[-] Vent@lemm.ee 170 points 8 months ago

In actual human terms:

"Yes, I'll handle this problem for you, but I'll need $0.000001 to cover the cost of the shared infrastructure."

"Fuck off"

lobbies government to force you to do it for free

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 94 points 1 year ago

I still have never been able to see white and gold

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 205 points 1 year ago

Nah. It's engagement bait, plane and simple

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 133 points 1 year ago

It is a universal axiom that any question starting with "Will Trump ever face consequences for..." can be answered with "no".

If, instead of prison, Trump was faced with a free luxury mansion on a private island and a $1B/yr pension to live out the rest of his years Epstein style, Kamala may have had a chance. As soon as the alternative included a hint of repercussions for his actions, the universe simply could not allow it.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 102 points 1 year ago

� is used to represent an invalid character, so it makes sense that it'd appear often when bad data is being rendered (or good data is being rendered improperly).

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 131 points 2 years ago

I'm at a loss

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 2 years ago

Fake. Squidward is eating a Krabby Patty.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 171 points 2 years ago

But... it's cybersecurity. What is a "brief visual and non-intrusive room inspection" even looking for? Anonymous masks? Green terminals with scrolling text? People shouting "enhance" and/or "I'm in"?

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 89 points 2 years ago

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible. One fucker that owns a coal company was able to tank all meaningful climate bills and there was nothing Biden or anyone else could do about it. You can forget about any progressive policies in that environment, lol. Biden did well with the tools he was given.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 93 points 2 years ago

Only if you're using a bad font that doesn't differentiate between I and l

77
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/nflmemes@lemmy.world
585
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
163
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

25
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 172 points 2 years ago

"If it can be done and it is done, for example, for crimes such as child pornography, for intellectual property, which is stealing, they should have to do it too." - LaLiga chief Javier Tebas

Ah yes, two equivalent crimes: CSAM and... um... watching sports without paying

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 95 points 2 years ago

Damn and Facebook ratted them out

193
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
36
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/RedditMigration@kbin.social
288
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/reddit@lemmy.ml
99
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml
69
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/syncforlemmy@lemmy.world

It's been nearly 10 days, hand it over Google!

999
Woke Adapter (lemm.ee)
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
-11
submitted 2 years ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
43
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/cat@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3610354

Looking to pick up a self cleaning litterbox but there are a lot of options. The coolest one I've seen by far is the CatGenie Automatic Cat Box, but it's nearly $500 and seems a little overkill.

I've also seen that the PetSafe Litterbox is a very popular choice, but it uses proprietary litter refills and crystal litter when I'd prefer clay litter.

I've been getting away with a $15 do-it-yourself litterbox just fine for a while, but I think I (and my cat) would appreciate something that doesn't require daily maintenance. Something as simple as an automatic rake would be interesting.

My main goals are:

  1. Requires as little maintenance as possible while keeping my cat happy and the smell under control
  2. No proprietary lock-in (I can use my own litter)
  3. Doesn't break the bank
  4. Built well, won't break / easy to fix / good warranty / cheap enough that I can just buy a new one if it breaks

While I am looking for budget friendly options, I'm also curious on the more expensive options. I can't imagine what justifies spending $700 on a Litter-Robot when emptying a litterbox manually isn't that bad and the CatGenie is $500 and promises zero-maintenance. Have you had good luck with premium options like that?

view more: next ›

Vent

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago