this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
393 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19693 readers
3730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No further info in the article as it's breaking news. NBC broke into the inauguration to announce it.

Biden pardoned his entire family and their spouses as Trump directly threatened all of them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 305 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

An outgoing president needing to pardon his family pre-emptively because the incoming president is threatening them is well along the path to fascism.

Good job electing Trump you fucking morons. I hope that the consequences of your own actions hurt you more than they hurt the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago

... well along the path to fascism.

Oh, we're already there.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Good job electing Trump you fucking morons.

I'd like to thank the Gaza single issue voters and bLuEMagA mouth breathers, good job guys!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gaza was either not big enough to affect the result, or big enough where your candidate should have acknowledged it. You can’t have it both ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Social media manipulation like in 2016 should really be a part of the scapegoat club

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

FWIW, as an American, I really hope you're right. Because there is serious potential for us to fuck up the entire rest of the world for a very, very long time.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The US fucked up the world a long time ago, we're all entering the find out phase now.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey, we're Britain's fault!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 167 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Giving his family the last train car out of germany before the third reich shuts down the border.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

They may want do just that. Do anyone believe Trump will honor these pardons. Also are they even valid if they haven't been charged with a crime.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

It’s not about whether or not he honors them. The effectiveness of those preemptive pardons can be adjudicated by the SC. But there’s a couple of considerations on that front:

  • will the SC concur that blanket pardons in advance of any charges are actually allowed?
  • will Trump want to challenge that, since it would potentially kneecap any effort he makes later in that regard?

But also:

  • will Trump or the SC give a shit about the blatant hypocrisy and double standard if they do strike down this sort of thing from Biden, but let Trump do it? (IMO probably not)
  • if the SC gives a shit but Trump doesn’t, what’s to stop him using leverage and/or stochastic terrorism to help accelerate the conclusion of one or more justices’ tenure so he can slip someone more agreeable in?
  • will the judicial branch even exist in an independent fashion in 4 years?

TL;DR: who fuckin knows at this point

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Their validity has never been constitutionally challenged. It's not really been done much in the past, the notable example being Nixon and no one challenged that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

If you have to pardon your family since the future felon president is assuming office that has no safeguards against dictatorship, then you really should've just have the next guy arrested and sent to quackamole bay

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago

Perfectly normal country

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sad. In "The Land of the Free" you should never have to do this. We are well and truly fucked if this tribalism isn't put down. Cutting into our education has done irreparable damage.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Since when do pardons protect you from future crimes?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

They don't, but that's not the point. Trump has suggested that various members of Biden's family and inner circle I have done wrong and should be prosecuted. This is preemptively heading that off, ensuring that there cannot be a witch hunt.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In the US it's just basically untested, but it probably wouldn't hold up but you can still write it on the paper 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

With the Trump appointed supreme court it definitely won't hold up, but maybe it could delay whatever meaningless charges he can come up with long enough for another election. If we're lucky enough to have another real election that is at least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/333/

The power of pardon conferred by the Constitution upon the President is unlimited except in cases of impeachment. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment. The power is not subject to legislative control.

I don't think Trump would try it since he probably wants to use it on himself as well, but then again SCOTUS could be on some "rules for me, but not for thee" shit with it and it wouldn't matter anyhow.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think they are preemptive pardons in the sense that they are pardons for future crimes. They are pardons for unspecified past crimes that have not yet been charged. That is not unheard of. For example, Carted issued blanket pardons for everyone who dodged the draft during the Vietnam war whether they had been charged or not.

Where it is untested is if he tried to pardon himself. That has never been tested in the courts and is generally considered invalid on the premise that you cannot be the judge in your own trial.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

So basically it just sets the statue of limitations of everything to 0?

So if we find out one of these people raped someone at some point before this pardon, there will be no justice?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Presidential pardons are only for federal crimes. Rape is likely a state crime. I haven't checked

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I really have a hard time with this position that there’s a “peaceful transfer of power” yet there’s a fear in the outgoing administration expecting retribution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The next few years will need a shitload of popcorn lmao

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Years? I give it a month... 25% tarrifs start 2/1.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I hope everyone gets what they voted for.

Including those who didn't vote

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I don't care, and frankly don't blame him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

People in Guantanamo are rotting away but Bidens family must be protected.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Both things can be true

load more comments
view more: next ›