top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 217 points 2 years ago (41 children)

Oh god this is me.

Arguing with a VP that their expectations aren’t realistic, our market is saturated and cost of are increasing.

“You’re just not being creative enough, 20% annual growth isn’t even worth me being in this meeting. Come back when you have bigger numbers”

Oh okay. I just spent a quarter doing deep competitive analysis on every project on our roadmap and backlog with detailed per line analyses, but sure, your gut knows more.

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Isn't that just the most frustrating thing about working in the corporate world? People like us that look at actual data will never make it past being middle management at the highest. If you wanna make it to the top, you have to be able to confidently pull numbers from your ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It's even worse with snake oil salesman and AI.

    A guy built an AI model (i.e. wrote a prompt for the ChatGPT API) which generates fantastic looking offline test results for a problem. He promised the execs this will drive significant growth, so he's on the fast track straight to the top and definitely got some nice bonuses. All his projects get big teams and resources.

    I looked at the "projected" numbers, they make no sense, it's just straight up made up numbers. It solves a problem nobody actually has, so nobody actually uses the output. The real usage numbers are abysmal.

    Doesn't matter, we're counting on this for growth, haven't I seen the model scores he demo'd?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I have a similar story. A few years ago, when I was young and naïve, I worked at a startup that tried to build electric busses.

    The person who planned how long each prototype construction task was going to take was the CFO, who had zero technical experience, when I tried to explain my job to her, she said "Sorry, Justas, I am just a woman, I don't understand anything."

    Later I heard that CFO in question estimated new prototype construction to take 3 months. That seemed farfetched, so I went to the garage to talk to the assembly people and they said "3 months? We'll be lucky if we get finished in 9!" To which she replied "They don't know anything, I am the one in charge of the planning!"

    I left shortly afterwards and was the last person to receive my salary on time. They started going into debt and I recently read an article about them going into bankruptcy. So much shit happened there I could write a book about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Give us one more story please! 🍿

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Imagine you are trying to create something new, but not completely. Suppliers for most electric bus parts exist, ZTF being chief amongst them. Did the executives enter the market with a strategy to buy everything they could, assemble it, enter the market quicker, build many units, learn how busses are built and then innovate from experienced position? Nope.

    A toddler learns to crawl before learning to run. A bird learns to hop before learning to fly. Our executives started to innovate before learning to build.

    Why buy or build a metal frame? Too many parts, let's build the frame out of composite materials, only a few parts to glue together and the CEO has contacts amongst the yacht builders.

    The end result drove like a tank. It had zero flexibility, was way too rigid for any passenger carrying vehicle and tended to lean to one side. Together with a bunch of windows that can't be opened and a skylight it was a greenhouse on wheels during the summer.

    Composite parts getting glued required sanding and pieces of it are still embedded into poor sod's who did that hands.

    The bus also featured a front windscreen curved too heavily for most crucibles to make one.

    Can't we just buy a dashboard? No, can't get attached to a supplier, gotta build our own thing. The designer didn't plan for a spot for a driver to store their coat and bag. Also, it had no place to keep money and bus tickets for those passengers who didn't buy them earlier.

    Several dashboards got designed, money dried up and the people who designed and built them left. Yup, all Fantastic Four of them, leaving a poorly documented mess for people who come after them.

    I was tasked with building a telemetry system and a user information system.

    Built a telemetry system with Grafana and a data collection script running in bus'es computer. Me and one other guy was the whole team.

    For information system, I used Vue and Python on a Raspberry pi running cog, a very minimal WebKit browser. It had a 3D bus on an angled map and said which stops come next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Amazing.

    I'm not a business guy and I know nothing about commercial vehicles. But I have to imagine this setup is the hardest possible way to get into that market. I can appreciate wanting to build some kind of super-bus from the ground up, but unless your dream team is made up of industry veterans, that's not likely to work.

