48
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I have recently been interested in organizing more (outside of animal rights and anti-racism) and was looking to join a communist org. Unfortunately the choice for these kind of movements is incredibly limited where I live. I found a trot org that is linked to IMT near me and was willing to give them a chance as choice is limited.

After reading their manifesto, I think I won’t bother... Here’s a translation of some paragraphs.

Our position is very simple: in every struggle, we always take the side of the oppressed against the oppressors. But this general position is not precise enough. We must add that our position is essentially negative. This means that we are opposed to all forms of oppression and discrimination - whether they target women, people of color, homosexuals, transgender people or any other minority.

However, we firmly and categorically reject “identity” politics which, under the pretext of defending the rights of this or that group, play a reactionary role, dividing the working class, weakening its unity and providing invaluable aid to the ruling class.

The labor movement has been contaminated by a whole series of ideas that were alien to it. Postmodernism, identity politics, “political correctness” and other oddities have been smuggled in from the universities by the “left” petty bourgeoisie, who act as a conveyor belt for reactionary ideas alien to the working class.

Stemming from “postmodernism”, identity politics have confused the brains of many students. But these ideas have also been introduced into the workers' movement, where they are used as weapons by the bureaucracy to combat the most resolute militants.

They have a whole FAQ section dedicated to how inclusive writing is wrong because it divides the working class ffs.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I’m not that familiar with trots, but I would hope they are not all reactionnary shitheads. Still I was getting excited of having a leftist org near me... Guess I’ll take the advice of looking for a remote org as I don’t have the energy to start an org at the moment.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Trot orgs aren't really known for being reactionary shitheads, they're more known for having bad ideas about AES and for forming splitter orgs at the drop of a hat. Of course all the splitter orgs have to have different opinions on something or another, so they've each gotta have one bizarre take or another.

They're also known for making newspapers, of course.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Some aren't, but a lot have one or two things they have a bizarrely awful takes on. And I don't mean disagreements over history, theory or praxis (for example, wsws defending people like Harvey Weinstein as "witch hunt" victims).

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I am in a trot org and it's very good about minorities. I presented a talk about trans lives vs the far right in my country and it was very well received.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Nice to hear your talk went well :)

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

This is something Jordan Peterson would write if he decided to LARP as a leftist instead of a Tradcath.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The org I’m in allows “remote” members to an extent. We’re in a huge state (takes like 14 hours to drive across), so just based on pure logistics we have local members who do day to day shit irl, and we have further afield folks who we only see once in a while but who help out with admin stuff, or designing posters or making social media designs or whatever. Might be worth looking into if there’s something similar you could join.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

That’s actually not a bad idea, I might look into it thanks!

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I am sure there is a rich history of why this movement split from the ICFI. Or whatever, one split first decades ago.

I have even expressed a desire to exist quietly but with legal protections. I tolerate people's bile around me to survive. But it's a dead-end. Bigots are narcissists who can never be co-opted into delivering socialism. Self-serving imperialist social democracy, no doubt, but they will demand countless unnecessary human sacrifices for it.

You are in an all-important minority whose impact must be felt. Start your own org, no matter how futile it feels.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Ironic how "not splitting up the working class" is their reasoning for allowing bigots into their org, and now they clearly just split the working class by letting these bigots in at the expense of minority group members. Best move for any functioning organization is to always keep bigots out, just game theory proves it. 1 bigot in the group - potentially many minority groups leave. Net loss in members. Too risky, even capitalist companies figured this out and some of these companies are going to shoot themselves in the foot by letting them in now that anti woke is vogue.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Those people that join are going to become tomorrow cons. So many where trots in the past as it is. Your rejecting those who have nothing to lose for those who could just call it a phase.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Orgs around me are:

  1. Boomers. Have never said a word about racism or LGBT stuff. The CCP sends them greetings
  2. Boomers. Have said one word about racism. Have never said a word about LGBT stuff
  3. More sectarian boomers. Have never said a word about racism or LGBT stuff.
  4. Young energetic people who know how to TikTok. Says sensible stuff about racism and LGBT stuff. They're also a bunch of Trots who shit on Stalin.
[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sorry, I see this a lot bit never got what it's supposed to mean.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You have a good nose for bullshit. "Identity politics" have been central to successful organized Marxism for over a century. Attributing them to 'post-modernism' is itself a contemporary idea that divorces them unessecerily from class politics.

Most communist states always had specific women's labor and political groups, as well as usually catering towards the needs and problems of ethnic minorities. The need for this is well recognised even as far back as Marx and Engels themselves, with Eleanor Marx being one of the prominent caretakers and disseminaters of Marx's writing into the hands of the continental European left after his death, with the Bolsheviks truly being the party that insisted on a multicultural doctrine, having leaders from many different ethnicities and nationalities, and insisting on native language and ethnic conservation programs (something which even the modern CPC continues today). It is in fact a rejection of material support of this multi-cultural heritage that exemplifies the worst revanchist and reactionary elements of modern Russia, which is now experiencing a greater cultural flattening (loss of non-Russ language and culture) than ever existed during the Soviet period.

The idea that we can just become one big working class is an idealistic model of class politics that doesn't represent historically successful communist parties. In order to get to that point, as that is where our power lies, through our labor, we will have to address matters of identity. We don't get there by insisting they don't exist.

Edit: This catering toward ethnic minorities within the party btw, was one of the essential wedges used by the 'National Socialists' to distinguish themselves from communist parties. You know we are in a bad place theoretically when even supposed communist organizations are parroting literal Nazi propaganda towards organizing the working class.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The idea that we can just become one big working class is an idealistic model of class politics that doesn't represent historically successful communist parties.

You mean by pretending there are no oppressions between members of the same class ?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Essentially, yes.

Histories and current oppression and discrimination have to be addressed to understand the role of dominant identity workers participation in this discrimination and how it weakens the cause of labor as a whole. This is not "identity politics" it is the very essence of 'From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.'

If there is to be a vanguard party movement, then it is within their ability to address the needs of identity. The inability to do so suggests a lack of understanding of what Marxism is about, which is a further postulate of liberal thinking, a rejection of the libertarian idea that the needs of individuals are necessarily opposed by the needs of society, instead falling for a stripped down version of Marxism often postulated by western academia that is essentially vulgar class politics and materialism. Being a dialectic materialist doesn't mean a rejection of ideals, it just means understanding that any ideals that are not rewarded by a material base are built upon sand. As such, any worker's movement that does not seem to empower dispossessed minority groups will soon find itself without that support, which is essential, not only for our ideals but for pragmatism as well. Nothing crumbled faster than 'Marxists and communists' who sought to subsume all identities into stripped down "Well we are all the working class, so you should just be on our side." ideology and practice.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

any ideals that are not rewarded by a material base I’m not sure I understand this sentence, could you get into it more or give me some book recommendation on this?

BTW I’m digging more into their position and found this bit again about identity politics:

These claim that some parts of the working class benefit from the oppression of others - which is in essence the same lie as the capitalists' claim that oppressed workers take other people's jobs.

What the fuck is this first part?! Do these people not understand systemic racism and how it can up to a point benefit working class white people? I mean also living in the imperial core is literally benefiting from the oppression of the periphery.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You should read Marx and Engels 'The German Ideology' to get a firmer grasp of how this whole dialectical materialism thing is supposed to work.

That said, the basis is so simple that it has literally been smuggled into conditional psychology, despite being formulated before Freud was even born.

Basically, human ideals and ideology are not grounded in approaching a divine will (as Hegel would say) but in what is rewarded by classes of ownership. As the ruling (ownership) class changes and benefits from changes in production, so to does the ideology created by them.

An ideology that does not materially benefit the ruling class is largely phased out losing it's 'conditional' (this bit is my words not Marx or Engel) properties on the working class. Literally, ideologies are skinner boxes for the ruling class based on what the current model of material production is. An ideology without some type of material reward system will (statistically speaking) be discarded in favor of one that does. There will always be outliers, but that does not make something the primary ideology of the era. The goal of the revolutionary then, is to seize the means of production by any means available, and orient them towards rewarding an ideology that has communist/socialist ideals, which should be oriented around the ideals of the working class, as the primary creators of value, not the ideals of the ruling class, who are parasitical on that labor-value.

It's incredibly unclear to me how these trots get to their conclusions outside of a complete reactionary rejection of Marxist-Leninist analysis. It's basically "Lenin said there are labor aristocrats, so therefore there aren't."

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the recommendation and the explanation, I’ll add it to my reading list.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Lol I talked to some RevComs a few months ago. When I tried discussing labor politics with them they had no idea what I was talking about. Then they told me they knew someone who was organizing at the company I worked for. Then they asked me to join the party.

After a month of trying to get in touch with the person organizing, they told me that the effort had stalled out, they were never really involved to begin with, and they were probably going to quit in the near future. Then they asked me to join the party.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Stay far away from anything IMT. Aside from having bad takes they are notorious for mistreating their members.

Are there any orgs in your area running anti-imperialist protests? Having good international takes can be a good barometer for a generally good org.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8421 readers
156 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS