[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

By the time they're pregnant, they've been on this planet long enough to know basic information literacy. The warnings of this fringe trend are commonplace. Rationalizing this idiocy is pathetic.

Saying the baby is better off dead is cruel and victim blaming.

and true. No fucks given: opinion of "cruel and victim blaming" discarded.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 7 hours ago

That moderator @snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr sure acts entitled by policing tone. Their pointless gestures of defending honor

I also asked users to edit their comment, here, when they critized lemmy and i expect you to do the same.

are unnecessary. Still, they've only requested, so they aren't (yet) powertripping.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 hours ago

The public is being shown just enough to know the truth

That they know nothing?

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 9 hours ago

Biases & fallacy of incomplete evidence are not reasonable. Their willful ignorance is completely blameworthy.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 11 hours ago

It's as if a well-connected person knows/communicates with a lot people. Weird to call social networking a fetish.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 hours ago

What is this pro-Keanu propaganda?

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 hours ago

Goddamn so everyone’s a bastard, eh?

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 12 hours ago

Nah, handing someone your phone without sensible precautions to lock down sensitive data is irresponsible and begging for trouble. There's never a good reason to do that just to show a photo. Someone might think you're sharing an album, and even then, there are far better ways to share without compromising security.

Might as well share your bank account with them or spread your ass cheeks wide open. Such irresponsibility lacks etiquette.

Lack of text alternative breaks etiquette and web accessibility.Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:

  • usability
    • we can't quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
    • text search is unavailable
    • the system can't
      • reflow text to varied screen sizes
      • vary presentation (size, contrast)
      • vary modality (audio, braille)
  • accessibility
    • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
    • some users can't read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
    • users can't adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
    • systems can't read the text to them or send it to braille devices
  • searchability: the "text" isn't indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
  • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
    • image breaks
    • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

People who need remedial logic would think that, maybe. Punxsutawney Phil is also in the Epstein files.

Did you know anyone can allege absolutely anything? Did you know conspiracy theorists were spinning their fabulist nonsense about Epstein & beyond[^nonsense] years before the scandal gained traction mainstream & their half-baked ideas continue to shape our discourse?

A skeptical insistence on conclusive evidence & not falling for logical fallacies is rudimentary to scientific reasoning. It's pathetic a community purportedly interested in science seems to forget that.

[^nonsense]: blood libel, pizzagate, qanon, cabal of pedophile adrenochrome harvesters, political & Hollywood elites, George Soros

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 18 hours ago

The New York attorney general, Letitia James, said the state’s new legal observers would be volunteer employees from her office, trained to observe, without interfering, whether Trump’s immigration enforcement “remains within the bounds of the law”.

Why isn't that the police ordered to do the goddamn job?

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure if you participate in the economy at all, your money is circulating through Nazi pockets & it's just a matter of looking hard enough. Any US taxpayer is definitely funding that Nazi.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago

Behold the rewards of not linking to source: commenters fall for engagement bait, lack of web accessibility.

Post needs link to source for web accessibility and web connectivity.Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:

  • usability
    • we can't quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
    • text search is unavailable
    • the system can't
      • reflow text to varied screen sizes
      • vary presentation (size, contrast)
      • vary modality (audio, braille)
  • accessibility
    • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
    • some users can't read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
    • users can't adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
    • systems can't read the text to them or send it to braille devices
  • web connectivity
    • we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source
    • we can't explore wider context of the original message
  • authenticity: we don't know the image hasn't been tampered
  • searchability: the "text" isn't indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
  • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
    • image breaks
    • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.

6
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com moderator @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com removed my comment

meme: bitches dont know bout my spoiler effect
or primaries

a spoiler effect happens when a losing candidate affects the results of an election simply by participating

Vote splitting is the most common cause of spoiler effects in FPP. In these systems, the presence of many ideologically-similar candidates causes their vote total to be split between them, placing these candidates at a disadvantage. This is most visible in elections where a minor candidate draws votes away from a major candidate with similar politics, thereby causing a strong opponent of both to win.

