top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 2 years ago (24 children)

I love steam, but let's get real here for a second. Valve will change some day. Enshitification is inevitable.

GabeN will not live forever. The vultures circle endlessly, and one day they will win. There is no good ending here (for now).

Consider building a tower, downloading everything youve purchased on steam, and keep it offline. Maybe have a 2nd set of hard drives as a backup. Put these priceless artifacts in your will.

Plan accordingly and enjoy the ride while it lasts.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    I love steam, but let's get real here for a second. Valve will change some day. Enshitification is inevitable.

    Steam is an example where I'm not sure when it would happen.

    It already comes with a hefty fee of 30% per sale on the platform. I don't think they can raise that without serious backlash. And there also isn't really a need, Steam prints money. It prints money because it's where users are. Users are there because they like the features. Some good features are only there because of laws (e.g. refunding); Valve can't remove these.

    So how would you make the service even more profitable?

    Enshittification happens because corporations want (more) money out of a service that built a userbase. These were often running at a loss. To turn a profit, they need to change.

    Steam can sell you licenses to games you don't own already. It's up to each publisher. Valve doesn't care, they just deliver.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They could add a fee to re-download games, a subscription requirement to use friend invites, start throwing spam notifications on your screen/in your email inbox about “sponsored content”, upload your browser history for better ad targeting, etc. the list gets pretty long pretty quickly. Just look at what the Epic store does right now (hint, it’s almost all of those things already).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Think of it more like Netflix. Netflix was great, then the market fractured and Netflix enshitified in response.

    What it would take here is for a publisher to become a real distributor in the space, but competition is weak right now. Just like it really took Disney wading in to disrupt Netflix, it would take someone equally large, like Microsoft, to disrupt Steam. Sorry Ubisoft, but you don't cut it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I don't play many AAA games but I'm forever gutted that the fight to make them able to be pirated is a losing battle. I want to pay for my indie games but on occasion I look online at the crack status of AAA games from oecen 2-3 years ago and they're still not playable.

    It creates a weird dichotomy where people who pirate or at least don't buy expensive games don't take part in the mainstream gaming conversation at all, which is totally different from the rest of pirated media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They will never go public so enshittification rules don't necessarily apply

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Never say never, but I don't think it's going to happen while Gabe is in charge

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I doubt gabe would choose a successor that would make steam public either, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Maybe, maybe not. As equity holders get older they may be looking to cash out so they can fuel their retirements.

    I don't think that's something Gabe is interested in, but we're talking about what will happen when he dies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Sure, but hopefully that's a very long time away, and there's always piracy. Hopefully Gabe lasts for another 20 years or longer. Hopefully he has a high-quality person as a successor.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 52 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    steam survey says 1.92% is on linux. So there's about 736,651 linux users on steam?! neat

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Wild that the video game industry is so big, and this still isn't even 1% of people on earth.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    huh, what dropped in 2020 that caused that big spike?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I remember when 9 million was a lot.

    I remember when 1 million was a lot.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    It's still crazy to me that this is the same program I used to browse CS zombie mod servers. There was no real store to speak of then.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    All of them playing that KFC dating Sim

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Still wild to me how competition shoots themselves in the foot. It's even worse than streaming services.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I honestly thought the number of concurrent users was a lot higher a lot longer ago, but either way, it's come a long way since ~2003?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    38 million only? I thought there were way more gamers out there. Isn't it a market bigger than TV and cinema combined? (maybe even sports included?)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›