this post was submitted on 09 May 2025

128 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

489 readers

505 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

128

[CW: Transphobia] YOUR BODY BETRAYS YOUR PAPALCY (hexbear.net)

submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"LOOK UPON THE FACE OF YOUR NEW POPE. HIS HAPLOTYPE IS IRRELEVANT. HIS PERUVIAN HERITAGE ASIDE, LOOK INTO THE EYES OF A CHICAGO SPORTS FAN AND KNOW THAT HE HAS SUFFERED LIFETIMES OF ANGUISH. THE FAILURES OF THE HAM SANDWICH RACE PALE IN COMPARISON TO THE 'DOUBLE DOINK', THE BULLS AFTER THE YEAR 2000, AND THE UNSPEAKABLE TRAUMA OF BEING A CUBS FAN. KNOW THAT I DO NOT SPARE HIM THE JUSTIFIED TRUTH ABOUT HIS GENETICS OUT OF CONCERN, BUT MERELY RESTRAINT; THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL MISERY I NEED TO PLACE UPON A CHICAGO FAN, IT WOULD MAKE ME SEEM WEAK AND OPPORTUNISTIC... LIKE YOU, HAM SANDWICH."

top 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They literally saw this meme and thought it was legit:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

whats the issue? im a biology professor with a phd and this all checks out

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 hours ago

I studied at the disney pixar school of phrenology

[–] [email protected] 25 points 13 hours ago

if they accidentally made me the trans pope i would excommunicate every single us amerikkkan catholic and dispatch the swiss guard to kill them for heresy tbh

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago

measurehead

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago

Skull Check only

Somebody inform Shaun.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 15 hours ago

Thank you measurehead

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago

Skull Check only

No more half measures

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

What's that ghost rider ass skull for a male

[–] [email protected] 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I wish I could eyeball measurements this bad. Science would be so easy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago

I wish I could

Believe in yourself 🤗

[–] [email protected] 25 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Wait until they find out he has Creole heritage.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Quick, we gotta figure out his blood quantum!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

people on tic tok are already going through his family census records lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Believe it or not, this is why cracker support quantum physics now

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Do archeologists ever use skulls for gender identification in digs? I suspect it's incredibly unreliable to use as a means of identification due to overlapping variations.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You can, but it's not an exact science. Any responsible anthropologist calls it a sex estimate because it's not a sure thing. Broadly speaking biologically male skeletons tend to be more robust than biologically female skeletons but there are plenty of exceptions to this "rule".

Edit: ideally you'd also be using other methods for sex estimation and comparing all your results. It's still just an estimate if course because there's plenty of room for interpretation of skeletal remains. Plus obviously biological sex ≠ gender but that should go without saying

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Afaik they use pelvis, though other bones are also used when pelvis is unavailable, this is way less reliable though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Size itself seems particularly unreliable. Men can be small and women can be large just based on nutrition alone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Fun fact, when they exhumed general Pulaski remains, they determied he was a trans man.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago

With the pelvis it's not only size but the shape as well, especially for individuals who have given birth. The pelvis is a more reliable source for sex estimation than the skull, though it is still an educated guess. I would be very suspicious of anyone claiming to be able to determine the sex of any skeletal remains with any degree of certainty

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

talkin' out my dude ass doo doo ass here but I feel like they probably use literally whatever clues they have available including skull size and shape but probably within the context of as many other things as possible

like I think they kinda just do what they can when they have like half of a skull and a middle finger and they gotta figure that shit out

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago

When the pope is clocky :/

[–] [email protected] 20 points 15 hours ago

Can't even have a good, faithful Catholic church anymore

because of woke 😤😤😤😤

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

Conclave reference???

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago

I thought up two derangement syndromes today: there's Rachel Zegler Derangement Syndrome and there's also Everyone I Don't Like Is Secretly Trans Derangement Syndrome. Psychologists of hexbear note, these two often take up space in the average reactionary's head.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Telling the pope he will never be a real man to own the libs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

LOL, MAGA via the Kremlin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Amazing

[–] [email protected] 23 points 12 hours ago

Yeah sure, chuds in amerikkka never hated LGBT people before this