595
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

Just took the train from Frankfurt to Strasbourg.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago

I used to take the train from Wales to Scotland. I'd get on at my local station and change once about half way through the trip. On arrival I could walk to my flat. The whole process took about eight hours.

Once I flew. First I had to get a bus to the airport, arrive early for security theatre, eventually fly, land, take a shuttle bus to a train station, then take a train to Cardiff Central, then take another train to my actual destination. The process took about six hours and was utterly exhausting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago

I’d love to hop on a train for a trip like that. So much more relaxing.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Let's just pretend the environmental impact is a negligible factor to save like 35 minutes on a 5-6 hour trip. Toronto - NYC, one way or another (have this guy ever been to an airport?).

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Biggest city in the US to biggest city in Canada, at a distance where high speed rail could be the best choice of it existed …

  • I see “3” daily departures from NYC for Toronto by train, sort of. Travel time is 12h, 29h, 34h,
  • For flying, I see 24 direct flights on the first page of my search, all under 2h, all cheaper than train
  • Or an 8h drive

Even as someone who really wants to take the train, that’s not under consideration

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I have my beef with the DB, but their ICE trains paired with SNCF are nothing to complain about

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

The world will progress out of sheer spite for Americans and I wouldn't have it any other way

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

I mean, it depends a bit. Toulouse to Rostock would be an annoying train ride. But Düsseldorf or Frankfurt to Paris would be kind of stupid to fly.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

Many short distance flights are business related but as someone who was working in an international corporation I can tell you there's plenty of business monkeys who fly simply for the prestige of it. They fly to attend meetings that could've been an email or a call just so they can pretend they're hot shit.

Massively disappointing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Having done both the flying and the high speed in a few routes in Europe, the overhead of flying is so much that for anything within about 1000km distance a high speed train is faster, especially because both the origin and the destination train stations are pretty much in the city center and have direct connections to the subway network so you almost always save time and hassle in just getting to the station from your actual origin and from the destination station to your actual destination on the other side, compared to an airport. This is especially so for budget airlines as they tend to use even more peripheric airports.

Further, within the Schengen space in the EU there is no kind of passport or security control, so in most of Europe you literally just walk into a train that happens to go to another country in just the same way as you walk into a train that happens to go to the next city over.

Even for larger distances when the whole trip door-to-door takes an extra hour or two due to doing it by train rather than flying, it's often worth it because the train is way more comfortable, with plenty of room and you can just get up whenever and go for a walk to the restaurant carriage and get yourself a drink or a light meal.

But yeah, beyond a certain point the train is not worth it anymore. For example Lisbon - Paris by high speed train would be around 6h on a straight line (if you could, which you can't because of the Golf Of Biscay) at 250 km/h whilst the flight is 3h, but of course, trains in Portugal being shit outside short commuter lines around the 2 major cities and the North-South axis, there isn't actually a high speed train to Paris or even to anywhere in Spain or even inside the country (fast trains at best, not high speed ones), so you have to take the train and a bus to the nearest point in Spain with a high speed train connection to Madrid and from there to Paris, so you're lucky if you do the whole trip in 17h.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
595 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

11770 readers
1654 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS