top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 324 points 2 years ago (43 children)

This is my ~8 month old work laptop.

Is a Dell.

2 usb c not pictured.

You have options.

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 240 points 2 years ago (50 children)
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    That's the way to do it. I just wish Framework had a better selection of modules available and had more module bays on their laptops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 195 points 2 years ago (49 children)

    I dunno - I’m pretty sure I’d choose the modern MacBook Pro’s ports over any of these other options.

  • source
  • hideshow 49 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    If you got that kind of money to spend on a laptop, sure. I really don't.

    Edit: to be clear, I know this is a stack of Mac's in OPs picture, but the development that the entry models have basically no ports at all is a more recent development. Having to pick the pro just to be able to connect your stuff without dongles or hubs is a bit insane considering the price (and price difference).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (42 replies)
    [–] 166 points 2 years ago (134 children)

    Fuck firewire. Glad it's dead. USB C is the best thing to happen to peripherals since the mouse.

  • source
  • hideshow 134 child comments
  • [–] 99 points 2 years ago (33 children)

    USB C is the best thing to happen to peripherals since the mouse.

    I would agree with you if there were a simple way to tell what the USB-C cable I have in my hand can be used for without knowing beforehand. Otherwise, for example, I don't know whether the USB-C cable will charge my device or not. There should have been a simple way to label them for usage that was baked into the standard. As it is, the concept is terrific, but the execution can be extremely frustrating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Hey that's a fair point. Funny how often good ideas are kneecapped by crap executions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I’m pretty sure the phrase “kneecapped by crap executions” is in the USB working groups’s charter. It’s like one of their core guiding principles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    I agree with USB-C, but there are still a million USB-A devices I need to use, and I can't be bothered to buy adapters for all of them. And a USB hub is annoying.

    Plus, having 1-2 USB-C ports only is never gonna be enough. If they are serious about it, why not have 5?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • load more comments (80 replies)
    [–] 119 points 2 years ago (34 children)

    I dont know why this is controversial. I'm way more happy with 4x USB-C, than 5 unique ports, that will likely never be used on a regular basis, even when they were relevant

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    4 USBC would be cool. Most of these devices only have 2 or 3, minus 1 required for power delivery. If you have peripherals a hub is almost required.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 90 points 2 years ago (41 children)

    As long as a computer has 4 usb-c ports, I think you’re covered for everything.

    Yes we had more different ports back in the days, but most were never used.

    Usb-c is way more practical. Still that implies that you have more than 2 Usb-c ports.

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 83 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (30 children)

    I'm no Apple fanboy (never owned a product of theirs and never will) but to be fair, those two USB-C ports can do everything the old, removed ports can do and more. The real crime here is not putting enough of them on the laptop.

    Edit: The only port I'll lament the removal of is the headphone jack. USB-C headphones are rare, adapters get lost, and bluetooth headphones compress the audio and have input lag. Everything else can go, though, and won't be missed. (Okay fine ethernet can stay too.)

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Apple’s MacBook Pro includes HDMI and a third usb/Thunderbolt port alongside an SDXC and headphone jack (the latter of which is on all their laptops albeit on the other side). This seems like the perfect balance for most users.

    It’s nonsense they don’t include HDMI on the Air, but then “it’s kinda thin and kinda light”.

    I was not sad to see FireWire and mini-DisplayPort replaced with usb-c/thunderbolt.

    Current port line up on “pro” machines:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 72 points 2 years ago

    And there's the soldered RAM and storage, and glued-in or screwed-in battery...

  • source
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Dude, those two little UBS-C ports do 50x what the ports on the bottom laptop could do

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 65 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    To make our laptops look clean and minimalistic, they made us buy a bunch of dongles and adapters.

    Screw it, I'm buying a rugged laptop with the thickness of a desktop PC next

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    Is this rage bait? Those are different macbooks. I think the bottom ones are pros. My current Pro M2 has HDMI and magsafe. My M1 (Air?) is like the top one, but is not in fact a pro and therefore does not provide as many ports.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    I’m glad I can plug in one port and have a dual display setup, all peripherals, speakers, ethernet, charging, etc connected at my desk in one go.

    If I want to leave, unplug one thing and I’m good to go.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 49 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    I'm on the other side wishing peripherals would catch up and all become USB-C already. I'm tired of USB-A.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They remove the extra ports because they take up space in the board.

    That aside if you’re buying Mac you took it from yourself. No one made you buy it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (31 children)

    As someone who daily drives a laptop for work and does field work on server facilities, finding a modern replacement that has both a RJ45 port and square USB (USB-A?) ports available on both sides, has been a pain in the hassle.

    And I'm not even crying over the loss of VGA any longer. That one I can live without.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • load more comments (31 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The annoying thing is they're not even that much thinner. They've just reshaped the edge to make it look like there isn't room for real ports.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    USB-C does a lot of heavy lifting. Also, MagSafe™ is still there. A little surprised there is also a SD card slot. And a HDMI port. Not complaining about their inclusion, and I do use them regularly, but why did the dongle company give these to us?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    That's what happens when designers boss engineers around. Form over function is pure cancer and it's becoming pervasive in our civilization due to the overwhelming ubiquity of propaganda(marketing). I have nothing but contempt for these trends.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (12 children)

    I'm good with it to be honest. One port that can do it all. Not proprietary.

    The longer we keep including legacy ports the longer they'll stick around on peripheral devices

    Manufactures won't change until forced. The transition period might be a bit painful, but worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I miss having a thousand different cables to keep track of /s

    really, all we need is the companies to start packing those laptops with thunderbolt3 or equivalent USB-C (USB 4). I love the old ports, but they were unnecessary. I'd rather the industry finally takes on the open thunderbolt standard and we're all good to go. With 10 thunderbolt ports you have 10 HDMI, or 10 USB, or 10 Ethernet, or 10 headphone jacks, or 10 RJ45 or whatever you need + PCIe tunneling.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    USB-C is awesome though. I carry one charger amd dongle for HDMI and ethernet. It serves my many devices including Steam Deck, phone and laptop.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [+] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    I actually prefer the standardization here. Sick of having 2 boxes of different cords.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›