this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
84 points (95.7% liked)

News

23266 readers
3018 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(Brussels) – The new EU directive adopted on May 24, 2024, requiring large companies to ensure human rights respect in their value chains signals a new era for corporate accountability, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch issued a question-and-answer document about the provisions, strengths, and weaknesses of the new law.

The document describes how the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) will require companies to conduct due diligence. Under the new law, large companies will be required to identify, mitigate, prevent, and remedy harmful human rights and environmental impacts in their operations and their value chains; that is, the company’s business partners involved in production, distribution, transport, and storage of the company’s products. It provides for regulatory oversight and the possibility of initiating civil lawsuits against corporations in European courts.

“The EU’s Due Diligence Directive represents a landmark shift from voluntary corporate responsibility to mandatory obligations for corporations to prevent and address human rights abuses,” said Tirana Hassan, executive director at Human Rights Watch. “This groundbreaking law is a major victory for rights groups, trade unions, and civil society networks at the forefront of the fight for corporate accountability. Despite fierce opposition from powerful corporate lobbyists seeking to thwart or indefinitely postpone this law, this directive is a testament to the strength and perseverance of those advocating for justice and accountability in the corporate sector.”

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

going after Nestlé first?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nestlé skips the prison labor and goes straight to child slave labor

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Disgusting. It’s like corporations are playing ethical limbo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

they really are – Nestlé escaped a slavery court case in the US because they claimed none of it happened on US soil

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The ol’ gitmo defense, huh? “I learned it from watching you!”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, does anyone who's looked into this more know if this is as big as it sounds? Are there obvious loopholes?

Because legally mandated corrections of existing human rights abuses in the value chains of corporations would change corporations entirely.

That's a paradigm shift.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As far as I know it‘s pretty toothless due to but not exclusively pressure from Germany, who in the end abstained from the vote. It will be introduced in steps in the future, there won‘t be any civil prosecutions and oversight will be minimal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so there are administrative fines and civil liability, as well as exclusion from public procurement and restrictions on access to financial markets.

It'll be interesting to see what happens going forward. I'm glad to see there are at least consequences in some form rather than just due diligence guidelines that the corporations can willfully ignore without penalty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah, you‘re right! I am surprised there‘s civil liability, I thought this was omitted, but I was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah civil liability seems like a big one.

Let's see how that plays out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Ah, thanks. Shane

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Germany actually has a stricter domestic law already than what the EU is doing here.

But reality of course never matters. As long as Europeans can tell themselves the fairy tale of how they successfully fought those bad Germans for every slightly positive achievement, they are happy. Even if it's actually too little or meaningless or just virtue-signaling. Or several of those things combined...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In which ways is the German law stricter?

Is there such a strong anti German sentiment in the European parliament? Or generally in Europe?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Behind closed doors in the actual workings of the EU things are different.

But there is an universal law that you can always dress unpopular but neccessary EU decisions or compromises as "Germany made us do it" at home and can always get bonus points if you tell the story how you bravely fought Germany to push through a popular EU decision.

Basically the same propaganda for domestic a audience in slightly modified form that Orban has made an art form in Hungary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I guess it goes both ways though :I

I looked up the differences between the German and EU supply chain law, and you can‘t really suggest the German one was stricter. It for example doesn‘t include civil liability. Germany abstaining as well as them blocking other legislation recently kinda made them look like an ass. Coming from a German perspective.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I remain skeptical. Like the rest of the west, EU countries are notorious to turning a blind eye to pesky human rights getting in the way of their cheap goods. If they actually enforce this there won't be much to buy or they'll be fining a company every other day