They seem to be emphasizing "legal coyote hunt." The reality is, any shooter is supposed to identify their target and what is behind it. As a hunter, if you can not 100% identify the animal, you don't pull the trigger. To the letter of the law (and responsible firearms handling), this was a bad shot. If I have a doe tag and shoot an antlerless buck, I have not made a legal harvest.
Michigan
Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam in braccas mea vide
🫴
✋
Banner photos credits
The wolf was over 80lbs, 2-4x as much as a coyote would have been.
Definitely a bad shot
I've seen some very large coyotes in the PNW, ones that could easily be mistaken for wolves if I didn't already know there are no wolves in my area. So I can understand why the shooter thought it was a coyote, considering there were supposedly no wolves in their area.
Someone saw a wolf AND an opportunity.
Is there ever a legitimate reason/situation for shooting either? I've never heard of it being worthwhile as food and I can only see this as someone who wants to kill animals like a nut job and push boundaries like a literal child at the same time
Overpopulation in wild animals leads to the spread of disease to each other and also to people (75% of re-emergent human viruses over the last century have come from wild animal populations).
An overpopulation of predators also wipes out prey species and eventually causes a mass die-off of the predators themselves through starvation and competition.
Lastly, humans have wiped out most of the species that keep wild populations in check, like wolves. We created this issue, and sometimes we have to take on icky but necessary responsibilities for our actions as a species.
There is much more to this than what you can apparently see.