Is this sort of thing normally on Zoom? Feels like an inefficient platform for one-to-many streaming.
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
379 points (95.7% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1812 readers
302 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Maybe they didn't expect so many people to join?
Perhaps they'll switch to a more suited platform for broadcasting to a large audience, like YT or Twitch.
I don't know. I wouldn't have heard about this story if it wasn't for them crashing Zoom.
Statistically speaking it's impossible there weren't some cocks
Statistically speaking you're an asshole.
Being charitable, I am assuming you are implying that someome would turn on their camera to show that?
Zoom webinars like this one are not the same as a your average zoom call. You can see the hosts, ask Q&A question, and talk in chat, but you don't see the other viewers of the call
It would be technically difficult to have calls this big and still support having every single person in the call being able to show cameras/unmute any time. Even if only 1% were unmuted, I doubt zoom's servers could support mixing the audio from thousands of sources in real time and then sending it to hundreds of thousands
I almost want you to explain what the hell that's even supposed to mean. Almost.
Think Zoom crashing in 2020.
~~I’ll never understand why some people really love obsessing over trans folks genetalia.~~
e: just read your reply further down, whoops! i live in a real conservative area and hear so many shitty “jokes” about trans people, deffo jumped the gun a bit on this one lol
Pantsuit nation is back and is as cringe as ever.
👆When your candidate isn’t an actual convicted criminal, rapist, liar and racist so you have to mock things that have no bearing on leadership like clothing, laugh and gender
Remember the histrionics that time Obama wore a tan suit? It doesn't have to make sense.
And mustard! Don't forget the mustard!
I see you prefer white hoods.
Pretty sure white hoods were replaced with flack jackets recently on the racist bingo card.
So steal women's rights to their own bodies and then surprise Pikachu when women rally behind a candidate to reverse the damage to women's rights that the other candidate caused.
Call them whatever cringe name you want but this is the EXACT reason why it is happening. Failing to recognize that HALF the population is women and you can't expect nothing to happen when you steal major rights from them.
Isn't what men wear technically a pant suit?
Pantsuit Nation was a Facebook and twitter organization of Hillary Clinton supporters who were terminally online and posted enormous amounts of cringe that was beyond smug until November 8 2016, and thereafter incredibly bitter but still incredibly cringe.
https://www.amazon.com/Pantsuit-Nation-Libby-Chamberlain/dp/1250153328/
I mean, I agree Hillary is cringe af, but... we're talking about a completely different lady. The fact you think it's OK to generalize on that level is still blatantly moronic sexism or racism, and the fact you think that's acceptable logic demonstrates how fucking stupid you truly are. Do better. For your own sake.