Fair point. Sorry if I misread it
I’m reminded almost daily of someone saying during the Cheney Administration “1984 was a warning, not a handbook!”
A lesser violation of privacy is still a violation of privacy. “It could be worse” isn’t a particularly persuasive argument
Can’t wait til DOGE doofuses get hold of that!
Not only is she a bigot and bully in her own right, she also can’t read or understand spoken English.
Interesting read. Since he likely knows a lot of these teams, nothing is stopping him emailing them gift cards.
Ummm, have these numbnuts never heard of a VPN?
HP. There’s the mistake.
This reads like a statement from a vulture capitalist who plans to break up the company and sell the parts to make a quick buck. One would think they would focus on building trust, not giving yet more devs reasons to use a different engine.
In other words, “Our Indian moderation subcontractor applied Indian law to Canadian posts in Canada. Oops.”
Who the hell thinks beta software is appropriate for real-world applications in something as dangerous as vehicle control at highway speeds?
I've come to believe that all Teslas should be recalled until they get their act together. They're getting people hurt and killed by field testing their experiments on roadways that we paid for.
People don’t like offices and are more productive when they’re happy. Who knew?
The trust problem in open source is that we can audit the published code, but we have no assurance that what’s published is what’s running