top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)

CBS dude rode on it and did an interview with the owner.

So many red flags.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29co_Hksk6o&feature=youtu.be

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (10 children)

    Built with shit from Home Depot, controlled with a literal Logitech game controller, construction pipes as ballast... holy fuck, why would anybody agree to go 3.7km below the surface of the ocean in that deathtrap?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Wow, that is super sketchy. Now I am not at all surprised this happened. Hope that company has a shit ton of insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Also, I’ve seen so many Scientific deepwater vehicles that are thethered to the ship in some form. Why isn’t this thing hooked up to a cran yhat can get it back up if someone fails? I’d think passenger vessels should pass more rigurous safety standards than that.

    Are they liable btw or is the “international waters” situation doing them any favor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I seem to recall a point in that CBS video where they had to sign a waiver stating among other things that they acknowledged it was an experimental vessel that is not certified by or approved any regulatory agency, so, yeah. I don't know that I'd count on there being rigorous safely standards in that case

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I find it strangely hard to care about the fate of a handful of multimillionaire tourists when hundreds of refugees died last week due to the indifference of the Greek authorities - and the media barely noticed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    That’s sort of… poetic in a messed up way.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    ...officials are working to get a remotely operated vehicle that can reach a depth of 6,000 meters (about 20,000 feet) to the site as soon as possible.

    The 5-person submersible, named Titan, is capable of diving 4,000 meters or 13,120 ft. “with a comfortable safety margin,” OceanGate said in its filing with the court.

    but...after looking up on Wikipedia

    ...a wreck that lies over 12,000 feet (3,700 m) below the surface...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It might be best practice to use a vessel rated for considerably deeper than you actually go, in case of some problem in the hull?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Very wealthy people wasting a huge amount of society's resources to have mild fun doing something very risky then having to get rescued on the back of society at a high cost. I say let the die.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [M] 20 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    this is a very weird first comment to make and the subsequent comments neither look productive nor particularly on topic. let's save the thirsting for rich people blood for a topic where it's more warranted folks, please and thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    What I dont get is that one of the passengers was a billionaire. He could have built himself the fanciest and safest vessel for a few Million Dollars with a whole naval operation attached. Of course thats a lot more than 250K but still nothing for a billionaire. These people are so out of touch and cheap its insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It goes to prove that billionaires are just as gullible as the rest of the people, all they had was just money and assets, it doesn't grant them wisdom or intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Even if I had a stupid amount of money, there's no way in hell I would pay someone to stuff me inside what seems to be an over-sized propane tank, then send me to depths where the water pressure is so extreme it will literally crush you.

    Just...no.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    This shits going to keep happening as companies continue to rush commercialization of "Extreme" Travel.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    According to the article there is a metal eating bacteria that’s eating the titanic? And it the wreckage might be gone in a few decades?

    That’s incredible

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Who even has the vessels that can go deep enough to rescue them? This is the stuff of nightmares

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    To be fair, even if no vehicle that could rescue it from the bottom is available, that doesn't mean that there is no use in a rescue mission if they don't know where the sub is. For instance, it could have surfaced but had it's communications lost, in which case they'd still need rescue, because based on a CBS video of the sub in question shared elsewhere on the thread, the thing doesn't actually have a hatch and just has the front taken off and then bolted back on afterwards to let people in and out, and obviously is going to be airtight given it's a sub and all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    It has 96 hours of life support, I have faith.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›