249
submitted 11 months ago by Mazdak@lemmy.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 103 points 11 months ago

More like bye-bit, am I right??

[-] Viri4thus@feddit.org 16 points 11 months ago

Angry upvote you horrible genius.

[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 63 points 11 months ago

I'm so glad I have no crypto of any kind. It's the wild west with no savings insurance, so once it's gone, it's gone.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -5 points 11 months ago

Depends which exchange you're using.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 11 months ago

Anybody who keeps their money on an exchange any longer than necessary is just asking for trouble. An exchange is like a public toilet. You get in, you shit, and you get the fuck out. You don't hang around in a public toilet.

Self custody or GTFO.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago

How does one get ones hands on a cold wallet?

[-] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 64 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My speculations:

  • "insecure from the start" - as in , the wallet was never that "cold"

  • with that amount of money, it's easy to imagine an "insider threat"

  • the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet

  • but probably it's a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago
[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Right next to their iq

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 28 points 11 months ago

It's a common misconception that a "cold wallet" is offline. It's still on the blockchain like any other wallet, it's just the keys that aren't on any network-connected computer.

It appears that in this case hackers managed to trick Bybit employees into entering the keys into a fake UI that gave the hackers access to them.

[-] Kualk@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

That’s room temperature wallet. It was used while claiming asset unused.

It is not cold storage anymore.

[-] Kualk@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Tricked or “tricked”.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

And this is the first time I have heard the word "musked" in this context.....

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

I have no idea. I guess they'll release a lot more info regarding this in the next few days.

And this is the first time I have heard the word “musked” in this context…

I think his English isn't good looking at the rest of the message. Might be "masked" instead.

[-] golli@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

What I don't quite understand is how there is 1.5 billion in a single wallet. Or how are these things structured?

This article puts their total assets under management at $15.7b, which are held in different cryptocurrencies with ethereum at just above $5b.

So I am wondering how they have more than 1/6 of their Ethereum in a single wallet or were these multiple that were connected and got compromised through the same vulnerability? How expensive is it to have more individual wallets? Would it not be feasible to have it split in something like $100m chunks? Or any other more moderate size.

[-] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Making more wallets would cost nothing more than a few hundred bytes of storage each for the keys. I have no idea why they wouldn't have split their funds into evenly sized wallets of, say, $1M each.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I recommend gloves.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Well, either it wasn't as offline as they all thought, or someone pulled off an epic inside job.

[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Social engineering, they convinced multiple key holders to sign a transaction.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

The weakest part of any secure system.

[-] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

With steely determination

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

The money is not gone, is just that someone else has it.

[-] Picasso 19 points 11 months ago
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

The money of the future ladies and gentlemen.

[-] TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Even regular banks can be hacked, this isn't just a crypto issue. Same group that hacked byebit also is responsible for the below:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Bank_robbery

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Seriously, who calls their online banking type site bye bit?

Having said that, I'll just go ahead and assume their security was barely existent, as per usual. I wonder if their CTO was actually s music teacher too.

[-] TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

This is the same hacker group that performed the Bangladesh Bank robbery, that attack the almost stole 1 billion, the only reason they got flagged was a typo. They did manage to steal 81 million though. Byebit does seem to have bad security though compared to Bangladesh bank.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Bank_robbery

[-] nick@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago
[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

I gotta get in on this hacking gig. Anyone know if any hacker groups are hiring?

/s for CSIS

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
249 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

80478 readers
4320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS