99
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Apparently the floodgates are open and its open season on my-hero

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

As much as I hate to admit this, NASA has killed more astronauts than SpaceX

Who would have thought capitalism is a bad idea?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

If SpaceX had to do the foundational work that NASA did there would be many more dead and still no space travel. Ellie wouldn’t even consider things like oxygen, he’d just be asking why the thrusters need to be held on with three bolts instead of two.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

lol, could you imagine. Remind me, how many primates did he "Mengele" with his nuralink-thingy?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Honestly, 19 deaths is a shockingly good statistic for "what if we shot you into the void on an exploding soup can?"

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

When NASA (NACA in those days) blew up this many rockets the government fixed it by putting a bunch of Nazis in charge.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Space X took that lesson to heart, I guess?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The Nazis need to be smart.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Gen Z is about to find out why NASA stands for: Need Another Seven Astronauts

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

(Insert usual caveat about how my respect for SpaceX's accomplishments is strictly for the actual scientists and engineers and technicians actually doing the work, and not for the know-nothing dipshit who owns most of the shares.)

In fairness they are trying to develop an entirely new type of spacecraft that's never been tried before by anyone, an upper stage that's actually reusable without refurbishment. My hope is that the Chinese space agency sees what works and what doesn't with Starship, and applies those lessons to their R&D program.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I don't think that's true. Early NASA launches had a failure rate of ~50% ^[https://appel.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/NASA_APPEL_ASK_32i_success_failure_nasa_culture.pdf] and the space program was not cancelled, whereas Starship has a failure rate of 44% of stated launch goals (granted many boosters and ships were lost when they went the primary mission focus).

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For the HLS that Starship is allegedly supporting, it's a pretty big miss since the timeline from the bidding process. I remember as of 2020 they were supposed to be doing an uncrewed lunar landing in Q1 2024. So far they've missed all the milestones and haven't actually completed one yet (HLS test launch Q2 2022, Q4 2022 Propellant transfer test, Q2 2023 Long duration flight test, Q3 2023 Critical design review, Q2 2024 Design certification review, Q1 2025 HLS Launch)

They haven't even tested it with cargo, right? I'd love to see them try with the 100T of cargo they're hoping for (because then they only need like 15 Starships launches to fuel one in orbit to go to the moon....) Can't recover the 2nd stage, just plummets back and explodes when it doesn't explode on the way up.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

look, its very difficult to put things into space. especially with all the benefit of information and research made publicly available through a government funded project that accomplished what you've failed repeatedly to do more than half a century ago with a mere fraction of the resources and technology.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

He needs to hurry up and send himself and everyone around him to Mars bazingapartiotismcurry-space

this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)

news

24068 readers
708 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS