top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 8 months ago (4 children)

9 mentions in the files: 1 story about someone stealing his watches, 1 matrix joke, 1 mention of 47 Ronin, the rest are duplicates of promotional material for an acting class listing him as a former student.

Phew, looks like he's clear.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Whats the best way to search the documents for a specific name?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 8 months ago* (26 children)

    If we could make a new political party, and just call it the American people's party, and make it a genuine party for genuine people, I feel like Keanu should be the parties nominee for president, followed by Jon Stewart

    If you vote for the person you would want to be your boss, the country would be a lot better off.

    Most people wouldn't want a vindictive, lying, cheating, could raping, fraud with no actual talent, skill, strategy, or empathy as a boss.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Keanu's Canadian, so.... You could become the 11th province?

    (this is meant as light-hearted ribbing aimed at someone who clearly wants to see their country go in a better direction, I hope it's taken as such)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    I would totally sign onto that if my taxes get me healthcare

    Honestly, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois are waaaaayyyy closer to joining Canada than you'd think

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Fortunately or unfortunately, Canada isn't ready to accept them. It would require a major change to our Constitution, and opening that can of worms for major revisions isn't going to happen (history with Quebec, they never signed on the first time and were forced into it, two attempts to renegotiate failed, they had three referenda on separating from Canada...)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Ok, Quebec and Texas get to succeed to Quebexas, we get a much less incompetent and slightly less evil government, you no longer get subjected to America's extremely normal foreign policy. I see no problems here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Oh my god... Quebec and Texas together would be the worst pairing. Other than not wanting the federal government to control anything, they have almost nothing in common. e.g. Montreal is one of North America's most livable cities; Houston is one of the least.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    I like the idea, but, join APP seems like maybe not the best acronym.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    It's better than the American Socialist Society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Join ASS!

    It does have a ring to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I've thought that too, but then again, in a near future where any opposition ideology may be persecuted, it would actually be an ideal acronym. It would be confusing for AI to parse when the usage is entirely context based. The false positives would ruin anything collected

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    There's probably quite a few famous people in the Epstien files who were just paid to make an appearance or speech or similar at an event before he was infamous...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, the guy had a real fetish for surrounding himself with smart people, especially considering he was (based on the evidence in the files that have been released so far) a remarkably dumb person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    He wanted to play music with his band at my family business. We have a capacity for only 60 people or something small like that. He was so full of himself, he was offended we said no. He wanted to bring in 100 people, causing us to break the law and safety of our guests. Then I think he called us foolish or dumb or something. I forget because it’s been about 20 years or so. I couldn’t believe it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Whilst obviously not as atrocious as being in the Epstein files, Keanu did appear on pseudo-archeologist Graham Hancock’s “Ancient Apocalypse” who has been shitting a load of pseudoscience into current discussion about archaeology and ancient civilisation.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    was it on purpose or was it like when kate mulgrew unknowingly did voiceover for a geocentrism documentary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Why Keanu Reeves Is In Ancient Apocalypse Season 2, Explained by Graham Hancock

    Hard to say with absolute certainty as I can’t find anything about him outright speaking against it after appearing in it, but with the smallest amount of due diligence you can find out easily what sort of man Graham Hancock is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Flint Dibble's debate in Joe Rogan was the desconstruction I needed to see to completley break the spell. Grahams stories really sparked my imagination and since I know very little about archeology, it was easy to not be more skeptic about his claims.

    Also looking at Grahams past interviews you can clearly see that he is a doomsday grifter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    So we're a lot of legit scientists, who later said Graham Hancock manipulated the meaning of what was said through editing, or outright misrepresented them by surrounding what was said with a different context.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›