It's closed source. So it's impossible to verify Facebook doesn't have you pkey and goes MitM.
They say they don't, but you can only take their word for it.
You still can. But I see how trying to shoehorn collaboration into a purely text-file-based platform would be a huge PITA.
Horses for courses.
What do they mean by "fake arrow decals?" They're real arrow decals. Just not helpful ones.
Microsoft assumes their users are complete idiots, even when they (the users) are actively trying to convince them (Microsoft) otherwise. No matter how advanced the feature may be, they'll assume you found instructions somewhere to do something entirely unrelated and they constantly have to save you from yourself. As a result you constantly have to fight the OS for access and control to get it to do what you want.
If you're even a bit of a power user that is, of course.
But more often than not Microsoft's assumption is probably spot on.
They vastly overestimated their users' willingness to pay for content and put up with their bullshit.
No opt out? Expect trouble from the EU.
And that's why people started sailing the high seas again.
Du willst keine Photos von dir, die dich beim Spazieren mit Nazis zeigen? DANN GEH NICHT MIT NAZIS SPAZIEREN, DU PFOSTEN!
Enjoy your bian, I guess.
I refused to return to office.
Jesse's absolutely right. The only reason our politicians are governing us is because we let them. Occasionally they need to be reminded of that fact.
Chais
0 post score0 comment score
Not necessarily and also not how I understood the post. It's certainly an option and an ergonomic one at that. So it's not unthinkable they go that route.
But you could also offer a choice of backend when creating a new graph. Text-based allows you to sync you files between devices, e.g. via source control, and offer asynchronous collaboration this way, while the DB-based approach forfeits source control and opts to keep its data consistent through simultaneous edits from multiple clients itself.
But managing that consistency takes quite considerable effort, as we're witnessing, for no clear advantage, just a tradeoff. And I at least think it would be a shame to let the work already gone into the development of the text backend go to waste. I think the devs might share that opinion.