this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
231 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19237 readers
3344 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea is to make it effectively legal to kill anybody deemed left-of-center

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 88 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“The Board voted unanimously to recommend a full pardon and restoration of firearm rights.”

So they recommend to give him his guns back to shoot more protesters. Fucking disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Texas has a long tradition of pardoning lynch mobs.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Before Abbot or just with Abbot? (I don’t know if Texas has term limits. I’m assuming no)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Since its inception

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The prosecutors should immediately contact the DOJ and see if a federal case makes sense. Governor Murder-Pardoner can't pardon a federal conviction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be double jeopardy since he has already been tried and convicted by the court?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nope. It's only double jeopardy if it happens in the same jurisdiction. A Federal trial would mean federal charges, which aren't the same as state charges. Not the same charges, not double jeopardy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Ok, thanks for the clarification

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess some lives matter more than others... To Republicans anyway.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Yes, that’s the entire point of “black lives matter”

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

Just a honest showing of what it means to be a Conservative Republican Christian.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

Fucking atrocious.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

Better article that includes a list of racist statements Perry posted to social media that were just unsealed by the judge in his trial.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Texas has one of the strongest ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws of self-defense that cannot be nullified by a jury or a progressive District Attorney,” he said in a statement. “I thank the Board for its thorough investigation, and I approve their pardon recommendation.

pesky juries and DAs thinking they have legal authority!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Once again, Governor Hot Wheels and his Cavalcade of Corruption are doing what they do best: being completely and totally ignorant as to the desires of the population.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not cool. We don’t make fun of people because they are in wheelchairs

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He's a living, breathing piece of shit. A real medical marvel if you ask me. He deserves to be called every single slur in the book.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Associating that sack of shit with people who need wheelchairs is an insult to all people with a disability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure people with disabilities aren't standing up for him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We have free reign when the subject is a fascist piece of republican trash who pardons cold blooded murderers.

I wish the tree would have done a better job on that absolute waste of human life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

No you don’t.

By attacking his wheelchair instead of his actual policies you are saying the fact that he is handicapped is worse than his policies.

You can choose plenty of words for the cancerous anal fissure leakage of a person, but don’t attack his wheelchair, because then you are attacking everyone in one.

It’s not about me, you, or him at that point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like federal civil rights violations to me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who's gonna enforce it? Nothing happend last time Texas broke federal law and had a little standoff with federal immigration officers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

DOJ. There are Federal charges for this guy as well as civil suits.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Knowing Abbott I am not surprised.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Garbage state full of garbage people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not all of us condone this kind of shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

No, just the millions that voted for him AND the millions that didn't even bother to vote.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

To be fair he said it's full of garbage people, not that all of you are garbage people. If my house had 2 garbage people in it I would be tempted to take the garbage out as that's full for me.