    IMO, it would be better to start with ready-made vehicles and focus on attacking the underbelly of the establishment. Like bus routes that are expensive to service via conventional means, or communities that can't afford existing options. Or at least work with established players and solve their problems like logistics, labor, or cost optimization. Then you iterate and innovate from there, culminating at a "bus of your dreams" or whatever it was on the CEO's bucket list.

    Looking at an industry that is over 100 years old and saying "we can do this better" from almost nothing is kind of insane.

    Your telemetry and route visualization system sounds nice though - that kind of thing is in my wheelhouse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Ah, yes the industry veterans. They had none. Most of the staff were recent university graduates. Those who weren't included a former minister, an engineer who designed various industrial buildings, like crude oil storage tanks, and electricity engineer.

    Together, they designed and built a pantograph mostly by themselves, a high power charging system that worked through the roof that charged a 50 kW battery in 6 minutes.

    The rest of the specialists were mostly obscure scientists, analysts, accountants and PR people.

    Since I have already leaked myself, here is a picture of the "amazing superbus" prototype: link

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] 51 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You've found your spirit animal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That feeling when you've finally found your spirit animal and it turns out to be a middle manager who's only slightly better looking than the previous president..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    That’s so annoying.

    Any way to force the ball into their court? IDK, “which one of these line items deserves another look”, that kind of thing… if you put all your creativity into trying to call their BS, you know :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If you do tell them you’d need a completely unrealistic scenario for that project to hit a good number then one of two things will happen:

    “well you need to think of changes to those projects to get there, that’s what we’re paying you for”

    or “you haven’t considered that X initiative will massively boost the numbers, so we’ll easily hit our goal” with X being some project a self aggrandizing jackass confidently promised will deliver absurd results and now leadership loves them (currently that’s anyone saying to add AI to stuff that very much doesn’t need it). If this happens just wash your hands of it and document it as a key growth factor.

    The goal of these meetings is often to justify projects that leadership has already agreed on, don’t want to be challenged on, and are simply looking for the numbers they can put on a slide and parade to the board or investors.

    It’s a very hard sell to convince them to drop or realistically modify projects. There are execs who will listen to the numbers, but I’m finding them increasingly rare now that everyone is in greedy self preservation mode.

    My worst example: a company brought me on to validate and provide recommendations for a big project that was struggling. I looked at the numbers, the margins were always going to be terrible, it needed massive economy of scale and to be successful (always always a red flag!), cost a lot to make, and the revenue numbers were forecast to be low thousands a year. I told the CEO and execs this project was doomed, drop it and focus elsewhere, but they felt it would be a huge breakout success, making up a significant portion of corporate revenues, and the numbers were irrelevant (so why did they hire me?).

    They still offer that product, it still definitely makes no money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 99 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I love the later bit where Wormtongue says “There is no such army”, and Saruman shows him the army he must have spent an hour walking through on the way in.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago* (21 children)

    To be fair to Saruman, this orc didn't think to use the nearby forest to stoke the fires until he was told to. Not the brightest bulb.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 237 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    What happened after they used the forest?

    The trees slaughtered his workers, broke a damn, and destroyed the factory.

    Typical executive short term thinking, yeah, Saruman hit his production targets, but he Boeinged them by doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 105 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    At least this time Saruman(c-suite for sure) didn’t catch a golden parachute from the board on his way out the door to guide(Sabatoge) another kingdom(company)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just like how all public companies focus on the quarterly numbers and nothing else. No one gives a shit about next year or even next quarter. It's always "how much money are we making in the next 3 months, all else be damned."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago*

    "There aren't enough trees in the tower grounds to keep the fires going m'lord..."

    "TEAR OUT THE ENTIRE FOREST!"

    "Oh jeez... That's like... A lot of extra overtime. You sure we can cover everyone's wages?"

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    HAHA, yes!

    And then the solution was to piss off the Ents.

    God, I love the extended editions.,

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    He's got uruk HR breathing down his neck and the Orc union delegate isn't accepting overtime

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Another job lost to gubukGPT

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›