you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Wow, that is super sketchy. Now I am not at all surprised this happened. Hope that company has a shit ton of insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Also, I’ve seen so many Scientific deepwater vehicles that are thethered to the ship in some form. Why isn’t this thing hooked up to a cran yhat can get it back up if someone fails? I’d think passenger vessels should pass more rigurous safety standards than that.

    Are they liable btw or is the “international waters” situation doing them any favor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I seem to recall a point in that CBS video where they had to sign a waiver stating among other things that they acknowledged it was an experimental vessel that is not certified by or approved any regulatory agency, so, yeah. I don't know that I'd count on there being rigorous safely standards in that case

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    There was a conspiracy that the original titanic going down was an insurance scam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    There's also a conspiracy that my farts smell like rancid carrots because the government puts carrots up my butt while I'm sleeping

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    An easily disproved one too, as the sister ships weren’t actually identical. Also the recent scan on the ship revealed the hull number 401 on one of the propellers putting another nail in the coffin of the idea the ship is actually the Olympic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments