Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Stephen Miller is an evil villain pulled directly out of some children's cartoon show.
I don't think they have the right to take that away.
They don't have the right (because it's illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they've done and yet here we are.
They do not.
but they think they do and that is dangerous
I'm not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don't care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
They don't have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
"privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."
That's the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.
It's not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
I dunno.
The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.
I think it's 7-2 against trump.
They have any and every "right" that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say "You're a Marxist, I don't have to listen to you. Fuck you."
:(
Is it "losing* if there's no consequences? Lol Bro is winning in 4k
Right... so anarchy it is then.
Sounds like it.
For the new people: Anarchy just means no hierarchy. Not being a dick. Remember that.
Anarchy should always be the goal.
I think you mean disobedience or resistance?
Hah, well, I was kind of paraphrasing a quote in my head I guess. But yes. You are correct.
Anarchy for the average person is not about political anarchy but just a word to mean chaos
Which is why we must correct it.
Oh heard. Just thought it might be a linguistic issue
If that happens I imagine we get a few more people whose red lines have been crossed.
They go this route then the protests every weekend here will become a different kind of rodeo.
If I'm there to peacefully protest and all of a sudden they can grab you a basically kill you (because let's face it it you get sent to El Salvador or Libia was it? You are dead. You are not getting out), people start packing and right fully so. Miller is a fucking moron and a scum bag.
Good! The Founders CLEARLY only Wrote the Constitution to Protect SCHOOL SHOOTERS and LITERALLY nothing Else! So EVERY OTHER PART of the Constitution like writ of habeas corpus can ACTUALLY be IGNORED!
BUT you DARE NOT IGNORE the Part that allows ME, a PRO LIFE REPUBLICAN, to SHOOT UP AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL!
Because of course they are