Interesting. Hmm...
Somewhat. I'm more annoyed that my belly is more man-ish than woman-ish and is bigger than my chest right now. Now, considering how well... endowed... the AFAB women in my family are and the fact that I've only been on hrt for about 5 months, that's gonna change. But... I feel like the "man belly" and lack of boobage contributes to me being misgendered despite all the people who know me saying I'm already basically fem-drogynous. It's a struggle not to abuse my hrt meds and take more than I'm supposed to.
I'm 30 damn it, if I'd come out 10yrs ago I'd probably be done transitioning.
Oh well.
Edit: something I like about the furry community is how much body-positive art exists. It used to be that the furry community had the same issues with idealizing anorexia; however, nowadays furry art tends to have a wide variety of body types ranging from relatively typical to chubby, stocky, morbidly obese, etc. Very affirming and helped me learn to be okay with my weight, though I'm still kinda annoyed with how my body fat is actually distributed. >.>
Yeap, that's how the placebo effect works. Your brain is really good at making things happen based on expectations. Granted, they could just be an asshole and thought alcohol/drugs would give them an excuse, but my understanding is that yeah, that's the placebo effect at work.
Yeah, seriously. I was expecting some kinda weird interaction that was causing the star to eject fuel in a constant stream. The title is backwards though, and no where near as noteworthy.
Someone already named Tale of Tails, but I'll throw in A Show of the Ropes by Glopossum.
Just a reminder that Mike White appeared on a podcast run by Andrew Sullivan - known for promoting the "bell jar" pseudoscientific theory on racial intelligence potentials - in order to promote autogynephilia. Autogynephilia is a similarly pseudoscientific concept which claims that trans people can be split into two categories: "true" trans, and men with a fetish for appearing as a woman (aka, a paraphilia).
For those who are new to the concept (most cis people aren't familiar with it), there are a lot of problems with it, both the original concept and the way it's wielded.
-
It is often used to erase the possibility of being a non-heterosexual trans woman by defining "true" trans women as being exclusively attracted to men.
-
It is often used to erase the existence of trans women who wish to appear butch or otherwise androgynous (I personally identify as fem, but enjoy the idea of looking fem-drogynous).
-
It is often used to erase the identities between the binaries.
-
It did not have a cisfem control group.
-
It did not account for trans men and is often used to erase trans men.
-
It fails to take into account that the arousal towards seeing oneself as their chosen gender could be rooted in self-actualization and not objectification of the female body or fetishization of femininity.
-
It fails to account for the fact that arousal from pride in one's self-image is something that cis people can experience. As an extension of this it fails to consider the fact that, having been starved of that experience, the feelings associated with that experience will almost certainly be far stronger for trans people who are just learning to take pride in their appearance.
Even its existence by itself is an issue because, as I can attest to, it's not uncommon for autogynephilia to be one of the first things a trans person, especially a trans woman, might come across while playing devil's advocate with their own dysphoric desires.
One of the reasons why I personally took 10yrs to actually start transitioning was because, as a 20yr old just discovering the concept of transness after moving out for the first time, autogynephilia was one of the first things I read about. Because of the fact that I found transformation art, especially relating to gender transformation, to be arousing, I believed that I was simply a man with a fetish.
It wasn't until far later that I discovered that what I experienced was relatively normal for trans people and didn't erase my transness. Someone explained to me their own belief as to why, which makes a hell of a lot more sense than the mental gymnastics being done by autogynephilia - due to how sexuality and gender are interlinked with each other, it's unsurprising that the rush of hormones from feeling pride in your appearance as your preferred gender (aka, gender euphoria) after lacking that experience for most of your life would cause sexual arousal.
It's a very harmful concept, even just passively, and it makes me sad that Mike White is still being platformed after promoting it. Though not surprising, I suppose, considering that companies like Warner Bros and HBO can't stop chewing on Rowling's fetid, rancid cunt.
(For those more familiar with fighting against the term, lemme know if I missed any issues with autogynephilia because I'm sure there are a lot I haven't covered)
Uhh.... Someone was literally raped on set, in front of an audience, and no one got arrested? Are you fucking serious?
Yeah. My nightmares have gotten super real. They were generally nonsense when I was a child, though.
However, as an adult?
Wandering down dark corridors with a general, building feeling that I'm being stalked, watched, followed by someone lurking just out of sight in the shadows, tension rising, body tingling, adrenaline spiking, soundless scream, body paralyzed, hissing names hoping someone will hear but no one comes. My flesh melts, my teeth fall out, void fall, abyss calls, never ending, rotten skin, smell of blood, moving slow, can't run.
c:
Ye, significantly so. I've actually come across some highly sexual comics with decent stories. It's kinda wild.
Yeah, well, that's really, really sweet and would honestly rather have that occur or have a friend decide to cuddle with me than to get a bunch of dicks drawn on my face.
I'm a furry. It's almost mandatory.
MossyFeathers
0 post score0 comment score
Eh, I get vaguely lesbiphobic vibes from that image, but I don't think it's intentional so I'll give it a pass. Also I prefer glorifying David Tennant.
Pedro Pascal seems like a supportive sweetheart. Meanwhile it seems like David Tennant is the supporter who woke up and chose violence. Also he was really hot as Crowley, ngl. Sucks about Gaiman, Good Omens had some really strong queer vibes.