▲ 101 ▼ [cw: eugenics, physical child abuse] I'm feeling physically ill after reading this article: America’s premier pronatalists on having ‘tons of kids’ to save the world (www.theguardian.com) submitted 2 years ago by piccolo@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments I'm at a loss for words with this
[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (3 children) I mean shit, they have a point. Wealth is largely hereditary permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ssj2marx@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] fox@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago These people think wealth is generic, which is why it's imperative to have as many kids as possible so they too can collect all the money and do a better effective Altruism at some point in the future. They're devour followers of that Big Yud school of thought permalink fedilink source parent [–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ssj2marx@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ssj2marx@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fox@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago These people think wealth is generic, which is why it's imperative to have as many kids as possible so they too can collect all the money and do a better effective Altruism at some point in the future. They're devour followers of that Big Yud school of thought permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter. permalink fedilink source parent