you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Let's just pretend the environmental impact is a negligible factor to save like 35 minutes on a 5-6 hour trip. Toronto - NYC, one way or another (have this guy ever been to an airport?).

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Biggest city in the US to biggest city in Canada, at a distance where high speed rail could be the best choice of it existed …

    • I see “3” daily departures from NYC for Toronto by train, sort of. Travel time is 12h, 29h, 34h,
    • For flying, I see 24 direct flights on the first page of my search, all under 2h, all cheaper than train
    • Or an 8h drive

    Even as someone who really wants to take the train, that’s not under consideration

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I'm someone who prefers to drive because I don't like people much and flying is now a miserable experience, but yes, when you tally up all the time it takes to go to the airport, park, go through security, and then fly (especially if there's a layover tacked on), you really don't save much time in the end.

    If I were a European and train service was more feasible, I'd go that route. It's really only a convenient option on the East Coast here.

    To me, flying is just not worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not to mention that frequent flying is also too much radiation exposure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments