this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
349 points (100.0% liked)

Nonsense

0 readers
245 users here now

funny, silly, whatevs.

Rules

keep it comedic

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You can also boil them, mash them or stick them in a stew.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sorry what are we talking about? Can you say it again, very slowly, and enunciate carefully?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Pro...bate...hoes

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Don’t forget making homemade grenade launchers with them.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wait til you find out about corn

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Jesus, I need my eyes checked. And my mind. I did not read it as "corn" at first glance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I read it as com at first.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Mental keming

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

One word: brassica. Ok, two: brassica oleracea

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Corn has entered the chat....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I just wish it were nutritionally any good for us.

Corn is:

  • Liquid Sugar Replacement (worse than sugar)
  • Starch (higher calorie, difficult to digest)
  • Cattle Feed (they also can't digest it, leading to gut rott)
  • Fuel (can't eat fuel)

But I can down several bags of Frito Lays Cornchips. Honey BBQ Twists are the bomb. If they sold those in family or party size I'd probably have fatty liver disease.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Yep basically no nutritional value besides providing glucose. It’s why people in South America whose diet has been mostly corn and corn based products are super short.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

(worse than sugar)

Eh, that's not settled science. It's terribly complex and we don't really know.

There's some research that seems to suggest all sugars are really bad for you, even those from fruits.

I'm any case, any added sugar is for sure bad for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Added or not, sugar is bad for you. You can get liver disease by eating fruit.

That said, processed sugar is worse because it is more easily taken up by the body and makes the insuline response worse.

Also, processed food is bad for you on top of sugars.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

And onions. The trifecta of going in everything.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Making vodka from potatoes (instead of grain) was so awesome that the woman who did it became the first female university professor in Sweden.

Edit: no it wasn't Martha Stewart you fucking idiot

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Potato is not a vegetable.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the definition of vegetable is very vague. anything from a plant can be vegetable.

i personally prefer using words like root, leaves, fruits and nuts, but strawberries put that to the test

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Anything from a plant can be a vegetable

Is bread a vegetable because it is made of wheat?

Edit: you can downvote me but you're still incorrect. It isn't vague and potato is objectively not a vegetable. Same goes for grains like wheat, corn, and rice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're also dumb and wrong from the very loose culinary definition btw, potatoes aren't a grain, they fall under the "root VEGETABLE" category along with beets, carrots, onions etc...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Never did I claim that a potato is a grain. Culinarily, I am correct.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (10 children)

So you might be arguing with the wrong person if you want to pull culinary technicalities. When I open my copy of Escoffier Le Guide Culinaire to page 498 I find Potatoes listed in the vegetables section

But wait, let me check my copy of Jaques Pepins Complete Techniques ah, okay, on page 323 he describes potatoes as "a versatile vegetable". Maybe The Joy of Cooking? Ah, here, on page 245, under vegetables, and a root vegetable puree recipe featuring potatoes. Fascinating...

I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the CIA textbook currently though I'm fixing that soon, and my Japanese cooking technique textbooks don't specifically categorize potatoes. Want me to get back to you when I can borrow a copy of Modernist Cuisine from my chef friend?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Mf busted out the hard copy sources from the culinary greats. I'm dead.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I am curious what your define it as, because you've ruled out vegetable and grain.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetable

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vegetable

a usually herbaceous plant (such as the cabbage, bean, or potato) grown for an edible part that is usually eaten as part of a meal

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Tell that to the National Potato Council. Potatoes may take the place of grains in some dishes, but that doesn't make them a grain. Radishes, beets, turnips, and other tubers may also be used as a starchy base for a dish, but I doubt you'd question the legitimacy of them as vegetables

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Just curious, what would you define as a vegetable?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Culinarily, you can define vegetables using the basic food groups. Grains and starches are a distinct group and not part of the vegetable food group, despite the fact that they come from plants. It is easy to see that not all food that is plant-based is, culinarily, a "vegetable" when you consider things like fruits and nuts, which people have no trouble distinguishing from vegetables.

And yes, many things we culinarily consider vegetables actually fall under the scientific definition of fruit, and some "fruits" do not fall under that definition.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Starches are just something a vegetable has, though, not something they are. Like protein and fiber.

If you exclude anything with starch from being vegetables, you're also excluding beans, squash, lentils, carrots, peas, parsnips, corn, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Even if i consider potatoes vegetables, i wouldnt consider vodka a vegetable because its made out of potatoes

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Strong Principal Skinner meme vibes.

"Am I wrong about potatos?

...no, it's Wikipedia, Britannica, Merriam-Webster, and basically everyone on reddit that's wrong!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Of course it's a fruit, the apple of earth

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Cassava/manioc/yuca: I'm you, but better.

load more comments
view more: next ›