I'm at a loss for words with this

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How have I never heard that Elon has 11 fucking kids? Every bourgeois "hero" pushing this movement deserves wall-flipped .

If decreasing birth rates are scaring you so much for the future of humanity, as if you ever really gave a shit about it, then stop enslaving the working class to the point that they have no time or money for kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago

    Capitalists heighten contradictions. They don't solve them. Proletarianization destroys the productive basis for the nuclear family while the capitalist state upholds it as an institution. Only the socialist state can resolve this contradiction with socialized childcare & childrearing, children's autonomy, abolition of marriage, etc. (sorry USSR you didn't go far enough). The capitalist solution is reaction, a return to 19th century working conditions, family relations, and religiosity that saw high birth rates. Unfortunately that all existed within the context of things, so it's probably impossible to recreate at large scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's the definition of a non-problem. Oh no, there won't be enough children to care for you in your old age? So? Suffer and die like literally every other human ever. Manufacturing new people to drive you to dialysis is fucking weird. Just... acept your mortality with at least an iota of dignity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Save the world from what? Climate change? Even ol' Elon has jumped in on the climate change denial trend.

    And why do I think every single one of them wants to sterilize anyone who isn't 100% white?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They're worried about the non-whites

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    Eugenics has always been about genocide against the other. I honestly think if birth control was only available for colored people then conservatives wouldn't have a problem with it. Abortion too. Liberals and even well meaning progressives will sometimes fall into the trap of pitching abortion and birth control as a part of the solution to poverty. Not realizing that they're actually saying the poors aren't allowed to have family.

    Edit: I don't like how I worded this but I'm also finding it hard to express what I've observed and the problems I've noticed with it. I'm very much for access to birth control and abortion for everyone. The issue I have is when people want to discourage people from having kids if they're not wealthy as a part of solving poverty. And somehow I get the feeling that the bar is often high for low income black and brown people. Like the aspiration towards progressivism is there but there's still some unchecked racism and classism leading towards support if eugenics. Not to mention I see a lot of support for out and proud eugenics against disabled people and neurodivergent people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Liberals and even well meaning progressives will sometimes fall into the trap of pitching abortion and birth control as a part of the solution to poverty.

    But access to abortion and BC does help alleviate poverty. When women are unable to choose to not have unwanted pregnancies and children, it does create a serious strain on them and their community, exacerbating poverty and everything associated with it. That isn't some idealist liberal delusion, it's very well documented reality.

    Edit, adding:

    I honestly think if birth control was only available for colored people then conservatives wouldn't have a problem with it. Abortion too

    It's just the opposite. One of the main reasons reactionaries tend to be so anti-abortion is because forcing women to have unwanted children helps to perpetuate poverty, locking communities into a cycle of impoverishment they can't escape. Meanwhile, those who are rich and white have access to abortions whether they're illegal or not, which is by design. If a rich old gammon-chud's daughter gets pregnant and she doesn't want to keep it, he's likely to help her quietly get an abortion even as he ensures people of color never have that kind of opportunity. Wealthy white people want (and generally have) the freedom to do whatever they want while they simultaneously limiting the freedoms of poor BIPOC people, all to maintain or strengthen the white supremacist system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To imply that abortion is the cure for poverty or that not having access to it is the cause is indeed false and a typical liberal refusal to look at the broader systems. But to deny how much unwanted pregnancy, along with the health risks and increased mortality rate that come with it, the burden on poor communities to provide adequate care for children when they are already overworked, etc, all contribute to and worsen poverty is absurd, and just as much a failure to recognize material reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is not Quiverfull, the fundamentalist Christian belief that large families are a blessing from God. The Collinses are atheists; they believe in science and data, studies and research. Their pronatalism is born from the hyper-rational effective altruism movement...

    yeah ok there it is. technofascists, like the real ones.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The wall is too good for these freaks

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 41 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    As of 2024, they have four children. They are, by order of birth: Octavian (son), Torsten (son), Titan Invictus (daughter), and Industry Americus (daughter).

    The state of these poor kids, especially the state of the last two names

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    they're objectifying their own children by seeing them as the means to fulfill some weird ideological goal. Reading their kids names definitely adds proof to that. Who names their child "Industry Americus"??? WTF? They sound like product releases from some weird Silicon Valley company.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago*

    I had thought the main thing that made it hard was that it’s now so incredibly expensive to raise children.

