this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
230 points (98.7% liked)

politics

22568 readers
5353 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


According to the website, federal grants worth $80,482,341, $9,798,986, $9,332,952, $8,633,114, $5,999,019, $5,270,574 and $1,549,589 are slated to be cut from the Kentucky State Cabinet for Health and Family Services, and grants worth $262,367,100, $50,662,718, $14,738,869, $10,882,234, $10,697,915, $10,352,840, $7,126,596, $4,741,123, $4,105,448, $2,994,627 and $1,868,495 are slated to be cut from the Indiana State Department of Health. The website says the cuts were announced on March 23, 2025.

The website says the $14,738,869 grant cancellation at the Indiana State Department of Health comes from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, although the allocation came to the local health department. This grant is one of two grant cuts listed with information, saying the grant allowed state and territory governments to purchase local, unprocessed foods from local producers, targeting historically “underserved” farmers, producers, fishers and small businesses.

The food purchased would then be distributed to schools and childcare institutions participating in the national school lunch program or child and adult care food programs.

Another similar grant for $7,126,596 that’s now slated to be cut allowed tribal governments to purchase unprocessed food from underserved farmers for distribution to families in need.

No other grant cuts on the website found by WAVE listed any description for what was being cut.

In his Team Kentucky update on Thursday, Gov. Andy Beshear acknowledged some of the grant cuts.

“We have received notice of grants being cancelled,” Beshear said. “It’s an unlawful cancellation and we’ll challenge it. These are contracts that we have. The contracts can only be terminated for cause, which means somebody did something wrong and they are trying to define cause as the pandemic. That’s not a legal argument.”

Beshear said the grants cancelled could mean the closure of health clinics.

“I am worried about the cuts,” Beshear said. “These are Americans, they have families. They chose to do civil service and now they are being told that their services are no longer needed. Some of them are being told it’s their fault, which is not true.”

Beshear said he was worried that the cuts could have an impact on the state’s response to bird flu as well, especially if the virus begins spreading person to person.


top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Another similar grant for $7,126,596 that’s now slated to be cut allowed tribal governments to purchase unprocessed food from underserved farmers for distribution to families in need.

This is so disgusting... $7 million is literally nothing to the federal government. A rounding error. A single atom of hydrogen in a drop in the bucket.

For a program which seems to be win/win/win.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Republican math doesn't like any ROI variables

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

This is why putting money hoarders in charge doesn’t make sense.

They fetishize just building a gigantic pile of money. Governments should be using the taxes they raise to do things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s about what Elon gets paid a day from the government. Disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wait, he's taking a salary? And it's that high??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/02/18/musk-8-million-a-day/

Not sure if he’s taking a salary but my guess is that this slime ball does nothing for free.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Using The New York Times' figures, Musk's companies would have made roughly $8 million per day from government contracts in fiscal year 2023. These figures are backed by usaspending.gov data, which shows that SpaceX and Tesla alone received $3.1 billion in federal grants that year.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Let's see if Mitch McConnell will effectively represent his state on this one...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Maybe his russian oligarch buddies can tip him a couple mil?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Just throw this on the pile of other illegal actions.

Yes, illegal. Congress - not the ~~king~~ president - has the power of the purse. Every single cut-by-fiat that Musk's goons have done is illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Not that I don't disagree with you but there is a political tactic that I believe was started with FDR or Kennedy...I can't remember exactly.

Basically, you are correct that Congress makes the law saying how the money is to be spent. However the executive branch decides when to release those funds. The president decided to wait until the last possible moment to release those funds, basically forcing departments to spend the money as quickly as possible before the end of the Fiscal Year since the funds are use it or lose it. So essentially the money is allocated and then clawed back.

The problem is that Trump and DOGE are doing this to raise money for tax breaks for the rich and for political grandstanding. And to accomplish Project 2025.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Also using russia to get elected - believe it or not - illegal.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why is everyone receiving these cuts not immediately calling them illegal? Don't worry about the cuts. Call them illegitimate and illegal. It is not up to Elon Musk to decide how the government spends money.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Because to do so, you must recognize them as a coup: bro is illegally using force to stop government function. This is, by definition, a coup.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Do we have a leopards at my face group? My bad, we do have one. https://lemm.ee/c/leopardsatemyface

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's a large one with about 5x the subscribers and more activity here: https://lemmy.world/c/leopardsatemyface

However, there's room in the Fediverse for both!