Is this not potential grounds for a mistrial and a solid appeal?

That dude is getting the entire courthouse thrown at him to prove her allegiance to Fussolini is completely unwavering, again.

Wait, he's being charged with attempted assassination? Did he actually aim a gun at trump? Or was he just exercising his 2nd amendment rights?

The Dishonorable Aileen Qanon

Cannon: Bias? That's absurd. That's an absurd reason to get in the way of my Supreme Court appointment.

Someone PLEASE, get a camera and take another picture of this woman to use.

This is a bit of a non-story.

Department of Justice already decided not to reassign the case.

Backed into a corner, the Justice Department finally took a stance on Cannon’s partiality on Oct. 21—at least in the context of the Routh prosecution. In a perfunctory, one-and-a-half-page filing, the government opposed Routh’s motion, stating that it did “not present either facts or case law requiring recusal on this record in light of the controlling standard.”

Given that the Justice Department has already ruled on this, there was no way that Cannon was going to say "You might be right, I can't be impartial." Has she done that it would have also guaranteed her removal from the documents case when it is eventually reopened. Though I suspect she'll be removed from that anyway.

cant really expect her to since her hero and benefactor was in danger /s.

Right, because this is the case that would make her care about presenting as impartial.

Not exactly on topic, but she looks like she could be a linebacker on a pro nfl team. That neck and jaw, both thick as fuck. I'm assuming the project 2025 team wrote that statement like pretty much everything that comes out of her stupid fucking mouth.