this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13496 readers
955 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

why the fuck is this shit here, this isn't facebook god damnit

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this loss somehow?

The top expression equals one, and the bottom expression equals 9. What am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a math joke ("""joke""") about misunderstanding the intent behind written problems, as poorly-written problems can be interpreted in multiple ways, but well-written problems are (almost) always correctly interpreted by reasonably math literate folks. The fact the you arrived at two different solutions means that you correctly interpreted the intent behind both problems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh I get it. It's 6 / 2(1 + 2) disambiguated

The answer is 1 btw

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm not trying to start an argument over this, but I respectfully disagree.

6 / 2 * (1 + 2)

6 / 2 * 3

3 * 3

9 edit: accidentally said 6 here

Parentheses first, then division and multiplication granting priority to operations on the left.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If it's 2(1 + 2) that's considered one "term" and heavily implies that you should FOIL first before anything else. It isn't the same as 2 * (2 + 1). Of course you wouldn't likely get an equation like that without knowing "what" you're doing, which would answer any ambiguity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Assuming the first way is written correctly, the equation is actually 6 / (2 * (1 + 2)). The (1 + 2) is still inside the denominator. So it is solved as follows:

6 / (2 * (1 + 2))

6 / (2 * 3)

6 / 6

1

The second equation incorrectly takes out the (1 + 2) and places it as the numerator on the side. In order to take that piece out correctly, it would have to be: (6 / 2) * (1 / (1 + 2))

And to solve it, it would look like as follows:

(6 / 2) * (1 / (1 + 2))

3 * (1 / (1 + 2))

3 * (1 / 3)

3 / 3

1

Also, 3 * 3 = 9 in regards to second incorrect equation (incorrect meaning the second incorrectly refactored equation from the pic that you answered correctly up until the last operation).

I think The_sleepy_woke_dialectic forgot to put parentheses around the denominator, but I believe it was meant to be interpreted as the entire denominator as shown in the pic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

My bad on typing 6 as the final number, typo.

I think the image is discussing the two ways most people interpret the (deliberately slightly obtuse) equation 6 / 2(1+2) Following BEDMAS BOMDAS PEMDAS or however you call it in your area as written, the correct interpretation is interpretation #2, which resolves to 9,

However many people also interpret the implitic multiplication in 2(1+2) to have higher priority, or makes the 2 and () into one unit, as if put into Parentheses, which leads to interpretation #1, which resolves to 1.

The real answer is to make the original question less obtuse, but any parsing algorithm correctly given the rules of mathematical notation would resolve it to 9

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I just realized where the confusion is coming from:

A fraction written in the formation as shown in the image has implicit parentheses over the numerator and the denominator (as well as the entire fraction) that need to be explicitly written when converted to single-line form.

The rest of my response is just for extra clarificationIf we assume the second equation is true, then the first would have to be represented as (6 * (1 + 2)) / 2, which is (6 * 3) / 2, which is 18 / 2, which is 9. This means the mistake was made by multiplying the fraction with (1 + 2) by incorrectly placing it in the denominator instead of the numerator. I think the image is supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek troll as the two equations are non-preserving transformations of each other. It's a common mistake that is made in arithmetic.

Here are the equations in WolframAlpha:

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i2d=true&i=Divide%5B6%2C2%5C%2840%291%2B2%5C%2841%29%5D

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i2d=true&i=Divide%5B6%2C2%5D%5C%2840%291%2B2%5C%2841%29

Unfortunately the step by step solutions are now locked behind a subscription.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

The person who wrote this did this to purposefully confuse people and no one should even touch this. The way it's written is wrong

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I can't tell if that's a fucked up 7 or a fucked up 1

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

As someone with bad handwriting, I can say it is a 1.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It's fucked up

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

It's a fucked up 1

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

It's a fucked up 7

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

All my homies call it 1.5 sorry

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago