Perhaps you should look up the definition of “censorship”. You literally just described it
Until Gaia has had enough. Then the quarters never matter again
This is a ruling about content according to the quoted passage. That’s censorship of ideas by definition
Any ideas that the EU doesn’t want discussed. Support for Russia or criticism of Ukraine, for example.
NOTE that I do not support Russia or think Ukraine is wrong in the current environment. And I understand that any government wants to prevent opposing propaganda from spreading within its borders.
Is there a credible source for this? Netanyahu mouthpieces don’t impress me
There is some evidence that the environment always wins in the long term
Also not a legal expert, but
any natural or legal person directly or indirectly responsible for making available or transmitting that content to the public
would seem to catch personal social media posts as well. Otherwise, there’s still an exploitable loophole.
Aren’t EU sanctions economic? In that case, limiting RT seems reasonable. This ruling, though, seems aimed at enforcing a ban on discussing certain ideas. It’s censorship. Perhaps it’s justified, although censorship has never really worked; it’s only driven speakers underground and into dark corners where authorities can’t monitor them so easily.
Interesting read. Since he likely knows a lot of these teams, nothing is stopping him emailing them gift cards.
Who the hell thinks beta software is appropriate for real-world applications in something as dangerous as vehicle control at highway speeds?
I've come to believe that all Teslas should be recalled until they get their act together. They're getting people hurt and killed by field testing their experiments on roadways that we paid for.
People don’t like offices and are more productive when they’re happy. Who knew?
They know how to attract players. If they choose not to, that’s on them