I'm at a loss for words with this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I mean shit, they have a point. Wealth is largely hereditary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    These people think wealth is generic, which is why it's imperative to have as many kids as possible so they too can collect all the money and do a better effective Altruism at some point in the future. They're devour followers of that Big Yud school of thought

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    True, and having large amounts of heirs with no skills or education needs a term like "inheritance imbreeding" since they will end up diluting the wealth-gene pool until they are left with nothing and hopefully go extinct after all the wealth has been absorbed into the general population. Or more likely, absorbed by a grifter.

  • source
  • parent