this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
262 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

Imagine Magoos if Jack Dorsey was campaigning for Obama or Biden back when he owned Twitter... They would be absolutely losing their shit. Fox news would be running stories 24/7 about it and biased media influence...

They piss me off to no end. Hypocrite, thy name is MAGA.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

"The last thing I would do is trust a computer program," says the owner of a car company developing self driving & rocket company building automation into rocket launches.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 minutes ago

Well, actually that's correct, which is why there are various approaches to make it possible to trust an output of a computer program, verify it against that of other such computer programs, and so on.

But in my opinion the whole idea of voting sucks. It's less democratic than sortition. With sortition minority positions are disadvantaged, but with most systems involving vote they are absolutely trumped (pun intended, though saying "harrised" would not be as far as I'd like).

Republics which used sortition have historically existed for very long spans of time. In Antiquity, in Middle Ages, during Renaissance. It's harder to cheat with. Which also means it's harder to sow distrust in.

And, well, humans are superstitious creatures and results of sortition are much more similar to how they see divine will.

Sortition is also more honest, it doesn't abuse the human instinct of allowing politicians more than their rightful mandate when elected by a majority vote. When the reason a person holds some position is because a of a lucky die, the society looks at them more critically and they themselves know they won't enter that river for a second time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

not to mention brain chips. Remember, every accusation is a confession with the MAGA crowd. I bet we'd find a few gems in the code for tesla and twitter now

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

Software that killed a pedestrian recently.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 hours ago

Sounds like dominion should sue musk too

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 hours ago

“The last thing I would do is trust a computer program”

What a weird thing to say from someone that sells a car he says will eventually drive itself.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Friendly reminder that an Immigrant African American Welfare Queen, with numerous baby mommas and children he don’t even talk to, is a foreign actor attempting to sway American Elections by spreading fake news. Truly the enemy within that needs to be addressed, there is a reason he travels with as many as 20 bodyguards just to touch grass Source.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 hours ago
  • Children that won't talk to him.
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

“The probability that a homicidal maniac will try to kill you is proportionate to how many homicidal maniacs hear your name,” he said. “So they hear my name a lot — I’m like, ‘OK, I’m on the list,’ you know.”

this makes it sound like high profile assassinations are caused by a bunch of “maniacs” pulling names out of hats

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

He watched the documentaries about The Jerk and The Terminator.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the first attempt on Trump's life, and I hate to admit it, but he's not that far off. I can't tell you how large of a quantity it is, but trump sure riled up a bunch of mentally ill people who may or may not have a good grasp of their mental stability.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If the assassins weren't deranged, they would choose their targets better. If you want to effect political change through assassination, you don't target the puppet. You target the person controlling the puppet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 56 minutes ago

You're describing professional hits like governments do. Our shootings in this country are 99.9% by crazy lone gunmen.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't Dominion already win at least one defamation lawsuit because some jackass was spewing these lies? Gonna love seeing Elmo have to pay up, just a shame it won't cost him enough to make him shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fox News settled for $787 million.

I would love to see Musk go down like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 28 minutes ago

He could, sadly, do that a few dozen times and still be ok.

We need to eat the rich.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Cost Tucker Carlson his job.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

that's ok, he works for putin now

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know, if they manage to get a judgment against him for a couple billion dollars, that's like 10% of his worth after he tanked Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 46 minutes ago

Yeah but at that value its still going to hurt.

Especially if he keeps doing it.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 6 hours ago

Ohh please let this be actionable a la Fox News

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Bankrupt his ass

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It's like nobody is even trying to kill him.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It should be fully legal to kill billionaires

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

At some point of extreme wealth, you get declared a dragon and it should be perfectly fine to organize adventuring parties to attempt to slay you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Okay but if I fond a magic ring that turns me invisible im fucking keeping it, its mines mines precious!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

Ah . . maybe I'd better hold onto that . . .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I saw a comment a while ago where someone calculated the equivalent wealth of fictional dragons (e.g. by estimating the dimensions of Smaug's vast gold trove in The Hobbit) and determined that real billionaires are far worse hoarders of money. Like 1000x worse.

I should try to find that comment again.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Sue him for 99.5% of his net worth that should shut this cunt up

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

101%

He'll just pull himself up by the boot straps and billionaire work ethic

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they want all his debt?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

They wouldn't get the debt. He'd keep that.

However, I don't know why he should left with any assets to balance the debt. Organizations that loaned him money or products should suffer too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

My man loves a lawsuit. Can't climax without one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Be me

A moth, chilling with my moth friends

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 hours ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/17/musk-pushes-debunked-dominion-voting-conspiracy-theory-at-first-pennsylvania-appearance.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support