I was planning to donate the couple bucks I had left over from the year to the charity called “San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance”, I was doing a background check on CharityNavigator and they gave the charity full ratings so it seemed good.

Then I stumbled upon the salary section. What the fuck? I earn <20k a year and was planning to contribute to someone’s million dollar salary? WHAT.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/951648219

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 201 points 2 years ago (36 children)

This is more of a system issue than bad behavior of an individual charity.

Charities can underpay a little bit, because working for a charity has its own appeal. But if you want a talented, experienced person to run your org, you have to consider what they could make if they worked for someone else. San Diego is not a cheap city, and has its fair share of CEO positions.

If you really want to stretch your dollar though, local food banks are probably a better bet.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 115 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Talent and experience isn't that rare. Nor does executive compensation correlate with performance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] [S] 66 points 2 years ago* (12 children)

    I’m not living in america. In my country this really isn’t a thing. Most charities have a sort of “everyone gets the same salary” policy which is usually around the median salary in the country.

    This charity was just running a cool project I wanted to donate too. I dont care what the american system is like, no one deserves 1 million a year while there are people starving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, it's a tough call to make. It's like those car donation things. Like 90% of your car's value goes to the company managing the sale, but that's still 10% to the charity that they wouldn't have anyway. Unless you want to deal with selling your own car, and giving the charity the money, it still does some good.

    I suspect a $1M salary isn't too insane for a CEO if they bring tangible value to the company. Also, with a lack of shareholders to answer to like in a publicly traded company, their motivations probably align with the cause they're supporting. It's not like they're going to sell off a shitload of assets to bump stock price and escape with a golden parachute.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 135 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    https://sandiegozoowildlifealliance.org/sites/default/files/2024-07/2023-SDZWA-Annual-Report.pdf

    Total revenue per year is 420 million.

    Concessions and cleaning staff typically make 35k-40k. Zookeepers ~50k.

    These 5 employees. Amount to .8% of the yearly operating budget, while the sum of all other employees totals up to 10% of the 400 million dollar operating budget.

    I’m not making any judgements, just offering the numbers.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    They pay cooks less than $20/hour in a city with an average rent of $3000/month. I've got no problem passing judgement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    They pay cooks less than $20/hour

    So their cooks get paid less than 'cooks' at McDonald's? Fast food minimum wage is $20/hour throughout California.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 88 points 2 years ago

    This is a good reminder that you can look up Form 990 for any nonprofit (they are required to submit one), which includes any staff that make over $100k.

    https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/

    Also, it looks like the “salaries” you found are total compensation, which also includes medical and retirement benefits. The CEO’s salary is around $600k, but also got a $300k+ bonus.

  • source
  • [–] 85 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    For a second I thought this was a hit list.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    My wife works for a non-profit where the Executive Director (CEO if you will) cannot make more than 5x what the lowest paid person makes. Wish more non-profits would adopt something similar

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    You earn less than 20k? Save your money, volunteer your time! Much more productive and rewarding!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Blood banks. “Your blood saves lives”. Is actually “We can sell your blood to hospitals for $200 per pint”. Check the salaries of the non-profit blood bank CEO and board. I would gladly share my blood if I’m paid $100 per pint, or if they gave insurance vouchers for a free pint of blood, to avoid insurance charging $1000-3000 to get a pint back. In fact they could just call it “blood insurance” where your premium is paid in regular blood donations.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I’ve given up on charity. They’ve lobbied sites like Charity Navigator to not count executive compensation as a negative. I’m sick of capitalism ruining everything.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Charities and billionaires are the polar extremes of the same policy failure. In a healthy society neither should exist, and when they do they should be tolerated for a minimal time as possible.

    Charities and philanthropy exist to permit governments and corporations to abdicate their social responsibilities.

    When the work a charity does is properly valued by a society, it’s economy would never need to carve out a special, nonprofit status for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Was put to me at a young age that non-profit only means they spend any revenue they get before it gets to the bottom line to show up as a gain or loss. Always good to sort out the shady from the legit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Give it to the San Diego food bank instead. It's a good charity from what I've seen, and I've volunteered there at least half a dozen times.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What the heck is a chief philanthropy officer?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I took a huge pay cut when I worked for a non profit. :(

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Mutual aid is where it's at.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Charities are good business. That's why there are a lot of them.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No affiliation, and I've never donated to them, but their financials are far from the worst:

    There are many charities that don't spend the majority of donations on the actual program. Like, wtf...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This is why I always tell donation canvasers to shove it and make their rich ceo pay for it in full. Nothing worse then a billionaire CEO for loblaws underpaying someone to ask for handouts.

    I basically refuse to assist any and all charities at this point because of exactly what you have shown in your images. It's disgusting.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Damn I'm in the wrong nonprofit lol. Building, activity and pay & benefits for 7 employees come in under $400k total budget/expenses and we have distributed millions and millions of pounds of food in the last few years.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Management and marketing bloat is extremely common for nonprofits, unfortunately. Especially large ones.

    Ones that don't do that exist too, but it's a thing you have to be wary of.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The head of the American Red Cross makes about 750k, last I heard.

    Whether or not that's justified either, I think we can all agree it's a little bit larger of an organization with more responsibility to juggle.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I suggest donating to your local wild animal rescue/rehabber. They're all volunteer based. They receive $0 public money. The public rarely sees the work they do. They're doing physically and mentally taxing work purely for the love of animals.

    They typically all have a donation page, and many have Amazon Wishlists where you can send them cleaning, maintenance, or medical supplies directly if you're worried about the money going to something you might not intend.

    Nothing will go to people. You won't have to question if you're really help an animal that may or may not exist in a country you'll never see. They're your neighborhood animals.

    As the !superbowl@lemmy.world person here, I look specifically for a raptor rehabbers to donate to, and I share links to those rescues worldwide.

    I can't find my link to the world rescue database, but for a US based one, you can look here or just Google up "wild animal rescue near me" and you should get some options.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›