this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
61 points (94.2% liked)

News

24550 readers
4084 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 hours ago

“Am trying to comply with the directive,” staffer said, but talking to is difficult when I can’t use pronouns. Even referring to the space station as is not allowed in conversation anymore.”

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So, remove he, she, they, them, it from the entire message and use only proper names.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (5 children)

To HR office,

Walking into the office this morning, I saw Tom in the parking lot, waved at Tom, and wished Tom a good morning. Tom then asked if I had seen Phil, wondering how "he"(!!!) was doing. I reminded Tom that of the newly-enacted no-pronouns policy and informed Tom that Tom should be careful in the future, or Tom could face consequences for not following policy!

As a good friend of Tom, I know Tom didn't mean to sound too liberal by it, but for Tom's own good I had to remind Tom of his mistake.

Sincerely, -Loyal NASA Employee

/s

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago

Is 'I' a pronoun?

Yep, FIRED!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

I am perfectly fine with this. Any time a republican refers to their daughter as “she,” that republican should spend a week in a leopard education camp breaking rocks!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

his mistake

Reported!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oops, guess I'm next on the chopping block right after Tom!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Initiating. Malicious Compliance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm really hoping the MC is turned up to 110% thrust. The results are going to be hilarious and tax dollars well-spent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Unless there's more text that isn't quoted, the article title doesn't seem to reflect the article body text.

This is what the article title says:

NASA instructs employees to remove pronouns from all work communications

This is what the article body says:

"In response to the Executive Orders, NASA has disabled features in id.nasa.gov and Teams that allows users to add pronouns in their display name in Microsoft Outlook and Teams," the email reads. "For users who have previously added pronouns to their display name, those pronouns will be automatically removed from the system this week."

It also references a signature block, says that it's standardizing on one, and I suppose that a current one could contain a pronoun:

"In addition," the email says, "NASA has adopted a uniform signature block for emails that are sent using any nasa.gov email address. All users (civil servants, contractors, and grantees) must modify their signature block to follow the appropriate signature block… the signature block should not include additional embellishment."

That body text doesn't seem to me to say that pronouns can't be used in work communications. It says that they are removed from three points:

  • The display name in Microsoft Outlook.

  • The display name in Microsoft Teams.

  • Email signature blocks. The quoted text doesn't mention pronouns, but one assumes that maybe one could contain them, though I'd think that there it's more-likely to be an honorific, like "Mr.", "Mrs.", etc.

I don't believe, based on that body text, that use of pronouns would be prohibited in, say, email text or chats, or whatever. Like, if someone sent out a message to their team, "Jim and I are going out to lunch, and he's offered to pay for anyone else on the team who is coming", from the article text, I don't believe that that'd be prohibited. As someone else points out below with some example text, that'd probably be impractical (especially given existing text that does use pronouns).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t believe, based on that body text, that use of pronouns would be prohibited in, say, email text or chats, or whatever.

So to comply with the rules, a user could use a Quick Steps default template of the Outlook for "new email" to automatically insert a sentence at the top of the body of every email:

"My pronouns are he/him" etc.

Since this isn't in the signature block, nor is it in the display name of Outlook or Teams, it would comply with the rules. If one were looking to do that you'd find the instructions here: link

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They just gotta keep finding ways around it until pronouns in the body are blocked as well.

You aren't allowed to declare your pronouns in the body either!

Then start writing all your emails in 3rd person and using them.

Eventually they'll just ban them in the body.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Hmmm so where can I add pronouns to my Teams username? I'd like to use this feature if possible 😁