CBS video of the sub in question shared elsewhere on the thread, the thing doesn't actually have a hatch and just has the front taken off and then bolted back on afterwards to let people in and out, and obviously is going to be airtight given it's a sub and all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It has 96 hours of life support, I have faith.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am hopeful, but not necessarily optimistic...if it lost power and descended below crush depth, no amount of life support is bringing them back.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›