this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
526 points (98.9% liked)

News

29097 readers
4481 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Do they really think this will be "the golden move" to save Tesla? It's still Musk's company. The brand is toxic forever.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If he isn't forced to leave the board and divest all stock, Tesla is still dead.

Hell, even then...

Let it be very, very clear that the board had no problem with Musk's sieg heils. They only care because they've lost a massive chunk of their stock value. Don't support nazis. Don't support Tesla even if Musk has been completely removed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Elon needs to be removed from the board and all his stock returned to the company. Only then can they start looking at cleaning up their brand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

his whole board needs to be replaced, that is not handpicked by musk.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Should probably even rebrand at that point

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah no shit, get Nikola's name off that shit. Call it Edison Motors or something :)

naw, they'll rename it T and buy out T.com

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

They'll name it Xcars and the only way to buy them is through twitter dming grok.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

"Alright let's go, everyone in the T-mobile!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

Musk, with his DOGE, has even abolished the federal department responsible for ensuring that all cars coming to market follow compliant minimum safety regulations. Purely intentional so Musk can market his cars without any oversight. Safe or not. And dare you complain about that: Musk has an army of lawyers who will immediately take any negative publicity or negative comments from users to court. Need proof? https://apnews.com/article/tesla-china-musk-investigation-takeaways-422af6d3c6e7cc88173d12891e8c0a9a

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if DOGE nationalizes Tesla and puts it under Musk's command. Gotta have Cyber Tanks for the regime, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

"Please put down your weapon. You now have 15 seconds to comply."

Robocop's corporate dystopian nightmare is closer and closer to reality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

So Elon won’t be to blame when it’s worth less than, say, Ford?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Doesn't matter you goons could literally fund srs operations globally and everyone will still think you're Nazis

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

They’re going to bring Richard Bruhn back from the dead for it.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

The American consumer is a fucking idiot, this has a high chance of success as people forget about Elon and go back to buying them.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 19 hours ago (26 children)

I mean, in fairness, do we have any qualms with the rest of the company? Elon was directly responsible for pretty much all of the cyber truck decisions. But the regular Tesla's, aside from Elon prohibiting lidar and making false claims about self driving, are pretty decent. Without him, lidar might get implemented, the cyber truck will probably be scrapped, and real engineers will have their voices heard again.

Isn't that kind of what we want from a company? To realize their errors and remove the cancerous parts?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

He will still have a shitload of shares. I don't need to get into the nitty-gritty detail of whether I hate the company or its products; his stock in it is what allowed him to buy the election for Trump, so fuck Tesla.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

Are you assuming Elon would no longer own stock or have other ways he'd continue to profit from Tesla?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you want a redemption arc for this overvalued company so bad? You holding a bag?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

not OP, I wouldn't mind a redemption arc, they were pretty f'ing cool before he got there.

Everything that was on the market before tesla was a facimilie of a thousand other cars before it. They did something (for better or worse) different. Learning what not to do has power in itself.

After they took the leap, all of a sudden a lot of other companies started throwing out prototypes. I don't think the Volt I drive today would have happened if they didn't go there first.

Of course things got a lot worse as Elon butted in further and they started pushing QC out and cybertruck BS in.

I think they're likely irredeemable, but I'd like to see another company follow in their footsteps and keep pushing the tech further, not in a garbage dumpster direction, but in a simpler and more effective direction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Everything that was on the market before tesla was a facimilie of a thousand other cars before it.

Dude, every one of their generic sedan looking business fleet cars look so bleh that they make a mid-90s Dodge Neon look like mind-blowing body design.

The only thing they've produced in the last ten years that's even markedly different from the competition is the cybertruck, and that's only different in a bad way.

The "innovations" they brought to market are almost all shit I would never need nor want save the EV part of it. I cannot imagine ever wanting to drive a thing in which much of the control and all of the gauges are on a permanently mounted, great value iPad.

They are saying the resale value on these things is going through the floor, and honestly that's good because that's what they are worth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not talking about the body shape I could give a s*** less about that, matter of fact as places bring out different body shapes it kind of irrationally pisses me off. I'm talking about the design of the suspension and what they did with 360 camera coverage, how they handled the dual motors, The headlight emitters are actually multiple LED arrays and they can spell out shit in the headlights if they want to. All that crap was new and different. The only thing They really introduced that everyone else followed on and I hate is putting every blessed thing on a touch screen in the middle of the car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know the headlight thing was one of their innovations. Yet another thing I can blame them for because driving in front of one of them at night is like a mild form of torture.

I honestly don't want innovation at all in my car personally. If Honda could make another edition of the electric Fit I would buy it immediately and drive it until it collapsed into dust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

another edition of the electric Fit

Chevy's Bolt isn't too over the top

If you really want to get back to basics, this looks promising

https://www.theverge.com/electric-cars/655527/slate-electric-truck-price-paint-radio-bezos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I have a hang-up on Chevy because I owned two Cavaliers and they were terrible.

I have thought about it though, the Chevy Bolts look pretty similar to a Fit.

I'm was also considering going with one of the Hyundais if Honda can't get their act together.

I also don't think I want a truck.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

do we have any qualms with the rest of the company

Let's say they can him. Let's say he is somehow compelled to sell off stock until he's a minitority shareholder. His ego would not let that go. To say he's still filthy fucking rich would do a disservice to filth. You can't separate him from this mess. He'd just come back.

If he just disappeared tomorrow, no chance of repurchasing it, just maybe but we need to see:

  • Unions everywhere
  • OSHA up their ass
  • Put some fucking LiDAR on the cars
  • Reinvent quality control
  • Reinvent a safety program so that people can't burn to death locked in their car.
  • Fully support individual resale.
  • Fully support 3rd party service centers.
  • Every car is modified until it gets at least a three-star crash rating
  • All features are purchased with the car, if your seat has a heater, you can use it for free.
  • One feature is "we don't sell" or "store your data in a way that can identify you"
  • Car updates are transparent and unless a true safety hazard, optional.
  • No more of this screwing around with odometers to speed past warranty availability and everyone gets 30k more miles and another year because they were assholes.
[–] [email protected] 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Tesla was garbage before Elon came out as a Nazi. The quality control is non existent and has been.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, and that's another reason the company is failing, and I won't buy a car from them. But, that's not the point here, the point is Musk's stupid antics are having major consequences for him. The only value he's had for the company for years is as a mascot. The company succeeded so far as it has in spite of Musk, not because of him. Same for SpaceX.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

It's literally the opposite. The company has only done well in the past because of his antics. Tesla currently has a price per earning ratio of 155. It's only even this low because now people realize he's a Nazi. In the past, I've seen their price per earning ratio go as high as 350. If you know anything about stock fundamentals, you'd know that a normal ratio is around 20-30. Anything under would be a must buy stock and anything over would be a must sell, generally but not always.

But not Telsa. This isn't the first quarter sales have been down for Telsa. In the past when it happened, Elon would just do something stupid like launch a car into space, make a small flame thrower, or do some stupid meme shit and the price would still go up, despite a bad earnings call.

Since the first non roadster Telsa, they have been making shit quality cars and selling features as a subscription. If it wasn't for captain dipshit doing stupid stuff and fooling people into thinking he's smart, that company would have failed. Or he would have sold his portion back to the original owners and they company might have produced quality cars like the Roadster.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›