this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
117 points (96.8% liked)

Games

16580 readers
1459 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Never knew it did support it. I've always used mods like vivecraft to do it

[–] [email protected] 28 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"drop" is an autoantonym.

Will VR be introduced as a new feature next year, or is it already a feature that will be abandoned next year?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

there has been a vr version that is aparently no longer supported

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Would be fucked if they delete the working version to ensure "purity" and parity in the state of supported versions, and not just leave it be, not update it and let people keep their shit.

Edit: Aaaaaaaand it looks like that's the case. ~~Live and let live.~~ Cull the weak.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

There's no real VR version of Minecraft for them to leave be or for people to lose access to. VR is just a feature built into the Bedrock Edition that's activated by launching the game through a headset.

Unless you count the Samsung Gear VR version. That one's been left alone ever since the Gear VR fell into obsolescence and can still be played in its unsupported state on an unsupported headset.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There's no real VR version of Minecraft for them to leave be or for people to lose access to. VR is just a feature built into the Bedrock Edition that's activated by launching the game through a headset.

Since Better Together, that is the VR version, just like Bedrock on iOS is the iOS version.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

No it's not like that. Unlike Minecraft Bedrock on PC, XBOX, PS, Switch, iOS, or Android, there's no VR specific Minecraft version that can be installed. If you have Minecraft on PS4 or PC, VR support is already built in.

For example, Skyrim and Skyrim VR are separate games, but Minecraft isn't. They can't just leave the VR version alone because there is no VR-only version and the only thing that determines whether you're playing in 2D or VR is a flag that's set on launch.

Edit: Again, discounting the Gear VR version here because they dropped support for it long before Better Together happened and it can only be played on the Gear VR which was basically Google Cardboard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see how that's a difference. They all use the same codebase, so either none of these platform editions exist or all of them exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're the same codebase, but they all need to be bought separately from each other. Like, there will probably come a day when Minecraft Bedrock on Nintendo Switch stops receiving updates, but the PS5 version continues on.

For there to be a VR version for them to just stop updating like that, a VR-specific version would need to exist in the first place. They can't just abandon VR as-is but still have it available to be played like they did with Minecraft on the 3DS because there isn't a VR version they can abandon.

They abandoned the Gear VR verison, but that was a separate installation from regular Minecraft Bedrock and they could just stop updating that version of the app.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Abandoning maintenance of the feature is pretty much just dropping the version. This just feels like needlessly pedantic talk to me. What matters is that this medium of play is now unsupported.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

They can't really just leave a feature to start breaking as updates go on, especially not one that can cause as many problems as VR can.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd be sad if it wasn't for the fact that 3rd party methods of playing MC in VR are actually better than the official method. Though this does suck for those with PSVR and not PCVR (though, can't it do that now?)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Honestly, Im really suprised official support lasted this long. Microsoft largely gave up on VR years ago.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Software "support" is such a fucked up thing these days.

Dropping support no longer means "You're on your own now, bye!"

Dropping support now means "Yoink! That's ours. Bye!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, the idiots running software that has been unsupported for years with gaping security holes that enabled botnets to attack everyone else are to blame for that one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No, the issue isn't irresponsible devs.

The only issue here is companies who treat my device as theirs, and make decisions about what needs to be removed from my PC. And of course the voters (like your safety-OCD ass) that tolerate this bullshit being a legal option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Literal victim blaming.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

that hype train was fun though. The standard microsoft loop.

  • They build a crappy version
  • Put no actual investment in it
  • Drop the idea
  • Someone else comes along, makes a version that's great, and microsoft gets jealous
  • Microsoft throws 1000% of their resources behind the technology which they are now behind in
  • They cram the product down everyone's throats, not realizing how much they're annoying their base
  • Realizing defeat, they quietly kill off the product and act like it never happened.

Windows Tiles, Windows Phone, Zune, Tablets, AI, take your pick

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

I wish Windows Phone had stayed. More competition in the mobile space is good, and they had some functioning ideas. Eventually they gave up and turned into a pale Apple imitator before giving up.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

NGL x86-64 tablets are legitimately much more useful than their competition.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Surface tablets are niche but SO much more useful than the app-restricted alternatives from samsung or apple. Nuke windows and stick your fav distro with a tablet frontend on there and it becomes an incredibly versatile little machine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve never been into tablets, are Surfaces as easy to install Linux on as a PC? Is there any bootloader unlocking or anything like on a phone, or is it more like secure boot on a PC?

I had installed Linux on an old Chromebook and it would always offer to wipe the hard drive on every boot, so now I’ve assumed that some hardware isn’t as Linux friendly as others. I think a lot has changed since I got my desktop and the last laptop that I installed Linux on.

And are the Linux touch screen interfaces any good? I tried a Fairphone that was running something Linux and the touch interface was lacking. (It was a great tiny laptop for using a terminal though).

And last random thought… I loved the 10” netbook form factor back in 2009 or so. I think tablets are a similar size, but the weight is in the “monitor” part, I preferred the bottom heavy laptop form factor. Are the Surfaces okay for that, or top heavy enough that they can fall over and can’t have the angle adjusted finely like a laptop?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

I terms of installation they are actually a PC. Just load your favorite distro on a USB stick and install it as you would on a Desktop. For me Ubuntu is working great on an older Surface Go, including touch. The keyboard cover is highly recommended of course.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Surface are basically a tablet (=all hardware and weight in the monitor). You can get them with a cover that contains a keyboard but it is still top heavy (think of a normal cover for a tablet, but slightly more sturdy because of the keyboard).

There's also a surface book that more or lees is like a laptop - from the looks of it. The bottom part with the keyboard is heavier, but only contains the keyboard, an USB hub and additional batteries. It's till top heavy with it, as you can "detach the screen" and still have a fully functional "PC tablet".

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

"More useful than the app restricted..."

"Stick your fav distro on there"

Eeeeeh...... So one is bad because you can't install everything that's available on Windows but on the other you should install an OS that doesn't work with everything available on Windows either? Mickey Mouse logic right there!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"Not app restricted" does not mean "Windows software". These devices are completely open. You can install whatever you want. That includes the OS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

By nuking Windows you're trading restrictions for other restrictions is my point, the suggestion of installing Linux doesn't make sense if the point of not getting an Android tablet is to not be limited as Windows is the OS that's compatible with the most programs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, Windows is more open than iOS. But you still have much more freedom with how it works with Linux.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Surface tablets are niche but SO much more useful than the app-restricted alternatives from samsung or apple. Nuke windows and stick your fav distro with a tablet frontend on there and it becomes an incredibly versatile little machine.

Reading comprehension, work on it.

The point from the get go was that Android tablets are too app restricted. Not about freedom to do what you want with the OS.

APP

RESTRICTION

And on that front, Linux doesn't beat windows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Neat, you've never heard of dual booting! I don't do it much because the tools that are relevant to my life are all natively on linux, but: On devices like your PC or surface (and technically some android devices, but it's pretty janky right now) you can have multiple operating systems installed. If you're doing network management, a device that can boot into both windows and linux is a real boon, for example because there's plenty of low-level tools that haven't been ported over to windows / are much easier to use from a dedicated CLI vs. something like powershell (or god forbid, WSL...). Surfaces are great for that, because their small form factor and one hand interface (touch input) mean you can get into some truly stupid places and have your tools right there with you. It's like a netbook, but not as woefully underpowered.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, by "Nuke Windows", clearly what you meant was "Dual boot"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Nnno, I meant "I do not need windows so you can just axe it no problem". You expressed your reluctance to give up the ability to use windows applications, which is an issue that can be trivially resolved on a device like a surface where you can easily implement dual booting. It's... you know, really easy to keep that functionality.

But I guess if you really want to be a jerk about misunderstanding me, go ahead? There's nothing really stopping you, just do yourself a favor and look at the topic you're being a jerk about. Incredibly niche applications for consumer hardware. Seriously, you're better than this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just use the language that conveys your intention and people won't argue with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

... That's what I did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

I got a second hand surface go 2 recently and it's the perfect companion device. I wish marvel unlimited and the like had apps on windows but that doesn't do me from using a different comic app and building up my own library anyway, probably for the better long term.

I just found out about mouse without borders yesterday and now my surface go 2 is like a portable monitor for my dev laptop when it's not docked in my study. But because it's still technically it's own thing and not just an extended desktop, I can have documentation on it and scroll with the touchscreen when needed without messing up the mouse on the laptop screen, but if i need to properly interact with the tablet I can just use the mouse and keyboard on my laptop too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

Didnt even know it has support. But I also dont have VR so I never bothered looking it up.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Well that's a shame

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Vivecraft is on Modrinth as well

https://modrinth.com/mod/vivecraft

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m in the middle of moving so all my VR stuff is packed in storage. Sadly, I may never get to try it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Java VR is way nicer than what Microsoft had. Their MS implementation always left me nauseous and I’d never had a problem with that in VR before

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure Java still has VR mods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s cool to know, but is there also a mod to use a controller? That’s what keeps me in bedrock (currently playing android bedrock version on Linux).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/controllable

The answer to “is there a mod for adding X to Minecraft Java” is almost always “yes”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nice, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, there are. I think one is called something like Controllable or Controllerable or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

That is either the bane or something really close. It's really damn good too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I find this hilarious because you can currently buy a Minecraft themed charging brick and/or cord and get a code for a cosmetic VR headset for bedrock edition inside the packaging. 🙃

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Hope they won't drop support for RTX; it hasn't been updated since release...