top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 524 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 137 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I know I've seen this on several websites today. What was everyone expecting? The only think I can think of is the old trope that Republican administrations are better for the economy. I have coworkers who were basically expecting miracles once Trump got into office. Things are probably gonna be bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t most (if not all) Republican administrations cause recessions or other damage to economies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Every Republican presidential term in my lifetime has had a recession start. None of the Democratic ones have...

    Regan; one started each term. First Bush had one in his term. Clinton had none in his 2 terms. Second Bush had a HUGE one each time (dot com and great recession). Obama had none in his 2 terms. trump had one in his first term (triggered by covid & shutdowns; which his (in)actions intensified...). Biden didn't have one (but; just barely... and only by the official definition [NBER]; he did have two negative real GDP quarters, so one could argue this point). Now we're starting trump's second term, so we'll see (it's pretty clear we'll have a recession within 2 years).

    This isn't really debatable unless you ignore the evidence. Stock market and real GDP growth are overall way higher under Democrat presidents. One link for reference (but many more are available): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-021-00912-y

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You are not wrong, I don't know where the other poster got their information, but Republicans almost always destroy the economy and the Democrats (kind of) fix it just in time to be blamed for the economy being bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 199 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    Unexpectedly? By who?

    Pretty sure tons of people said that if Trump takes office, inflation would skyrocket thanks to the tarrifs and all his other bullshit... This was entirely expected. It's the result we all knew was coming if he took office.

    If it were any Democrat in office right now, the media would have been pinning the blame harder than fighting games got blamed for violence in the 90s. Getting real sick of the narrative they're spinning.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 127 points 2 years ago

    Republicans just took power.

    Not unexpected at all.

  • source
  • [–] 104 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We hired one of the worst people in the world to lead us. It's a stretch to call this unexpected.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 98 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 75 points 2 years ago

    Unexpectedly?

    Yiyre kidding, right? I was quite literally waiting for this news. It never wss an if, just how bad

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What's unexpected about it? We re-elected a twice impeached anti-democratic felon rapist who utterly failed his last term.

    Every American who could rub brain cells together warned this would happen.

    Unfortunately, those people represent a minority in The Divided States of Dumbfuckistan.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    sounds like BBC is doing damage control for mango mussolini.

    the "unexpected" part is that the 3% is above the expected 2.9% rate. they're being coy; the title implies the increase is unexpected while the text shows it's just a tenth of a point above the rate that was expected.

    the editors are not uneducated people. I bet they speak English pretty well. the wording is deliberately misleading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 62 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    That article is carrying a lot of water for the Trump administration. Nobody knows why prices are going up!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 59 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    !leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

    Good job on voting to cancel out Joe Biden’s monopoly breakup because he didn’t do it fast enough

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago

    “Unexpectedly”

    If it’s anything to me, it’s unexpectedly low.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There's nothing unexpected about it. Have they not been paying fucking attention to what the Orange Jackass had been doing to is?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    who ever wrote this article is a total moron. Unexpectedly? noo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I fucking love how there is basically only one comment on this entire post

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    "Unexpectedly"? Everyone but the MAGA idiots expected it.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    The only thing unexpected here is the bad headline. Simply using the first sentence would be more accurate and meaningful

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    Wait. Unexpectedly for who? I certainly expected it. Most people I've talked with are also not surprised.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago*

    Then those interviewed and writing this article are idiots. 2024 article.

    Yet most mainstream economists say Trump’s policy proposals wouldn’t vanquish inflation. They’d make it worse. They warn that his plans to impose huge tariffs on imported goods, deport millions of migrant workers and demand a voice in the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policies would likely send prices surging.

    Sixteen Nobel Prize-winning economists signed a letter in June expressing fear that Trump’s proposals would “reignite’’ inflation, which has plummeted since peaking at 9.1% in 2022 and is nearly back to the Fed’s 2% target

    The Nobel economists noted that they aren’t alone in sounding the alarm.

    link.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Who could have expected this

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Maaaybe tarrifs are not that great

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago*

    Thank President Musk and his First Lad Trump.

  • source
  • [+] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [+] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›