[-] [email protected] 170 points 3 weeks ago

In actual human terms:

"Yes, I'll handle this problem for you, but I'll need $0.000001 to cover the cost of the shared infrastructure."

"Fuck off"

lobbies government to force you to do it for free

[-] [email protected] 94 points 5 months ago

I still have never been able to see white and gold

[-] [email protected] 205 points 6 months ago

Nah. It's engagement bait, plane and simple

[-] [email protected] 133 points 8 months ago

It is a universal axiom that any question starting with "Will Trump ever face consequences for..." can be answered with "no".

If, instead of prison, Trump was faced with a free luxury mansion on a private island and a $1B/yr pension to live out the rest of his years Epstein style, Kamala may have had a chance. As soon as the alternative included a hint of repercussions for his actions, the universe simply could not allow it.

[-] [email protected] 102 points 10 months ago

� is used to represent an invalid character, so it makes sense that it'd appear often when bad data is being rendered (or good data is being rendered improperly).

[-] [email protected] 131 points 11 months ago

I'm at a loss

[-] [email protected] 171 points 11 months ago

But... it's cybersecurity. What is a "brief visual and non-intrusive room inspection" even looking for? Anonymous masks? Green terminals with scrolling text? People shouting "enhance" and/or "I'm in"?

[-] [email protected] 89 points 11 months ago

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible. One fucker that owns a coal company was able to tank all meaningful climate bills and there was nothing Biden or anyone else could do about it. You can forget about any progressive policies in that environment, lol. Biden did well with the tools he was given.

[-] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago

Only if you're using a bad font that doesn't differentiate between I and l

71
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 84 points 2 years ago

Have they considered doubling the number of prisons and providing police with tanks?

585
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
163
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

25
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

[-] [email protected] 172 points 2 years ago

"If it can be done and it is done, for example, for crimes such as child pornography, for intellectual property, which is stealing, they should have to do it too." - LaLiga chief Javier Tebas

Ah yes, two equivalent crimes: CSAM and... um... watching sports without paying

[-] [email protected] 95 points 2 years ago

Damn and Facebook ratted them out

193
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
36
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
288
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
99
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
69
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's been nearly 10 days, hand it over Google!

999
Woke Adapter (lemm.ee)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
-11
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
43
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3610354

Looking to pick up a self cleaning litterbox but there are a lot of options. The coolest one I've seen by far is the CatGenie Automatic Cat Box, but it's nearly $500 and seems a little overkill.

I've also seen that the PetSafe Litterbox is a very popular choice, but it uses proprietary litter refills and crystal litter when I'd prefer clay litter.

I've been getting away with a $15 do-it-yourself litterbox just fine for a while, but I think I (and my cat) would appreciate something that doesn't require daily maintenance. Something as simple as an automatic rake would be interesting.

My main goals are:

  1. Requires as little maintenance as possible while keeping my cat happy and the smell under control
  2. No proprietary lock-in (I can use my own litter)
  3. Doesn't break the bank
  4. Built well, won't break / easy to fix / good warranty / cheap enough that I can just buy a new one if it breaks

While I am looking for budget friendly options, I'm also curious on the more expensive options. I can't imagine what justifies spending $700 on a Litter-Robot when emptying a litterbox manually isn't that bad and the CatGenie is $500 and promises zero-maintenance. Have you had good luck with premium options like that?

view more: next ›

Vent

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago