212

Critics of a new Louisiana law, which makes it a crime to approach within 25 feet (7.6 meters) of a police officer under certain circumstances, fear that the measure could hinder the public’s ability to film officers — a tool that has increasingly been used to hold police accountable.

Under the law, anyone who is convicted of “knowingly or intentionally” approaching an officer, who is “lawfully engaged in the execution of his official duties,” and after being ordered to “stop approaching or retreat” faces up to a $500 fine, up to 60 days in jail or both. The law was signed by Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, Tuesday and goes into effect Aug. 1.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 76 points 2 years ago

This some fascist shit. Why is the government so obsessed with shielding cops from accountability?

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 years ago

Police Unions and lobbyists. Police Unions are one of the few times unions aren't necessarily a good thing.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

All public sector unions are wrong.

[-] nyar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Because Republicans are fascists and Democrats are spineless.

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Democrats aren’t spineless. they are operating in a world where republicans own the majority of the media and will repeat whatever they say. For example, The democrats lost a lot of local elections last cycle because republican media scared everyone into thinking crime rates were soaring even though they’re at all time lows. Republicans have gerrymandered so well that they have to be extremely careful or risk losing even in states where they have the majority of voters.

Republicans have been playing a long game starting with Regan and they are in their end game now.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago

LoL there's no way the police ain't gonna abuse this law.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

They will start charging at people shouting for them to move back then just grab them and beat the tar out of them.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 24 points 2 years ago

How close do you need to be to take cell phone video of police without being a distraction?

25 feet feels a bit much, but understandable. I can certainly record people 25 feet away with very good detail.

However, does that radius expand if a second cop gets in between and starts walking your way? That sounds like an entrapment issue.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 16 points 2 years ago

Like they're gonna care how far you really were.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I didn't approach, he ran at me!

[-] wolfeh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

"It's comin' right for us!"

[-] PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

It's far enough that recording clear video in darker settings would be harder since most zoom lenses suck in low light. Audio would be harder to pickup as well.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

However, does that radius expand if a second cop gets in between and starts walking your way? That sounds like an entrapment issue.

If the wording in this article is correct, the radius would stay the same. It talks about approaching officers, not being approached by officers. If they close the gap, that's on them.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

25 feet is far enough to prevent most voices that aren't yelling from being recorded. Any sidewalk next to an officer pulling a car over is restricted, as well as 2 lanes of road. A bailiff restricts most the courtroom. Jails are essentially fucked for incarcerated. Any cop directing traffic could choose any car to fuck over. Be careful at any sporting event where a drunk may get removed.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The point of the Arizona law is to prevent you from recording your own encounter with an officer. You can’t ask an officer to stand 25 feet away from your car after being pulled over.

This needs to be challenged with the “one-party consent” law that allows for both parties of a phone conversation to record if one is recording. If I’m being recorded, I should maintain the right to record.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Interesting take. I didn't read it that way. If you are the epicenter, you would always be withing the 25' circle. Hmmm

Edit: based on the article, it doesn't sound like this would apply. The law mentions approaching an officer, implying the bystander began away from but on a vector moving towards the location.

But I'm no lawyer.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago

Yet another reason to avoid the deep south.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Wait until they learn about zoom lenses.

[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Zoom lenses are great, unfortunately most phones only have wide angle lenses.

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Walk away from police? Jail.

Walk towards police? Believe or not, also jail!

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

How close can they get to ligma?

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
212 points (98.6% liked)

News

37251 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS