Paper in Nature Climate Change journal reveals major role wealthy emitters play in driving climate extremes

The world’s wealthiest 10% are responsible for two-thirds of global heating since 1990, driving droughts and heatwaves in the poorest parts of the world, according to a study.

While researchers have previously shown that higher income groups emit disproportionately large amounts of greenhouse gases, the latest survey is the first to try to pin down how that inequality translates into responsibility for climate breakdown. It offers a powerful argument for climate finance and wealth taxes by attempting to give an evidential basis for how many people in the developed world – including more than 50% of full-time employees in the UK – bear a heightened responsibility for the climate disasters affecting people who can least afford it.

“Our study shows that extreme climate impacts are not just the result of abstract global emissions; instead we can directly link them to our lifestyle and investment choices, which in turn are linked to wealth,” said Sarah Schöngart, a climate modelling analyst and the study’s lead author.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

The threshold to be in the top 10% is €42,980 or $49,000 (grossing from what I can tell).

The top 1% and 0.1% for comparison are 20x and 76x.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Yeah, what people forget is that even average americans (and central/northern europeans and some other plaves) are quite wealthy from a global perspective. Many people on lemmy, self included, are in that global 10%.

    And many of those emissions aren't something you can just avoid either, they often come as a result of being a user of local infrastructure etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And half the time they get mad when you point it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    In fairness, what are they going to do about being born into a richer slice of the world pie? As shitty as it is, people won't have much sympathy for those doing worse than them unless they've achieved a certain baseline. If they can't conceive of how life could be worse (many issues in this fragment), they won't accept or care that others are suffering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    At the very least, us 10%ers could be advocating for things that lower the carbon cost of our lifestyle, such as zoning reform.

    Note that I'm not talking about reducing the quality of our lifestyle. I'm talking about maintaining or improving the quality while making it more efficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • It's true. And we should all be doing that. If you're in the US, I promise you there are people in your community/local government who are desperate for any sort of support. Build bike lanes, build community gardens, help your neighbors. A lot of them need it.

    My previous statement was purely in reply to people getting mad when you point out that they're in a certain percentile. Realistically, what do you expect people to do with that information? What you're basically telling them is that in Sudan, they'd be the kings of the castle. But that's kind of useless information to someone living in middle of nowhere Kentucky, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    If my taxes would go towards make that infrastructure sustainable, i would happily pay more taxes. As it stands my taxes mostly go to more Autobahn, upkeep of parking spots, subsidies for desastrous industries and cross-financing the retirement insurance, so the boomers can go on cruise vacations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Is there a source for this?

    This was my assumption, but when I searched earlier, I could only find sources citing the top 12% was above $100k

    Wiki - Distribution of Wealth

    I'm assuming I've misunderstood something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    If you're reading this, you're in that 10%.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I want to know what part of the two-thirds, the 1% holds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Undeniably a majority. We can't ignore the fact that we have impact on climate too. Big interest want us to argue over blame rather than try to fix the problem (Them). That said, I don't commute by aircraft daily like Taylor Swift and every other rich person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Hmm, I am probably not, 10% is what, 700 million?

    Between all the rich people, USA, Canadians, UK, Germany, and the rest pf Western Europe that number likely includes enough people to exclude me as a central European

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    The last number I was given was that anyone who makes more than a converted $20,000 per year is in the global top 10%. There used to be a global income comparison tool that showed where you stand on the global scale. I feel 90% confident that any individual person reading this is someone who is above that line, especially if they can afford things like internet and electric together. Those kinds of guys are driving cars to work and eating out, instead of making their food every single day and listening to radio because they can't afford any luxuries.

    I agree that it ain't exactly smart to say everyone in a developed economy is doing well, but I want to remind anyone reading this to count their blessings and consider their own impact just as much as they try to hold the worst offenders accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Copied from reddit comment

    According to https://wid.world/world/#tptinc_p90p100_z/US;FR;DE;CN;ZA;GB;WO/last/us/k/x/yearly/t/false/0/200000/curve/false/country , the global 90th percentile income threshold in 2023 is at about $46,7k USD, market xchg rate.

    So yeah, it's quite a bit higher than that, plus I think you vastly underestimate how expensive it is to have your own internet connection and electricity.

    And I also make my food everyday that's quite normal for almost everyone but US citizens

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Context and after some searching

    • Global Top 10% Wealth: ~$93,170 (2018)).

    • Global Top 10% Income: ~$39,382 annually (PPP-adjusted).

    Wealth source

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/07/how-much-money-you-need-to-be-in-the-richest-10-percent-worldwide.html

    Income source

    https://wid.world/income-comparator/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nice to see the phrase "global heating" instead of the wimpy "global warming" or the even more milquetoasty "climate change". I prefer the phrase "anthropogenic runaway global heating" because it makes clear the scale and severity of the problem as well as its origin, and also for the handy acronym.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    Can we do top 1% so that I don't feel included?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    And in other news water is still wet

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    But have YOU been to space?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    Context and after some searching

    • Global Top 10% Wealth: ~$93,170 (2018)).

    • Global Top 10% Income: ~$39,382 annually (PPP-adjusted).

    Wealth source

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/07/how-much-money-you-need-to-be-in-the-richest-10-percent-worldwide.html

    Income source

    https://wid.world/income-comparator/

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Wealth is the great filter

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    To produce their analysis, the researchers fed wealth-based greenhouse gas emissions inequality assessments into climate modelling frameworks, allowing them to systematically attribute the changes in global temperatures and the frequency of extreme weather events that have taken place between 1990 and 2019.

    I do take studies like this with a grain of salt. I don't know this organization, but they certainly have a point of view, and it certainly is reasonable to think they could have run those computer simulations to say what they wanted it to say.

    Now with that said, I'd wager many of the folks in this thread are included in that 10%. The top 10% of the world makes like $50,000 a year. "Rich" is subjective and varies from country to country, region to region. Hell it can vary widely just in the US. And even in a single state (look at average wages for somebody in the NYC area versus Syracuse).

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    What do we do, set our inflation target to -2% instead?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Two-thirds of global heating caused by us here, study suggests (shocker)

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›