    “No,” Malcolm says. “Not at all.”

    barbara-pit

    Also, wasn't corporate-art into this shit, too?

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    CEOs and non-profit entrepreneur

    so, they run a vulture capital enterprise that has a tax evasion subsidiary.

    if they don't end up in prison for fraud, one of their kids is gonna shoot them with one of their mounted guns after seeing a sibling getting smacked one too many times.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    wasn't an article on these people written in american media like nine months ago

    EDIT: yeah it was a Chapo reading series in episode 682 Longpsermism from November 2022, so I was off by like a year

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    The Yuddites/Effective Altruists/Quakers before the Basilisk/Friends of the Status Quo/Singularity Seekers are a popular topic of scorn here.one of many incredily weird terminally online subcultures we have extremely legitimate beef with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Malcolm and Simone Collins are some of the most moronic people alive. They're both failson inheritors of their parents' wealth and have "jobs" operating their own foundations or some shit. They are actual firm believers in Effective Altruism and nominative determinism, which is why all their kids have fucking stupid names. They're both actual redditors with full bazinga brain.

    They genuinely believe their genetics are imperative to pass down because the ability to accumulate wealth is, as far as they're aware, genetic. Their genetics also gave both of them the smoothest brains ever recorded, I'm talking SI standard for frictionless surface.

    The one benefit to their harebrained scheme to populate the world with billionaires is that all of their children will be failures from the get-go, having been raised by secular Calvinists, and with so many children their wealth will wither and vanish in a series of unsuccessful artists, honorary MBA entrepreneurships, and the hordes of by-the-hour lawyers each child will hire to wrest pennies from each other's inheritance.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I mean shit, they have a point. Wealth is largely hereditary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    she observed when she saw tigers in the wild: they react to bad behaviour from their cubs with a paw, a quick negative response in the moment, which they find very effective with their own kids. “I was just giving you the context so you don’t think I’m abusive or something,” he says.

    Oh so they beat their kids too and lie about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    TIGERS CANNOT TALK AND HUMANS HAVE LANGUAGE, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I hate the "I saw wild animals doing it" argument. Not only is it constantly used to justify fascistic beliefs and actions it's also so fucking dumb. What's next? Giving a TED talk about how anthropology isn't needed anymore because I stared at a tank full of fucking sea monkeys?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Their pronatalism is born from the hyper-rational effective altruism movemen

    Wait wat the actual fuck? I thought this was quiverfull freaks. Now the Basilisk humpers are doing it?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Listen this isn’t being a doomer, this is just reality. America will lead an eco fascist alliance of western nations against allowing refugees in their nations. America will likely have a full scale war with at least half of Asian before 2050. America will prevent the world from making global solutions towards climate change. We need to understand as the left that all these things will happen BEFORE the left even rises from its death in 1991.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Whoever convinced the idle rich to do the opposite of a single child policy to split their family fortune up is a pretty funny bit. A few generations and the rich will breed themselves down to middle class.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    You remind me of an interesting cultural habit in ancient Ireland, where they would shave off branching families, cutting them from the family name and inheritance to maintain large holdings within the main families.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The imminent arrival of their fourth child, a girl they plan to name Industry Americus Collins, turns out to be only the first in a string of surprises – and one really shocking thing – that I will encounter during my day with the pronatalists

    I can’t read this. You can’t make me

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    birth rate is such a bad modifer though it's better late game to move on to women's suffrage laws for that +%workforce bonus while focusing on immigration to boost your population

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago*

    The people that believe they have the greatest genetics in the world to carry the future human race have terrible eyesight and need glasses apparently.

    Not that I'm against glasses or anything but you know it's clown shit when people that are naturally blind claim to have the best genetics.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    My grandma had 9 kids and didn’t make being a parent her personality….

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Those poor kids. At first I was laughing at these dumbasses but the end of the article feels like falling into a pit.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Lmao fucking freaks. They can do this shit all they want and the national birthrate will still trail behind Guatemala’s.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago*

    Giving your kid some kind of nerd ass Latin-sounding "power name" should result in you being forced to eat boiled shoelaces every day until you die

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›