this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
634 points (98.5% liked)

News

28669 readers
4420 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It was never about 'legal' immigration, but always about upholding white supremacy," said one human rights lawyer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I bet the Trumpers are really looking forward to working as farm workers and hotel maids.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 days ago

The number of Americans who don't notice this Nazi shit is too damned high.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 days ago (2 children)

DHS claimed Monday that "the Biden administration abused the parole authority to allow millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. which further fueled the worst border crisis in U.S. history."

How are they "illegal aliens" (ignoring for the moment the dehumanization inherent to the phrase), if they were officially allowed to enter and then did?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I were to guess it would be because Biden is the one who let them in. And Trump is on a kick to literally undo everything that Biden has done in the last 4 years including wrecking our improved economy. It's all Trump cares about.

He did the same thing in 2016. Moved very quickly to wreck nearly everything that Obama had anything to do with. So that he could come back in a couple of years and try to fix all of it. Badly, I might add.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Weird, because I'm understanding the right correctly, Biden did NOTHING for the 4 years he was in office.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

dehumanization

Only for people who don’t understand the term

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Washington Dems who have tried to be pro-border security are part of the problem. A major part. Their support for racist xenophobic policies made it easier for the average American to lose sight of basic human equality.

In reality Trump wants all of these people to stay, and stay undocumented, so they can be used as borderline slave labor. The problem is that when Democrats talk about being tough on immigration, they may get easier for him to get away with evil policies like this. What worries me more is that I think many of those Democrats actually believed in their anti-immigrant racist xenophobic policies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Borderline slave labour? They want to arrest these fuckers and put them in interment camps and have them work for free. 5th amendment. Racist motherfuckers drilling slavery into the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Washington Dems who have tried to be pro-border security are part of the problem.

Because that's what Democratic voters want.

Most democrats are not leftists, they are liberals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Meh. I'm not sure how much I really believe this vs. the only candidates with the financial backing and media platform to get noticed in primaries tend to be the corpocentrists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What data do you need to leave your bubble? Issue polling, favorability polling, revealed preference, actual vote share? Americans, by a wide margin, want. Less legal immigration and stricter enforcement of immigration law — including detention and deportation.

It’s the unfortunate reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Okay, first of all, I was questioning your assertion. We should always be willing to critically examine our beliefs, or we'd still be beholden to the divine right of kings.

Second, while I appreciate that that's the current state of affairs, I think that no small part of it is due to Overton window drift and nobody being willing to stick their neck out and present a bold alternative vision for people to adopt. All we have is "Mexicans bad" and everything from "Mexicans bad lite" to "[pride flags][si se puede] Mexicans okay ish". You don't see anyone calling for taking a hammer to the system that makes immigration so fucked up in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Anecdote, so maybe my perception is biased:

My older brother is a racist asshole that, even though he vote democrats, he is very anti-immigration and doesn't like how "black people and mexicans are getting too much welfare", think immigration should be more strict, even though we are immigrants. Fits right Harris' "Secure the Borders" rhetoric. (He voted Harris btw)

My parents also think the Democrats are being too leinient on immigrarion, and that "illegals" are draining all the benefits.

But they don't see how the republicans don't care about "legal" or "illegal", its a dogwhistle referring to all immigrants.

But fortunately, I convinced my mom to vote Democrats.

Many of my relatives in NYC are also registered democrats. When we were in NYC, my relatives and my mother's friends all had the sentinment to vote democrats. (I was able to verify that some of my relatives were registered as Democrat, since its public info in New York) During family gatherings, and sometimes through WeChat calls that my parents make to relative and friends, they go "How are you doing" then like 5 minutes later "Oh yea thing are crazy, these Democrats are mishandling the 'Migrant Crisis', they letting these 'violent' people going around out and get welfare..." [Conversation is in Cantonese of course] And from what I can hear, both side of the call was agree with the "Democrats too weak on immigration" sentinment. (They put their calls on loudspeaker when I wanted some silence 😕) They are all first-generation immigrants.

I'm just like: 🙄...

So these people are quite common, unfortunately. Harris was pandering to these people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Do rich Republican donors really support this crap?

Even if we ignore the whole “give a shit about humans” thing, have the parasites that rely on exploiting the labor of others for their existence looked at birth rates in the developed world lately? Fighting over a shrinking labor pool generally means they can demand higher wages. They should be welcoming every person who will voluntarily move here.

And the rank and file useful idiots might want to think about any sliver of a chance they have to get things like social security.

load more comments
view more: next ›