141
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 89 points 1 month ago

I had a conversation with Grok

Into the locker with you nerd!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 85 points 1 month ago

I'm glad someone said it. I tried watching the new Jurassic Park films and not a single dinosaur had a penis. The best part of the original film was comparing the penis stats and woke ruined that.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

The lack of penises is a pretty big plot point in the first movie

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

It's why they built the island if I'm not mistaken. To make the largest.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

'You, you stood on the penises of geniuses so you could accomplish something as fast as you could'

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Frogs can sometimes crazy-frog-trans. They were rmade with modified female frog DNA. And life......found a way.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Every now and then I am reminded that the crazy frog has his horrible little worm out. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago

I had a long discussion with Grok.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

How can you trust grok to tell you if something is woke, when grok itself is woke? liz-society

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Those who fight woke are doomed to become woke.

If you gaze into the woke, the woke gazes back at you.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

maybe they think it sounds better than "I was talking to myself"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago

Leftism was invented in 1990 by Michael Crichton. This is what he looks like today markkks-juggalo

[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago

Embryonic leftism and its a novel by a climate change denier 😭

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

As fun as Jurassic Park and in fact most of Crichton's books are, it's still basically "the manly maverick cowboy chad paleontologist owns the cringe woke soy corporate IT guys with facts and logic and a flamethrower."

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Though at least Hammond was treated with the contempt he deserved.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I'm hamming it up a bit, but there are some good things to it. Like that, and the cynicism towards corporate bullshit in general. Crichton had brainworms, but they were more that specific libertarian sort that's distrustful towards any sort of institution or power figure including corporations and rich people.

It feels like all his books really followed that one formula of some kind of manly maverick nerd consulting on some kind of corporate/government project run by soy conformist nerds who make dumb mistakes like not counting dinosaurs good or letting the nanobots do data storage and the manly maverick nerd instantly sees through them and saves the day, though.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

There is only one Hammond in Sci Fi that gets my respect. Hammond...of Texas.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The part of Stargate which requires the greatest suspension of disbelief is that they're in the USAF.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

Reactionaries are all-or-nothing sorts. If you aren't literally sieg heiling then you're part of the woke DEI liberal communist conspiracy.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Unless the reactionaries like you, then you are playing 4D chess against the :LIB: checkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago

michael crichton welcome to the resistance

[-] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago

yeah i read theory

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago

Michael Crichton was a libertarian tho

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago

Who denies climate change too. Thinks because he writes vaguely science-related stuff he's qualified to dispute the conclusive findings of thousands of scientists in their field and dozens of world-wide scientific bodies.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

it's funny, he apparently went to medical school, so it seems like he's cursed with having JUUUUST enough knowledge but not enough to know he doesnt know anything.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

Dunning-Kreuger hits medical doctors and engineers the hardest.

I used to work for a civil engineer who was convinced that climate change was fake. While he was having to take rising sea levels into account. While he knew firsthand that the instances of 100-year storms had increased beyond what was statistically considered normal. He was still convinced that God would not allow humanity to alter the climate.

Specialized knowledge in a narrow field, can turn people into the biggest idiot. The humility it takes to be an expert in something but still listen to others, is beyond a lot of people. This is made even worse by fields like medicine and engineering that require a massive amount of ego to begin with.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I had no idea. Grew up loving his books and reading that pained me. It’s like Sir Arthur Conan Doyle falling for that obvious “fairy” hoax.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was going to say. Entertaining writer, I enjoyed his work. But I don’t recall this motherfucker ever deliberately injecting a materialist perspective into his work

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

His writing was basically pulp Black Mirror novels. wot if monkeys were trained to fight with paddles? wot if your Dinosaur escaped? wot if your nanobots became sentient?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm a Marxist-Lenenist-Tyrranosaurist

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

Jesus Christ.

There is no question that men feel under attack, and psychologically beaten down. All sorts of horrible qualities are attributed to us: we are unemotional, we are brutal, we are violent, we are uncaring. We’re lousy lays. We don’t know how to do it. We don’t know how to find that clit. We don’t know how to satisfy our mates.

Just straight up "men are afraid women will laugh at them. Women are afraid men will kill them", but he thinks men are the ones getting a raw deal.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Really telling on himself there

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

I would say he's gone mask off but genuinely some of the other quotes from him make me realise that he in no way thought women would pick up on that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

KKKristian crusader pepe. qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

@gork is this true

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

So is Grok like ChatGPT on Twitter?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
141 points (99.3% liked)

Slop.

530 readers
465 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS