top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 137 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_health-savings-account-issue-spotlight_2024-04.pdf

CFPB is aware of the issue. I'm guessing that the incoming administration is not going to care about fees.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And thank GOD! if a Business wants to Steal ALL my Money that just makes them GOOD BUSINESSMEN! If I wanted Rights I would Lift up my Bootstraps!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 97 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is because you are not the customer. Your employer is the customer, they are the ones who get to choose the HSA provider for their employees. You are the goods to be sold. The HSA provider is simply harvesting profits.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    "You are not the customer, you are the product" is true so often, but in many cases (like this one) it doesn't really apply.

    First off, "not the customer but the product" is an inherently antagonistic relationship. Your goals are opposed to Facebook's, for instance, because you want to spend less time on the platform and you want to interact with friends and not brands, but Facebook wants the opposite of both. But with HSA administration, your goals and your employer's goals are aligned: you both want someone who will quickly and painlessly manage your account without being a pain.

    Second, "not the customer but the product" implies an undisclosed, extractive payment occurring behind the scenes. TikTok is harvesting a great deal of data from you and selling it to other companies. You are the product in that your data has value. But with HSA administration, the product is just the management of your HSA money; there's no under-the-table dealing going on here (or there shouldn't be); they're getting paid by your company for their services.

    Third, "not the customer but the product" relationships are entirely one-way; you have no way to impact the providing company beyond just not using their services. They do not, will not, and at some level can never care about your experience beyond making it as minimally useful to you to keep you on the platform. But that HSA provider desperately needs your company's business, so if enough of your coworkers raise a stink and get your company to complain, they will make a change.

    In actuality, "not the customer but the product" ignores the unfortunate reality of most HR/payroll service companies in this case: they're just the lowest bidder, contracted at the bottom dollar to provide the cheapest services possible, because your employers don't have to use their services and don't care about your experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I left two cents in mine and just left it as is. I like to think that every time those pirates send me a letter telling me I have 2 cents left or send me checks which I don’t cash it costs them money.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Drain it to zero and then let them auto close it for inactivity. Or keep it open forever since there’s no admin fee.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    The admin fee is $0. Can you just transfer all of the money out and keep the account empty?

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    This is exactly what I do. Spend all the money out of the account and delete my login. Done this at least a couple times and I’ve never had an issue. What are they gunna do? File a bullshit claim on my credit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Honest question: why? I’ve only been able to use an HSA once, and I thought the big advantage is that it’s your money you can keep and use whenever. Can’t you just keep using it normally, ideally save some of it?

    In my case, my ex got it put in our divorce judgement that I would carry “traditional” insurance, so I knew that my HSA had no future

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    HSAs are an annoying attempt to fix US health insurance. They are tax free (meaning your money goes farther), but you can only contribute to them if you have a high deductible health insurance plan.

    Additionally, you are limited to a couple thousand a year in contributions and that money can only be used for approved health expenses. The slight upside is that the money won't ever go away, meaning you can keep building up your HSA and even invest it.

    Where it's gotten weird is that many people actually just use it as tax deffered savings, as after 65 (I think) the money becomes general use.

    However, this means HSAs primarily benefit wealthier people by only really being accessible to those who already have insurance and have excess money to contribute.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That schedule of fees looks like it's straight from the 1980's.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Reminds me of when my ISP who was "no contract" had a cancellation fee. Like I have to pay money to stop being billed? Something about that feels very backwards.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    fee fee fee fee fee fee

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    When I was looking for a non-employer HSA, there's a lot of providers out there with not-exactly-predatory terms. All kind of fees or restrictions that you wouldn't find on other types of checking/saving/brokerage accounts. I ended up a Lively, but they added some investment/transfer fees when Schwab bought Lively's investment partner TDA.

    I suspect it's partly because most HSA are determined by the employer, so someone in HR can be induced to choose a fee-laden plan if it's easier for them, and partly because the tax benefits are so great that it still makes sense even after paying a $20 junk fee here and there.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    This is not mildly infuriating. This should just be illegal. Paying money to close your account is beyond infuriating

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    HSAs are a misdirect to get you to ignore how shitty high deductible plans are. Never take the high deductible plan.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I save money with the HSA/high deductible. I always plan around using 100% of deductible. Premium plus HSA contribution is less than the PPO option.

    I'll never pick an 80/20 plan. They generally charge more and cover less.

    And I'm an old hag and have recently got cataract surgery in both eyes, hearing aids, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    HSAs are also a way to get healthy people away from wanting universal health care by catering to their self interest, just like how IRAs were intended to let people with money invest in retirement which eroded support for social security.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It really depends. My company, you always do the high deductible. The OOP Max is only $5k compared to $13k for the other. The difference in premiums plus my employers contribution to the HSA are more than the difference between the two deductibles. The plans cover the same stuff. I don't really get why they're set up how they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    The fact that you get charged for a paper statement and that is not an opt in is more infuriating.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›