all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 1 year ago (10 children)

How did they pick up the gun?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Also what's shooting them going to achieve? Are they gonna die again?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Yes, he'll become a ghost ghost and the living guy will have to stab a knife with another knife, then use the ghost knife to stab the ghost gun and use the ghost ghost gun on the ghost ghost, and so an ad infinitum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you think about it, this means the main character is actually dead.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you can grab ghost gun why can't you grab ghost ghost?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was just about to ask that. he could probably just die and turn into a ghost to be able to hold the ghost gun, but that would defeat the point of not getting killed by the ghost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    This feels like one of those ‘everyone had this conversation while really high once’ sort of thing.

  • source
  • You could almost call it a ghost gun :3

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Theres an SCP for this

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    While filling late night silence with noise, I recently saw a YouTube video of the format where a voice (possibly AI?) stretched a Reddit comment from a D&D (variant of some kind) DM into a 20 minute long narrative.
    The story was that the DM gave a “that guy” murderhobo an outlet for their shoot ‘em up artificer murderhobo ways by bringing an NPC ghost into the party for dinner, whereupon the ghost could not ‘eat’ with them until the murderhobo, at the ghost’s prompting, shot the ghost’s plate of food, causing it to splatter and shatter, spraying the party-mates with food, revealing the ghost plate in its stead, which the ghost happily chowed down on - joining the party for dinner, and giving the player some way to feel like a very special boy.

    Anyway. Wonder if the artist saw that comment or perhaps the video.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Now that I'm most of the way through Buffy the Vampire Slayer, this actually feels plausible.

  • source
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why much trick when fewer trick do trick?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Then he turns into a ghost-god, and only special techniques can defeat him.

  • source
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Wow, exquisite art. Why, just look at the intricate backgrounds. Who wouldn't clamor to see more of this cartoonists' work?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Note to self: the secret to a good webcomic (or any comic) is...intricate backgrounds???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I get that I am being melodramatic & going way too hard on this cartoonists &, in all fairness, the comic itself is pretty funny.

    But goddamn if I am not sick & tired of lazy ass cartoonists that just draw white blobby dudes one step up from stick men. Fucking LAME.

    I put "hilarious comics" into DDG & just LOOK at the mess of blobby white people drawn over shitty (or no) backgrounds combined with way too many words. Prince Valiant these ain't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Holy fuck you got cranky before you got online today. Someone shat in your cornflakes hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes, you are correct! I'm going waaaaay to hard on this. But sometimes I just got to lash out!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    No. You don’t have to lash out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)