This is just getting hilarious now.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
352 points (98.9% liked)
politics
18852 readers
4489 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I literally woke my partner up laughing. So he donated to Kamala and appointed Walz to a position. They have both been endorsed by him. This is so delicious
Trump on Walz: “…He's very heavy into transgender. Anything transgender he thinks is great ... I think it's very insulting to Jewish people.”
Did he actually say that? My God, the man's brains have been replaced with rancid oatmeal, and he never noticed the difference.
I think he's trying to hit key words, but can't do it gracefully. He's been told that the terms transgender, Jewish, and whatever else, riles up his base, do he squeezes as many of those words as he can in to every single sound bite. By the time you've processed what the fuck he said he's already moved on to the next idiotic sound bite.
He eulogized a fictional cannibal serial killer and said he was a great guy. The bigotry and antisemitism is just latent in his brain and will come out more and more as his dementia removes whatever filters were left in his speech center.
brain worms. RFKs jumped ship
RFK's died in his brain. His thoughts were so toxic that it killed the worm.
Were they that toxic, or did it just die of starvation?
I'm assuming it was pickled.
Yes.
he never noticed the difference.
Neither did his oatmeal-brained followers
He'LL uNLEaSh HeLL oN eArTh!!- Syphilis Riddled Big Brain who forgot he appointed him to a position.
As president, Trump appointed Walz to serve on the Council of Governors in 2019. The bipartisan advisory council consists of five Democratic and five Republican governors and helps build federal-state partnerships in matters of homeland security and civil support missions.
interests of governors across the nation are accurately represented on the council
Is this just bad wording? Shouldn’t it be the interests of the people whom the governors represent?
No, it is accurate. The committee was about the interests of the governors in the context of differences between states, and while the governor's interests should align with the people they represent, they don't always line up.
In my state it doesn't like up at all. "I see there's a lot of hunters and fishermen in this state. How about we sell more land to giant corporations and poison the waterways with farm runoff?" And half of them are like "anything to own the libs! Hyuck hyuck!"
🤣
view more: next ›