this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
141 points (83.4% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2378 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Zuckerberg said senior Biden administration officials "repeatedly pressured" Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to "censor" content in 2021. "I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken," he wrote to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). "Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction -- and we're ready to push back if something like this happens again," Zuckerberg added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 206 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Asking them to take down stuff that is clearly false and can endanger people is not censorship.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago (2 children)

not to mention, basically, he's handing the platform to a very vocal minority.

A minority that probably hates his guts. because lets face it, everybody hates Zuck the Cuck

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A minority that probably hates his guts.

How is this relevant to us? The subject here is about the platform's influence on society, not of Zuckerberg.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The platform is accommodating people- or trying to, anyhow- that would likely turn on him in a heart beat.

It’s patently stupid to alienate the vast majority of people, who look at antivax as rampant stupidity, to accommodate people who will inevitably prove to be too extreme.

Look at what’s happening on twitter, with advertisers leaving.

That’s about to be Facebook.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Unless they can infiltrate his underground bunker in Hawaii, I doubt he cares how much they hate him.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

You can also not claim freedom of speech when yelling fire in a crowded Theatre. I don't understand why this is different. In this case the platform is amplifying people yelling fire and even creates spaces for people yelling fire to gather and talk strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 142 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Zuckerberg thinks Facebook should self regulate and that means in this case be free to allow posts of anti-vax propaganda and covid conspiracy theories that literally cost lives.

This is just a great example of why social media needs external regulation.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is just a great example of why social media needs external regulation.

And "needs external regulation" here just means "needs to not be above the law".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They are not above the law, because these is no law in the US that regulates how social media platforms should be moderated. This is new territory. The EU only recently passed the Digital Services Act that broadly deals with this topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone's trying to become a right wing grifter.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago

He hired Joel Kaplan over ten years ago.

Kaplan was a Bush toadie who participated in the Brooks Brothers Riot that stopped the recount in Florida in 2000 letting the corrupt jackasses on the Supreme Court to steal the election for Bush.

Kaplan has personally exempted right wing "news" sources from Facebook's truthfulness standards.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Meta really needs to be split up, along with Google and Microsoft. Nobody can be allowed to have this much influence on public opinion without it going terribly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People need to stop using Meta's products. They can't survive without users.

Facebook, Instagram, Threads, etc. are all Meta.

Worst case scenario I see brewing is that Google gets split up and Meta and Microsoft just buy up their assets.

With Android near the top of the divestment list, that's a scary notion.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

That's just not going to happen. Unfortunately the average consumer doesn't much care about any of these things. It's the job of governments to prevent excessive concentration in industry. They've been doing a piss poor job in recent decades.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Facebook has enough money and influence to just buy the next big social media. Hell, most people don't even seem aware Instagram is owned by them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Everything is owned by like 10 companies. They all need to be busted up.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, the "express regret" module was installed yesterday. It's nice to see his upgrades are coming along.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember on TNG when Data got his emotion chip? This could get hairy…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which time? When he joined up with his evil brother or when he crashed the Enterprise into a planet?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

we should not compromise our content standards

You have to have standards to be able to compromise them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Like he said: no compromise!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago

Said the company who deleted a facebook post by Malaysia Prime Minister offering condolences to Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, which Meta later apologised and restored the post. But sure, lets go ahead and defend misinformation that basically hindering the vaccination effort.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Meta CEO also said the company “shouldn’t have demoted” a New York Post story about corruption allegations involving President Biden’s family ahead of the 2020 election while waiting for fact-checkers to review it.

The social media company has since updated its policies and processes, including no longer demoting content in the U.S. while waiting for fact-checkers, he noted.

This seems to be the only concrete thing in here and it seems like a terrible idea to me. No information about what exactly the pressure was from the government or what specific content they took issue with, leaving us all to come up with the guesses that most comfortably confirm our own biases.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Considering Zuck and Meta’s track record so far, I am categorically unwilling to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Content? Hardly.

Disinformation. Lies. Etc.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago

The further we go down the misinformation hole the more these guys do their best to make their platforms shitty in the US while they comply with every dictator's political oppression policies outside the US.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only reason this shitbag's site is still relevant is because it is a boomer propaganda machine

He knows he's complicit in the collapse, and just wants to make enough money to survive the world wide riots that will result. Every decision he makes is to guarantee that goal.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

You are exactly correct.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He seems confident (R) will win the next election. Either presidency or enough of congress.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

He's also trying to help make that happen

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction – and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again

Well, I did need a good laugh this morning, I just didn't expect it to come from the lies this fucker tells himself so he can ~~recharge~~ sleep at night..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Zuckerberg is dangerously stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

He's dangerously sociopathic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Shit I didn’t know Zuck was going the Elon Route.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

'They told me to keep it secret, but I regret not talking more about it.' Some things are black or white, don't try to fool us with the 'grey area'. If you didn't outspeak is because your whole purpose was to specifically avoid doing so!

load more comments
view more: next ›