This willful ignorance of the spoiler effect is tiresome denialism of mathematics. We've already seen the consequences.

reminding that primaries exist & quoting wikipedia's explanation that in the US's voting system, voting for minor candidates spoils the election in favor of the major party candidate the voter opposes most. In context

the post is titled

Vote Blue No Matter Who

with my comment responding to the parent comment, which practically denies the point the higher comment is driving at that not "voting blue" can only spoil the election in favor of "the fascists". Ignoring the purpose of primaries, the parent comment suggested alternatives that still don't "vote Blue".

According to the modlog entry | Time | mod | Action | |


|


|


| | | mod | Removed Comment ![meme: bitches dont know bout my spoiler effect][bout] or primaries > a [spoiler effect][spoiler] happens when a losing candidate affects the results of an election simply by participating > Vote splitting is the most common cause of spoiler effects in FPP. In these systems, the presence of many ideologically-similar candidates causes their vote total to be split between them, placing these candidates at a disadvantage. This is most visible in elections where a minor candidate draws votes away from a major candidate with similar politics, **thereby causing a strong opponent of both to win**. This willful ignorance of the spoiler effect is tiresome denialism of mathematics. We've already seen the consequences. [bout]: https://i.imgflip.com/ab9g3o.jpg [spoiler]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiler_effect by lmmarsano reason: Rule 3 |

the moderator claims this violates rule

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of “Marxist”-“Leninists” (read: Dengists) (actual ML’s are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don’t just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

Somehow, straightforward social choice theory (a branch of mathematical social science) is "liberalism", "revisionism", or "reactionary". Is "1 + 1 = 2" equally problematic?

Maybe moderators shouldn't claim mathematics is ideology.

251

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/7708130

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technicallythetruth by /u/NewSomethingUnlocked on 2026-01-26 22:08:18+00:00.

12
Giraffe Fight (youtu.be)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world

Younger rival fights an old bull giraffe.

33
Defecation postures (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world

Thumbnail: An illustration of a man squatting on the squat toilet.

48

authoritarians of any side deprecate liberal values (ie, individual liberty) & treat the individual as an expendable means to (rather than the nonexpendable ends of) their illiberal agenda

2
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Nick @Nickiquote@mstdn.social

Sometimes people just want to be able to complain about Windows or iOS without being told about Linux.

Maybe it’s a work computer and it’s not their choice. Maybe they’re not a computer toucher and do not have confidence touching computers. Maybe they were perfectly happy using these OSs before some stupid new feature was introduced. Maybe they’re tired or stressed or have no time.

If the obvious reply to the post is “use Linux”, as a rule, do not post that. You are not adding anything.

image: A comic strip featuring two characters. The left panel shows the first character shushing another while holding their lips closed, while the right panel depicts the same characters with the first character continuing: "LET PEOPLE COMPLAIN."

Oct 26, 2025, 03:27 PM

32
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/til@lemmy.world

Preschool lied to me: zebras make sounds!

At least six different calls have been documented for the plains zebra. One is its distinctive, high-pitched, contact call (commonly called "barking") heard as "a-ha, a-ha, a-ha" or "kwa-ha, kaw-ha, ha, ha" also transcribed as "kwahaah", or "oug-ga". The species name quagga is derived from the Khoikhoi word for "zebra" and is onomatopoeic for its call.

88

cross-posted from: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/31579317

Liberals and conservatives both oppose censorship of children’s literature – unless the writing offends their own ideology, new Cornell research finds.

refers to research article The Polarization of Literary Censorship in the U.S.

24
submitted 3 months ago by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/usa@midwest.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/31579317

Liberals and conservatives both oppose censorship of children’s literature – unless the writing offends their own ideology, new Cornell research finds.

refers to research article The Polarization of Literary Censorship in the U.S.

38

cross-posted from: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/31579317

Liberals and conservatives both oppose censorship of children’s literature – unless the writing offends their own ideology, new Cornell research finds.

refers to research article The Polarization of Literary Censorship in the U.S.

11
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com to c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Liberals and conservatives both oppose censorship of children’s literature – unless the writing offends their own ideology, new Cornell research finds.

refers to research article The Polarization of Literary Censorship in the U.S.

view more: next ›

lmmarsano

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago