this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
544 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republican Lauren Boebert is polling 14 points behind potential Democratic rival Ike McCorkle in a hypothetic matchup for Colorado's 4th Congressional District according to a survey conducted on behalf of his campaign.

The poll found McCorkle, a former Marine, would get 43 percent of the vote against 27 percent for Boebert—with another 33 percent of voters undecided.

In December 2023, Boebert, a Donald Trump-supporting GOP hardliner who represents Colorado's 3rd Congressional District in the House, announced she wanted to run for the state's traditionally more conservative 4th District in a surprise move. Boebert said she made the move seeking a "fresh start" after a "pretty difficult year for me and my family," but critics argued she was worried about losing to Democrat Adam Frisch—who she narrowly beat by around 500 votes in November 2022.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 5 months ago (4 children)

😂 So Frisch will probably get her old district and another Democrat will probably get the "traditionally conservative" stronghold she tried to flee to? Really Lauren, I can almost forgive your endless asshattery and the mockery you've made of your own position in our government for this.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I was about to say didn't she already move to a "safe" district?

She can be like a Dem Johnny Appleseed, just keep running in the most conservative CO districts till they all flip blue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

She can be like a Dem Johnny Appleseed, just keep running in the most conservative CO districts till they all flip blue.

Someone get on this with photoshop or stable diffusion!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

What if she's a double agent for the democratic party? An antifa plant meant to flip republican seats for the coming of the second anti-christ after Donald Trump defeated Hillary.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, neither candidate has won their primary yet, as the article.makes clear.

To secure the Republican nomination for Colorado's 4th District in November Boebert will have to defeat state representatives Mike Lynch and Richard Holtorf, ex-state senator Jerry Sonnenberg, business owner Peter Yu and former talk radio presenter Deborah Flore. For the Democratic nomination McCorkle is running against engineer John Padora and ex-speechwriter Trisha Calvarese, who will also contest the special election in June.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

The Republican debate was last night. It was a bit of a shitshow, about zero policy talk. Mostly character attacks against Boebert.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Does it happen often, other than by a presidential tier candidate, that one single representative tier politician makes multiple districts flip?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The Republican bench is getting weirder with every cycle, as normal people no longer consider the job particular prestigious or even that lucrative. Its very possible for Dems to lose the Presidency, hold the Senate, and retake the House as the dark red gerrymandered seats attract people too weird even for the GOP base vote.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Crazy timing. Just the other day I was asking bobo how she felt being 14 points behind. She just squirted more lube into her hand and said "dont be silly".

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can tell you're lying because she likes it dry and over the pants.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Used to call that a Levi's special back in college

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Too bad she wouldn't know a thing about college though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Probably didn't stop her from being some fraternity's favorite invite to parties

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She better get those hands busy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Careful! If you say busy hands 3 times she shows up and it doesn’t matter where you are she does what you called her for.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wish this was true. I'd use this to prevent her from ever voting in Congress again with the added bonus of getting a bunch of hand jobs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As a resident of CO-4, I am withholding judgement until I get my complimentary handjob.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When Republicans nominate their people, they're not nominating their best

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, actually I think they are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

As a resident of CO-3, godspeed, she's your problem now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One extra grit, western style reach around coming up!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

She sees it as handy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Please make certain you are registered to vote.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

So long as those people stay consistent and 1 in 5 undecided voters fall to McCorkle Bobert loses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'd vote for the guy just for his name. Ike McCorkle sounds like a character from ~~Ren & Stimpy~~ Pete and Pete and I love it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House Republican Lauren Boebert is polling 14 points behind potential Democratic rival Ike McCorkle in a hypothetic matchup for Colorado's 4th Congressional District according to a survey conducted on behalf of his campaign.

Boebert said she made the move seeking a "fresh start" after a "pretty difficult year for me and my family," but critics argued she was worried about losing to Democrat Adam Frisch—who she narrowly beat by around 500 votes in November 2022.

The survey McCorkle commissioned was of 423 likely voters in Colorado's 4th District, conducted by Gravis Marketing from May 22-May 24 both online and by text.

To secure the Republican nomination for Colorado's 4th District in November Boebert will have to defeat state representatives Mike Lynch and Richard Holtorf, ex-state senator Jerry Sonnenberg, business owner Peter Yu and former talk radio presenter Deborah Flore.

For the Democratic nomination McCorkle is running against engineer John Padora and ex-speechwriter Trisha Calvarese, who will also contest the special election in June.

Boebert has a long history of courting controversy and in September 2023 was asked to leave a performance of the Beetlejuice musical in Denver along with a male companion after becoming disruptive.


The original article contains 552 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!