“We’re aware of reports that access to Signal has been blocked in some countries,” Signal says. If you are affected by the blocks, the company recommends turning on its censorship circumvention feature. (NetBlocks reports that this feature lets Signal “remain usable” in Russia.)

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I take that as a compelling recommendation for Signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 98 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Legitimate countries don't need to ban communications platforms.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    He said "communications platforms" not "misinformation, social engineering, and mass data collection platform masquerading as a social media platform"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I kinda disagree - that's not to say that they don't usually do so for illegitimate reasons (or that these bans are legitimate), but there's plenty of valid reasons why a government would want/need to ban a platform

    X, for example, has been giving the UK a whole lot of good reasons why they may wish to consider it (restoring the accounts of people like Tommy Robinson, allowing misinformation, the owner of the platform himself actively spreading that misinformation)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We should allow the US surveillance giants into all countries, and let US companies control all world social media and communications platforms. Signal too, since it's a US-hosted centralized service that must follow its NSL laws /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I find these absolutist arguments particularly hilarious in face of UK now actively talking about restricting social media, and arresting people for posts. When people use media to incite violence and social unrest in countries the west considers to be adversaries, free speech stands above all other considerations. However, as soon as these things start happening in the west, then the restrictions on speech are immediately put into place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Worth highlighting that Telegram in Russia and WhatsApp in Venezuela - both with vastly larger user bases than Signal - are not blocked...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just turn on the censorship intervention feature

    based

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's a glowing recommendation of Signal. And a good reminder to donate. I'm doing it right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    Thankfully there are Signal proxies, VPNs and Tor (which can be used on mobile devices through Orbot.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    This means it's working.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Client/Server apps will do that in hostile countries, that's why people are moving to decentralized messaging platforms such as Matrix

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Matrix has the unfortunate problem right now where all the big clients have matrix.org set as the default homeserver. Yes, it is a decentralized and federated protocol, but I wonder how many users are registered on matrix.org vs other servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Matrix lacks metadata encryption

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    And before lacked this and that. It keeps improving, contrast to Signal having the server code closed source for more than a year so the Signal devs could get a headstart and insider knowledge in their Signal-included crytpo coin grief.

    How one can trust Signal after them showcasing what they truly stand for is mind blowing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Whats mind blowing is the BS people like you come up with to shit on a non profit open source project.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Signal falls right into the perfect niche of usability and privacy, but the problem is that not many people want that. The privacy nuts don't think it is private enough or transparent enough and the people that want something usable just use stuff with more features like Discord, Facebook Messenger, etc.

    I've gotten my wife to use it because we felt more safe about sharing lewd photos there than other mediums. We got our partner to use it because they're on iPhone and we're on Android and SMS/MMS sucks ass. One of my friends said he has it and would be fine using it if everyone else in the group chat wanted to. But that's it. Everybody else in my circle wants to use Facebook Messenger.

    Weirdly, I think Signal needs to focus more on fin features than safety features for a while. It's an easier sell for friends to hop over when it has the same cool stuff as the other platforms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Signal having the server code closed source for more than a year so the Signal devs could get a headstart and insider knowledge

    That argument makes absolutely no sense. This server-side code does almost nothing. The only task it really has is passing around encrypted packets between clients. All of the encryption is client-side, of course including metadata encryption. That's how end-to-end encryption works. The server code really doesn't matter. The Signal protocol, which is used for client-side, local, on-device end-to-end encryption has always been fully open, and it can be used by any app/platform.

    How one can trust Signal after them showcasing what they truly stand for is mind blowing

    It's very simple. The client is open source, and the encryption happens locally within the client application. You don't need to trust anything or anyone except for the code and mathematics, which are fully open, so you can verify them yourself.

    It's mind-boggling how people attempt to spread so much misinformation while having absolutely no understanding of the topic their talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You can just as easily identify servers of a decentralized platform and block them. The disadvantage of a central service would come into play if say the US were to intervene, though Signal has already said they would move abroad if that was the case. For network level blockage it makes no difference if the service is central or not

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It makes a difference in that you have to play perpetual whack-a-mole not only with VPN's but with hosting servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Glad it at least seems easy to circumvent with a VPN

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Time to run some proxies for these oppressed people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I wonder why these 2 countries specifically.

    Some time ago it was reported that Russian Wagner groups have been spotted in Venezuela.

    Now these 2 countries have banned Signal.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›